Efficacy and Safety of Asenapine Compared With Olanzapine in Patients With Persistent Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia (A7501013)(COMPLETED)(P05771)
A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Flexible -Dose, 6-Month Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Asenapine With Olanzapine in Stable Subjects With Predominant, Persistent Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia.
3 other identifiers
interventional
468
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Treatment with conventional antipsychotics such as haloperidol has little effect or may sometimes even worsen negative symptoms (such as blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, and poor rapport) of schizophrenia. The newer "atypical" antipsychotics agents, such as olanzapine, has shown improvement in the treatment of negative symptoms in acute trials. The purpose of this study is to compare an investigational compound (asenapine) with a marketed agent (olanzapine) in the treatment of stable subjects with persistent negative symptoms of schizophrenia for 6 months. Patients completing this study may be eligible to participate in an extension 6 months of treatment. Patients are required to have stable symptoms prior to entry into study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 schizophrenia
Started Dec 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_3 schizophrenia
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 25, 2010
CompletedFebruary 8, 2022
February 1, 2022
3.9 years
September 1, 2005
March 5, 2010
February 4, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia Measured by the Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA) Scale Total Score
The NSA Scale is a 16-item clinician-rated instrument for rating the negative symptomatology of schizophrenia. Total score ranges from 16 to 96, with greater scores indicating greater severity of symptoms.
Day 182
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Measured by the Quality of Life Scale (QLS) Total Score
Day 182
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Day 182
Study Arms (2)
asenapine
EXPERIMENTALolanzapine
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have a documented current diagnosis of schizophrenia of paranoid, disorganized, catatonic, residual, or undifferentiated subtype with persistent negative symptoms.
- No increase in level of psychiatric care during the past few months due to worsening of symptoms of schizophrenia.
- Caregiver required.
You may not qualify if:
- Have an uncontrolled, unstable clinically significant medical condition.
- Have any other psychiatric disorder other than schizophrenia as a primary diagnosis including depression.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Organon and Colead
Related Publications (1)
Buchanan RW, Panagides J, Zhao J, Phiri P, den Hollander W, Ha X, Kouassi A, Alphs L, Schooler N, Szegedi A, Cazorla P. Asenapine versus olanzapine in people with persistent negative symptoms of schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb;32(1):36-45. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31823f880a.
PMID: 22198451RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development
- Organization
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2005
First Posted
September 5, 2005
Study Start
December 1, 2004
Primary Completion
November 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
February 8, 2022
Results First Posted
March 25, 2010
Record last verified: 2022-02