NCT00145301

Brief Summary

This trial will compare the retention on treatment (based on the rate of patients staying on treatment for 1 year) of patients suffering from primary osteoarthritis using two different doses of lumiracoxib (100 mg od or 100 mg bid) or using celecoxib (200 mg od)

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3,036

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2004

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 1, 2005

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 5, 2005

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2005

Completed
Last Updated

May 21, 2012

Status Verified

May 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

September 1, 2005

Last Update Submit

May 18, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, lumiracoxib, retention on treatment, efficacy, safety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To show that either regimen of lumiracoxib (100mg od or 100mg bid) is not inferior to celecoxib 200mg od with respect to retention rate at 1 year in pts suffering from primary OA in hip, knee, hand or spine.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Safety & tolerability of pts using lumiracoxib vs pts using celecoxib

  • Efficacy of lumiracoxib vs celecoxib with respect to Patient's assessment of OA pain, Patient's global assessment of disease activity, and Physician's global assessment of disease activity

  • To compare reasons for discontinuation from treatment with lumiracoxib vs treatment with celecoxib

  • To validate the psychometric properties of the Short Arthritis assessment Scale (SAS) by analyzing pt reported outcomes collected in this study

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years+
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Primary osteoarthritis in the hip, knee, hand, or spine
  • Requiring NSAID therapy

You may not qualify if:

  • Secondary OA with history and/ or any evidence of the following diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, uncontrolled gout, inflammatory joint disease, ochronosis, acromegaly, hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, primary osteochondromatosis, heritable disorders (e.g. hypermobility), collagen gene mutations, primary fibromyalgia (secondary fibromyalgia is allowed if in the opinion of the investigator it will not interfere with the patient's OA pain assessment), and systemic lupus erythematosus
  • History and/ or any evidence of the following diseases in the target joint: septic arthritis, gout, recurrent episodes of pseudogout, Paget's disease of the bone, and articular fracture. If the patient has history of these conditions, then patient should only be excluded if the target joint is affected.
  • History of severe adverse reactions of any kind under lumiracoxib or celecoxib treatment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Novartis

Nuremberg, Germany

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Fleischmann R, Tannenbaum H, Patel NP, Notter M, Sallstig P, Reginster JY. Long-term retention on treatment with lumiracoxib 100 mg once or twice daily compared with celecoxib 200 mg once daily: a randomised controlled trial in patients with osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Mar 7;9:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-32.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis

Interventions

lumiracoxib

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2005

First Posted

September 5, 2005

Study Start

September 1, 2004

Primary Completion

November 1, 2005

Last Updated

May 21, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-05

Locations