52 Week, International, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Clinical Trial to Compare Retention on Treatment, Safety, Tolerability & Efficacy of Lumiracoxib 100 mg od, Lumiracoxib 100 mg Bid & Celecoxib 200 mg od in Pts With Primary OA of Hip, Knee, Hand or Spine
A 52-week, International, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel-group Clinical Trial to Compare Retention on Treatment, Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Lumiracoxib 100 mg od, Lumiracoxib 100 mg Bid and Celecoxib 200 mg od in Patients With Primary Osteoarthritis of Hip, Knee, Hand or Spine
1 other identifier
interventional
3,036
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This trial will compare the retention on treatment (based on the rate of patients staying on treatment for 1 year) of patients suffering from primary osteoarthritis using two different doses of lumiracoxib (100 mg od or 100 mg bid) or using celecoxib (200 mg od)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 5, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2005
CompletedMay 21, 2012
May 1, 2012
1.2 years
September 1, 2005
May 18, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To show that either regimen of lumiracoxib (100mg od or 100mg bid) is not inferior to celecoxib 200mg od with respect to retention rate at 1 year in pts suffering from primary OA in hip, knee, hand or spine.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Safety & tolerability of pts using lumiracoxib vs pts using celecoxib
Efficacy of lumiracoxib vs celecoxib with respect to Patient's assessment of OA pain, Patient's global assessment of disease activity, and Physician's global assessment of disease activity
To compare reasons for discontinuation from treatment with lumiracoxib vs treatment with celecoxib
To validate the psychometric properties of the Short Arthritis assessment Scale (SAS) by analyzing pt reported outcomes collected in this study
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary osteoarthritis in the hip, knee, hand, or spine
- Requiring NSAID therapy
You may not qualify if:
- Secondary OA with history and/ or any evidence of the following diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, uncontrolled gout, inflammatory joint disease, ochronosis, acromegaly, hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, primary osteochondromatosis, heritable disorders (e.g. hypermobility), collagen gene mutations, primary fibromyalgia (secondary fibromyalgia is allowed if in the opinion of the investigator it will not interfere with the patient's OA pain assessment), and systemic lupus erythematosus
- History and/ or any evidence of the following diseases in the target joint: septic arthritis, gout, recurrent episodes of pseudogout, Paget's disease of the bone, and articular fracture. If the patient has history of these conditions, then patient should only be excluded if the target joint is affected.
- History of severe adverse reactions of any kind under lumiracoxib or celecoxib treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Novartislead
Study Sites (1)
Novartis
Nuremberg, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Fleischmann R, Tannenbaum H, Patel NP, Notter M, Sallstig P, Reginster JY. Long-term retention on treatment with lumiracoxib 100 mg once or twice daily compared with celecoxib 200 mg once daily: a randomised controlled trial in patients with osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Mar 7;9:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-32.
PMID: 18328090DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2005
First Posted
September 5, 2005
Study Start
September 1, 2004
Primary Completion
November 1, 2005
Last Updated
May 21, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-05