Electronic Health Records for Health Promotion
Health Promotion in the Workplace Using Personally Controlled Health Records
1 other identifier
interventional
700
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether personally controlled electronic health records can be used for health promotion in a workplace setting.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2005
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 2, 2005
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2006
CompletedApril 5, 2007
January 1, 2006
August 31, 2005
April 4, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
- Rate of influenza immunization among subjects
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change in knowledge, attitutes, and beliefs regarding influenza and influenza immunization.
Changes in health behaviors around influenza (e.g. hand washing and cough etiquette).
General health outcomes related to respiratory illnesses (e.g. number of influenza-like illnesses, number of physician visits, number of missed work days).
Rate of influenza immunization among subject household members.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject is a part-time or full-time employee at a major corporation.
- The subject is eighteen years of age or older.
- The subject is comfortable reading and writing in English.
- The subject has reliable internet access at home, at school, or at work.
- The subject uses email regularly (i.e. at least once every 2 days)
- The subject does not have a known allergy to chicken eggs or a history of a severe reaction to an influenza vaccination in the past.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Hospital Boston
Boston, Massachusetts, 02116, United States
Related Publications (9)
Nichol KL. Cost-benefit analysis of a strategy to vaccinate healthy working adults against influenza. Arch Intern Med. 2001 Mar 12;161(5):749-59. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.5.749.
PMID: 11231710BACKGROUNDKeech M, Scott AJ, Ryan PJ. The impact of influenza and influenza-like illness on productivity and healthcare resource utilization in a working population. Occup Med (Lond). 1998 Feb;48(2):85-90. doi: 10.1093/occmed/48.2.85.
PMID: 9614766BACKGROUNDHarper SA, Fukuda K, Uyeki TM, Cox NJ, Bridges CB; Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention and control of influenza. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005 Jul 29;54(RR-8):1-40.
PMID: 16086456BACKGROUNDBridges CB, Thompson WW, Meltzer MI, Reeve GR, Talamonti WJ, Cox NJ, Lilac HA, Hall H, Klimov A, Fukuda K. Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000 Oct 4;284(13):1655-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.13.1655.
PMID: 11015795BACKGROUNDMandl KD, Szolovits P, Kohane IS. Public standards and patients' control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private. BMJ. 2001 Feb 3;322(7281):283-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7281.283. No abstract available.
PMID: 11157533BACKGROUNDRiva A, Mandl KD, Oh DH, Nigrin DJ, Butte A, Szolovits P, Kohane IS. The personal internetworked notary and guardian. Int J Med Inform. 2001 Jun;62(1):27-40. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(00)00136-2.
PMID: 11340004BACKGROUNDMandl KD, Overhage JM, Wagner MM, Lober WB, Sebastiani P, Mostashari F, Pavlin JA, Gesteland PH, Treadwell T, Koski E, Hutwagner L, Buckeridge DL, Aller RD, Grannis S. Implementing syndromic surveillance: a practical guide informed by the early experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):141-50. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1356. Epub 2003 Nov 21.
PMID: 14633933BACKGROUNDHeffernan R, Mostashari F, Das D, Karpati A, Kulldorff M, Weiss D. Syndromic surveillance in public health practice, New York City. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 May;10(5):858-64. doi: 10.3201/eid1005.030646.
PMID: 15200820BACKGROUNDBourgeois FT, Simons WW, Olson K, Brownstein JS, Mandl KD. Evaluation of influenza prevention in the workplace using a personally controlled health record: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2008 Mar 14;10(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/jmir.984.
PMID: 18343794DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenneth D Mandl, MD, MPH
Boston Children's Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2005
First Posted
September 2, 2005
Study Start
October 1, 2005
Study Completion
May 1, 2006
Last Updated
April 5, 2007
Record last verified: 2006-01