Endobronchial Valve for Emphysema PalliatioN Trial (VENT) Cost-effectiveness Sub-Study
1 other identifier
interventional
270
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the VENT Cost-Effectiveness Sub-Study is to gather healthcare utilization and quality of life information on patients enrolled in the VENT study in order to analyze the relative cost-effectiveness of the endobronchial valve implant procedure.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2005
CompletedAugust 18, 2009
August 1, 2009
August 26, 2005
August 14, 2009
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The cost-effectiveness ratio in the treatment group as compared to the control group at 180 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The cost-effectiveness ratio in the treatment group of the study will be compared to established therapies and standards.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) with eligible heterogeneous disease distribution
- Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) \< 45% predicted
- Total lung capacity (TLC) \> 100% predicted
- Residual volume (RV) \> 150% predicted
- Post rehabilitation 6 minute walk test \> 140m
- Non-smoking for 4 months
You may not qualify if:
- Prior lung transplant, lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), median sternotomy, bullectomy or lobectomy
- History of recurrent respiratory infections
- Evidence of large bullae (\> 30% of either lung) in a non-target lobe
- FEV1 \< 15% predicted
- Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) \< 20% predicted
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Emphasys Medicallead
Related Publications (25)
Gold M, Franks P, Erickson P. Assessing the health of the nation. The predictive validity of a preference-based measure and self-rated health. Med Care. 1996 Feb;34(2):163-77. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199602000-00008.
PMID: 8632690BACKGROUNDFeeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW. Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Jun;7(6):490-502. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00004.
PMID: 10155335BACKGROUNDHays RD, Woolley JM. The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it? Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Nov;18(5):419-23. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018050-00001.
PMID: 11151395BACKGROUNDTorrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, Boyle M. Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Jun;7(6):503-20. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00005.
PMID: 10155336BACKGROUNDWare JE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):903-12. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00081-x.
PMID: 9817107BACKGROUNDRamsey SD, Sullivan SD, Kaplan RM, Wood DE, Chiang YP, Wagner JL. Economic analysis of lung volume reduction surgery as part of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial. NETT Research Group. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Mar;71(3):995-1002. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02283-9.
PMID: 11269488BACKGROUNDRamsey SD, Berry K, Etzioni R, Kaplan RM, Sullivan SD, Wood DE; National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group. Cost effectiveness of lung-volume-reduction surgery for patients with severe emphysema. N Engl J Med. 2003 May 22;348(21):2092-102. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa030448. Epub 2003 May 20.
PMID: 12759480BACKGROUNDDiabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Within-trial cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention or metformin for the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003 Sep;26(9):2518-23. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.9.2518.
PMID: 12941712BACKGROUNDKaplan RM. Value judgment in the Oregon Medicaid experiment. Med Care. 1994 Oct;32(10):975-88. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199410000-00001.
PMID: 7934274BACKGROUNDSieber WJ, David KM, Adams JE, Kaplan RM, Ganiats TG. Assessing the impact of migraine on health-related quality of life: An additional use of the quality of well-being scale-self-administered. Headache. 2000 Sep;40(8):662-71. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2000.040008662.x.
PMID: 10971663BACKGROUNDKaplan RM, Atkins CJ, Timms R. Validity of a quality of well-being scale as an outcome measure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Chronic Dis. 1984;37(2):85-95. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(84)90050-x.
PMID: 6420431BACKGROUNDKaplan RM, Anderson JP, Patterson TL, McCutchan JA, Weinrich JD, Heaton RK, Atkinson JH, Thal L, Chandler J, Grant I. Validity of the Quality of Well-Being Scale for persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection. HNRC Group. HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center. Psychosom Med. 1995 Mar-Apr;57(2):138-47. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199503000-00006.
PMID: 7792372BACKGROUNDOrenstein DM, Kaplan RM. Measuring the quality of well-being in cystic fibrosis and lung transplantation. The importance of the area under the curve. Chest. 1991 Oct;100(4):1016-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.100.4.1016.
PMID: 1914549BACKGROUNDOrenstein DM, Pattishall EN, Nixon PA, Ross EA, Kaplan RM. Quality of well-being before and after antibiotic treatment of pulmonary exacerbation in patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest. 1990 Nov;98(5):1081-4. doi: 10.1378/chest.98.5.1081.
PMID: 2225948BACKGROUNDKaplan RM, Hartwell SL, Wilson DK, Wallace JP. Effects of diet and exercise interventions on control and quality of life in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Gen Intern Med. 1987 Jul-Aug;2(4):220-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02596443.
PMID: 3302144BACKGROUNDGaniats TG, Palinkas LA, Kaplan RM. Comparison of Quality of Well-Being scale and Functional Status Index in patients with atrial fibrillation. Med Care. 1992 Oct;30(10):958-64. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199210000-00008. No abstract available.
PMID: 1405801BACKGROUNDSquier HC, Ries AL, Kaplan RM, Prewitt LM, Smith CM, Kriett JM, Jamieson SW. Quality of well-being predicts survival in lung transplantation candidates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Dec;152(6 Pt 1):2032-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.6.8520772.
PMID: 8520772BACKGROUNDBombardier C, Ware J, Russell IJ, Larson M, Chalmers A, Read JL. Auranofin therapy and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a multicenter trial. Am J Med. 1986 Oct;81(4):565-78. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90539-5.
PMID: 3532786BACKGROUNDKaplan RM. Quality of life assessment for cost/utility studies in cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 1993;19 Suppl A:85-96. doi: 10.1016/0305-7372(93)90061-u.
PMID: 7679324BACKGROUNDKaplan RM. Decisions about prostate cancer screening in managed care. Curr Opin Oncol. 1997 Sep;9(5):480-6. doi: 10.1097/00001622-199709050-00014.
PMID: 9327227BACKGROUNDPatterson TL, Kaplan RM, Grant I, Semple SJ, Moscona S, Koch WL, Harris MJ, Jeste DV. Quality of well-being in late-life psychosis. Psychiatry Res. 1996 Jul 31;63(2-3):169-81. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(96)02797-7.
PMID: 8878313BACKGROUNDWeinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB. Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 1996 Oct 16;276(15):1253-8.
PMID: 8849754BACKGROUNDRussell LB, Gold MR, Siegel JE, Daniels N, Weinstein MC. The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 1996 Oct 9;276(14):1172-7.
PMID: 8827972BACKGROUNDWeinstein MC, Stason WB. Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. N Engl J Med. 1977 Mar 31;296(13):716-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197703312961304.
PMID: 402576BACKGROUNDRies AL, Kaplan RM, Myers R, Prewitt LM. Maintenance after pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic lung disease: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar 15;167(6):880-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200204-318OC. Epub 2002 Dec 27.
PMID: 12505859BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robert Kaplan, PhD
UCLA School of Public Health, UCSD Health Outcomes Assessment Program (HOAP)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2005
First Posted
August 30, 2005
Study Start
December 1, 2004
Last Updated
August 18, 2009
Record last verified: 2009-08