Gabapentin for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether gabapentin is safe and effective in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Oct 2003
Typical duration for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2006
CompletedOctober 31, 2007
October 1, 2007
August 29, 2005
October 30, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Global symptom score (GSS) recorded by a physician blinded to the allocation of treatment at 8 weeks
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
GSS at 2 weeks
2 weeks
Grip strength as functional assessment at 2 and 8 weeks
2 weeks, 8 weeks
Tolerability
throughout subject's participation in trial
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORGabapentin
2
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Sensory symptoms over median nerve distribution for more than three months.
- Confirmatory electrophysiologic results defined as prolonged median nerve distal motor latencies (DML) \> 4 ms or median-ulnar palmer sensory latency differences \> 0.5 ms.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with evidence of severe CTS: fibrillation potentials or reinnervation on needle examination of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle or clinical examination showing wastage of the thenar muscles. (These patients were referred for surgical decompression on presentation.)
- Clinical or electrophysiological evidence of accompanying conditions that could mimic CTS or interfere with its evaluation, such as proximal median neuropathy, cervical radiculopathy, or significant polyneuropathy.
- Known epilepsy.
- Patients who have received previous steroid injection or oral steroid therapy for CTS.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chinese University of Hong Konglead
- Pfizercollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Prince of Wales Hospital
Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
North District Hospital
Sheung Shui, New Territories, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew CF Hui, FHKAM
Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2005
First Posted
August 30, 2005
Study Start
October 1, 2003
Study Completion
December 1, 2006
Last Updated
October 31, 2007
Record last verified: 2007-10