NCT00136058

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to determine if an intervention with a fracture manager to arrange bone densitometry after a hip fracture is more effective in diagnosing and treating osteoporosis when compared to "usual care". "Usual care" consists of no intervention to arrange bone mineral density (BMD) testing or therapy other than what normally occurs in the community. The investigators postulate that a fracture manager will be more effective in getting BMD done and in starting appropriate therapy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
250

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2002

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2002

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 25, 2005

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 26, 2005

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2006

Completed
Last Updated

December 16, 2011

Status Verified

December 1, 2011

First QC Date

August 25, 2005

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

osteoporosiship fracture

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • the number of patients who get a BMD and the number who are started on active osteoporosis therapy

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ages 50 or over; males or females.
  • Reside in the community or have access to bone densitometry
  • Hip fracture
  • Patient can consent or proxy consent available
  • No contraindications to bisphosphonates

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient refuses consent process
  • Already receiving active drug therapy for osteoporosis other than calcium and vitamin D
  • Dementia or delirium
  • Pathological fracture
  • Chronic corticosteroid therapy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G2S2, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

OsteoporosisHip Fractures

Interventions

Absorptiometry, PhotonAlendronateRisedronic Acid

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bone Diseases, MetabolicBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesFemoral FracturesFractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesHip InjuriesLeg Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

RadiographyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisDensitometryPhotometryChemistry Techniques, AnalyticalInvestigative TechniquesDiphosphonatesOrganophosphonatesOrganophosphorus CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsPyridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Donald W Morrish, MD, PhD

    University of Alberta

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2005

First Posted

August 26, 2005

Study Start

January 1, 2002

Study Completion

April 1, 2006

Last Updated

December 16, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-12

Locations