Evaluation of Spirometry Expert Support in General Practice
A Randomized-Controlled Evaluation of Spirometry Expert Support in General Practice
3 other identifiers
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
More and more general practitioners (GPs) use spirometry in their practices. At this time, there is sufficient reason to presume that, after a single postgraduate training program without any further support, most GPs have insufficient knowledge and ability to assure valid interpretation of their spirometry tests. Therefore, some kind of continuous diagnostic support with regard to spirometry interpretation by GPs is advisable. The aim of the present study is to assess whether implementation of spirometry expert support (either by a computerised expert system or a working agreement between general practitioners and respiratory consultants with respect to spirometry interpretation) causes changes in diagnosing and appropriateness and efficiency of medical care in subjects with chronic respiratory morbidity managed in general practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2003
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 16, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2006
CompletedMarch 1, 2007
February 1, 2007
August 16, 2005
February 28, 2007
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Study I: between-group difference in the proportion of cases in which the GP opts for the gold standard diagnosis before versus expert/sham information
Study II: between-group difference in the proportion of patients with a changed respiratory diagnosis after spirometry interpretation in a random sample (n=20 patients) taken from an index population per practice
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Study I: between-group difference in the proportion of cases in which the GP opts for the gold standard treatment (prescription, referrals) before versus after the addition of expert/sham information
Study II: between-group difference in the proportion of ordered additional investigations and referrals by GPs
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- GP practices with a Windows supported electronic Patient Journal System (PJS) in a certain postal region in the Netherlands.
You may not qualify if:
- GP practices without a Windows supported PJS
- Practices outside a certain postcode region
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radboud University Medical Centerlead
- ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Developmentcollaborator
- Boehringer Ingelheimcollaborator
- The Netherlands Asthma Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6500 HB, Netherlands
Related Publications (3)
Chavannes N, Schermer T, Akkermans R, Jacobs JE, van de Graaf G, Bollen R, van Schayck O, Bottema B. Impact of spirometry on GPs' diagnostic differentiation and decision-making. Respir Med. 2004 Nov;98(11):1124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.04.004.
PMID: 15526814BACKGROUNDSchermer TR, Jacobs JE, Chavannes NH, Hartman J, Folgering HT, Bottema BJ, van Weel C. Validity of spirometric testing in a general practice population of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thorax. 2003 Oct;58(10):861-6. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.10.861.
PMID: 14514938BACKGROUNDPoels PJ, Schermer TR, Thoonen BP, Jacobs JE, Akkermans RP, de Vries Robbe PF, Quanjer PH, Bottema BJ, van Weel C. Spirometry expert support in family practice: a cluster-randomised trial. Prim Care Respir J. 2009 Sep;18(3):189-97. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2009.00047.
PMID: 19649513DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chris van Weel, Prof
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 16, 2005
First Posted
August 17, 2005
Study Start
January 1, 2003
Study Completion
August 1, 2006
Last Updated
March 1, 2007
Record last verified: 2007-02