Comparison of Valsartan With Amlodipine in Hypertensive Patients With Glucose Intolerance
The Novel Antihypertensive Goal Of hYpertension With diAbetes - Hypertensive Events and ARb Treatment (NAGOYA-HEART) Study
1 other identifier
interventional
1,150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Various guidelines recommended angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin â…¡ receptor-1 blockers (ARBs) for hypertensive patients with diabetes on the basis of the cardiac- and reno-protective effects of these drugs. However, these recommendations could not be extrapolated to Japanese patients, because Japan has been known as a country with a low incidence of coronary artery disease and a high incidence of cerebrovascular disease. Furthermore, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) also were protective against renal function as well as ACE inhibitors in Japanese diabetic hypertensive patients. This study will test whether ARBs or CCBs are superior in treating Japanese diabetic hypertensive patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 hypertension
Started Oct 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_4 hypertension
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 11, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2013
CompletedMay 1, 2013
April 1, 2013
5.8 years
August 10, 2005
April 29, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Composite cardiovascular events including fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal or non-fatal stroke, admission due to heart failure, coronary intervention and sudden cardiac death
At least 3 years of mean follow up period
Secondary Outcomes (5)
total death
At least 3 years of mean follow up period
cardiac function evaluated by ultrasonography
At least 3 years of mean follow up period
incidence of atrial fibrillation/flutter
At least 3 years of mean follow up period
control of blood glucose
At least 3 years of mean follow up period
renal function
At least 3 years of mean follow up period
Study Arms (2)
Valsartan
ACTIVE COMPARATORValsartan group treated with 80-160mg daily valsartan without Ca channel blockers or ACE inhibitors.
Amlodipine
ACTIVE COMPARATORAmlodipine group treated with 5-10mg daily amlodipine without ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of hypertension
- Clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance
You may not qualify if:
- History of congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization in the recent 6 months.
- Taking calcium channel blocker for the purpose of angina pectoris
- Reduced ejection fraction (\< 40%)
- Second- or third-degree of atrioventricular block
- Severe hypertension (\> 200/110 mmHg) or secondary hypertension
- History of stroke in the recent 6 months
- Serum creatinine \> 2.5 mg/dl
- Estimated survival duration less than 3 years due to other conditions
- Pregnant woman or possibly pregnant woman
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 466-8550, Japan
Related Publications (4)
Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, Brunner HR, Ekman S, Hansson L, Hua T, Laragh J, McInnes GT, Mitchell L, Plat F, Schork A, Smith B, Zanchetti A; VALUE trial group. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet. 2004 Jun 19;363(9426):2022-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16451-9.
PMID: 15207952BACKGROUNDYamashita K, Kondo T, Muramatsu T, Matsushita K, Nagahiro T, Maeda K, Shintani S, Murohara T. Effects of valsartan versus amlodipine in diabetic hypertensive patients with or without previous cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2013 Dec 1;112(11):1750-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.043. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
PMID: 24035165DERIVEDMuramatsu T, Matsushita K, Yamashita K, Kondo T, Maeda K, Shintani S, Ichimiya S, Ohno M, Sone T, Ikeda N, Watarai M, Murohara T; NAGOYA HEART Study Investigators. Comparison between valsartan and amlodipine regarding cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients with glucose intolerance: NAGOYA HEART Study. Hypertension. 2012 Mar;59(3):580-6. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.184226. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
PMID: 22232134DERIVEDMatsushita K, Muramatsu T, Kondo T, Maeda K, Shintani S, Murohara T; NAGOYA HEART Study Group. Rationale and design of the NAGOYA HEART Study: comparison between valsartan and amlodipine regarding morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension and glucose intolerance. J Cardiol. 2010 Jul;56(1):111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
PMID: 20409690DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Toyoaki Murohara, MD, PhD
Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Proffesor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2005
First Posted
August 11, 2005
Study Start
October 1, 2004
Primary Completion
July 1, 2010
Study Completion
April 1, 2013
Last Updated
May 1, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-04