High Dose Trial in COPD
A Randomized, Multiple-dose, Double-Blind, Crossover Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of 200 μg and 400 μg of BEA 2180 BR to Tiotropium 5 μg and Placebo When Each is Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
13
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 200 μg and 400 μg of BEA 2180 BR to tiotropium 5 μg and placebo when each was delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler once daily for four weeks in patients with COPD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2006
CompletedOctober 29, 2013
October 1, 2013
1.1 years
August 9, 2005
October 28, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Trough forced expiratory volume (FEV1) response
baseline to 24 hours post drug administration
forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) area under curve 3 to 6 hours (AUC0-6h) after four weeks of treatment.
after 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Trough FVC response after 4 weeks
after 4 weeks
FEV1 and FVC peak response after 0 and 4 weeks
after 0 and 4 weeks
FVC AUC0-6h after 0 and 4 weeks
after 0 and 4 weeks
Individual FEV1 and FVC measurements at each time point
4 weeks
Weekly mean pre-dose morning and evening PEFR
4 weeks
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (13)
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Lakewood, California, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Pembroke Farms, Florida, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Reno, Nevada, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Larchmont, New York, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Harker Heights, Texas, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
Tacoma, Washington, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2005
First Posted
August 10, 2005
Study Start
August 1, 2005
Primary Completion
September 1, 2006
Last Updated
October 29, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-10