NCT00124163

Brief Summary

Computed tomography (CT) colonography has gained widespread multi-disciplinary interest as an evolving noninvasive colorectal screening examination, with the potential of improved patient compliance. The investigator's prior work demonstrated that the bowel preparation was the least tolerable aspect of colorectal evaluation when compared to the CT colonography and optical colonoscopy procedures. Stool tagging could provide a more gentle and efficient bowel preparation, with fewer false positives due to retained stool-mimicking polyps. The researchers hypothesize that image quality and patient preference will vary with stool tagging concentration and dosing schedule. The researchers propose to evaluate specific stool tagging protocols with the following aims: AIM 1: Perform a randomized trial of three specific stool tagging protocols using barium and iodine at CT colonography in a well-characterized cohort of patients undergoing colorectal evaluation. AIM 2: Analyze the CT colonography and optical colonoscopy data to assess differences across stool tagging protocols for the outcome measures of patient preference, image quality in the presence of tagging, and diagnostic reader performance. The researchers will use specific variations in stool tagging techniques to determine the best image quality of CT data (e.g., homogenous tagging of fluid and stool), and highest patient acceptability, as well as evaluate the adequacy of preparation for same-day colonoscopy. Diagnostic reader performance will focus on the accuracy for detecting all neoplastic lesions including colon cancers, adenomatous polyps, sessile adenomas and flat adenomas. Most importantly, these results will help inform the design of a larger trial of an optimized CT colonography technique in a community setting.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2005

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 25, 2005

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 27, 2005

Completed
Last Updated

February 2, 2006

Status Verified

January 1, 2006

First QC Date

July 25, 2005

Last Update Submit

January 31, 2006

Conditions

Keywords

CT Virtual ColonoscopyOptical ColonoscopyStool TaggingPatient Preparation

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients who are 45 to 80 years old for routine screening colonoscopy

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with inflammatory bowel disease
  • Patients with polyposis syndromes
  • Pregnant women
  • Patients over 350 pounds
  • Patients with bright red blood per rectum
  • Patients who have a contraindication to undergo outpatient colonoscopy, including patients on blood thinners, prior myocardial infarction (MI) in the last six months, history of congestive heart failure (CHF), history of arrhythmia, patients too weak to transfer themselves from a bed to a chair, or patients with severe constipation who would require a two day bowel preparation.
  • All subjects will undergo informed consent by the St. Luke's institutional review board (IRB). Referred subjects will be asked if they are interested in the study and those responding affirmatively will be transferred to a recruiter to learn about the study and begin the consent process if interested.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Diagnostic Imaging Associates

Chesterfield, Missouri, 63017, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2191-200. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa031618. Epub 2003 Dec 1.

    PMID: 14657426BACKGROUND
  • Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Lamazza A, Schillaci A, Sinibaldi G, Murakami T, Sammartino P, Hori M, Piacentini F, Nofroni I, Stipa V, Passariello R. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2004 Nov;127(5):1300-11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.08.025.

    PMID: 15520999BACKGROUND
  • Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck BG. Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology. 2002 Aug;224(2):393-403. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2241011222.

    PMID: 12147834BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colonic NeoplasmsPolyps

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Colorectal NeoplasmsIntestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Elizabeth G. McFarland, MD

    St. Luke's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Elizabeth G. McFarland, MD

CONTACT

Elisabeth Quam-Berne

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2005

First Posted

July 27, 2005

Study Start

July 1, 2005

Last Updated

February 2, 2006

Record last verified: 2006-01

Locations