NAVISTAR® THERMOCOOL® Catheter for the Radiofrequency Ablation of Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Afib IDE
1 other identifier
interventional
167
5 countries
17
Brief Summary
This trial compares the safety and effectiveness of catheter ablation for PAF with antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The investigational catheter being studied is the NAVISTAR® THERMOCOOL® irrigated-tip catheter. At the time of this study, the NAVISTAR® THERMOCOOL® catheter was FDA-approved for commercial distribution in the U.S. for treating patients with Type I atrial flutter and drug refractory monomorphic ventricular tachycardia post myocardial infarction. The catheter was approved for use in Europe for endocardial ablation for treating cardiac arrhythmias.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Oct 2004
Longer than P75 for phase_3
17 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 30, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 14, 2013
CompletedOctober 24, 2017
September 1, 2017
3 years
June 29, 2005
February 11, 2013
September 22, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The Percentage of Chronic Success of the NAVISTAR THERMOCOOL Catheter for the Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF)
Chronic success was defined as freedom of documented symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation episodes based on electrocardiographic data and no changes in antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) regimen during comparable evaluation periods for the THERMOCOOL and AAD (Control) groups through 12 and 9 months of follow-up, respectively.
The evaluation time frame for the THERMOCOOL catheter subjects is 91-361 days (12 months) post procedure; for Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy subjects the time frame is 15-285 days (9 months) post procedure.
The Percentage of Subjects Who Experienced Incidences of Early Onset (Within 7 Days of Ablation Procedure) Serious Catheter-related Adverse Events
Catheter-related adverse events include death, myocardial infarction, pulmonary vein stenosis,diaphragmatic paralysis, atrio-esophageal fistula,transient ischemic attack,stroke,cerebrovascular accident, thromboembolism, pericarditis, cardiac tamponade,pericardial effusion,pneumothorax,atrial perforation,vascular access complications,pulmonary edema,hospitalization (initial and prolonged), and heart block.
Within 7 Days of Ablation Procedure
Secondary Outcomes (3)
The Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved Acute Success.
90 days post study procedure
Percentage of Subjects Who Experienced Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence During the Two-year Follow up.
During the two years of post procedure
Percentage of Subjects Responded to Each of the Four Health Status Categories.
During the two years of post procedure
Study Arms (2)
NAVISTAR® THERMOCOOL® Catheter
EXPERIMENTALAntiarrhythmic drug
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The Biosense Webster NAVISTAR® THERMOCOOL® Diagnostic/Ablation Deflectable Tip Catheter is a luminal catheter with a deflectable tip designed to facilitate electrophysiological mapping of the heart and to transmit radiofrequency current to the catheter tip electrode for ablation purposes.
Subjects randomized to the antiarrhythmic drug (control) arm will be prescribed to a not previously administered class I or class III antiarrhythmic drug that is currently approved in the U.S. for treating atrial fibrillation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with symptomatic PAF who have had three (3) AF episodes in the six (6) months prior to randomization, one of which must be documented. Documentation may include electrocardiogram (ECG), transtelephonic monitor (TTM), Holter monitor (HM), or telemetry strip.
- Failure of at least one AAD for PAF \[class I or III or AV nodal blocking agents such as beta blockers (BB) and calcium channel blockers (CCB)\] as evidenced by recurrent symptomatic PAF, or intolerable side effects due to AAD.
- Signed Patient Informed Consent Form.
- Age 18 years or older.
- Able and willing to comply with all pre-, post- and follow-up testing and requirements.
You may not qualify if:
- Atrial fibrillation secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or reversible or non-cardiac cause.
- Previous ablation for atrial fibrillation.
- Patients on amiodarone therapy at any time during the previous six (6) months.
- AF episodes that last longer than 30 days and are terminated via cardioversion.
- Any valvular cardiac surgical procedure.
- CABG procedure within the last 180 days (six months).
- Awaiting cardiac transplantation or other cardiac surgery within the next 360 days (12 months).
- Documented left atrial thrombus on imaging (e.g. TEE).
- History of a documented thromboembolic event within the past one (1) year.
- Diagnosed atrial myxoma.
- Presence of implanted ICD.
- Significant pulmonary disease, (e.g. restrictive pulmonary disease, constrictive or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) or any other disease or malfunction of the lungs or respiratory system that produces chronic symptoms.
- Significant congenital anomaly or medical problem that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude enrollment in this study.
- Women who are pregnant (by history of menstrual period or pregnancy test if the history is considered unreliable).
- Acute illness or active systemic infection or sepsis.
- +12 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (17)
Marin General Hospital
Greenbrae, California, 94904, United States
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32803, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Lahey Clinic Medical Center
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States
St. Lukes Roosevelt Hospital
New York, New York, 10025, United States
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642, United States
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43241, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29403, United States
The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano Baylor Research Institute
Plano, Texas, 75093, United States
Inova Fairfax Hospital
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042, United States
Hospital Sao Paulo
São Paulo, 04024-002, Brazil
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, H1T-iC8, Canada
Na Homolce Hospital
Prague, Motol, 150 30, Czechia
Hospital San Raffaele
Milan, 20132, Italy
Related Publications (2)
Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P, De Paola A, Marchlinski F, Natale A, Macle L, Daoud EG, Calkins H, Hall B, Reddy V, Augello G, Reynolds MR, Vinekar C, Liu CY, Berry SM, Berry DA; ThermoCool AF Trial Investigators. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010 Jan 27;303(4):333-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.2029.
PMID: 20103757RESULTReynolds MR, Walczak J, White SA, Cohen DJ, Wilber DJ. Improvements in symptoms and quality of life in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation treated with radiofrequency catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Nov;3(6):615-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957563. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
PMID: 20940250DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Melissa Schultz, Project Manager, Regulatory Affairs
- Organization
- Biosense Webster
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Wilber, MD
Loyola University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2005
First Posted
June 30, 2005
Study Start
October 1, 2004
Primary Completion
October 1, 2007
Study Completion
March 1, 2011
Last Updated
October 24, 2017
Results First Posted
March 14, 2013
Record last verified: 2017-09