Loading search results
A Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Trial to Compare the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of TMC114/RTV Versus LPV/RTV in Treatment-Experienced HIV-1 Infected Patients
Sponsor study identifier
Secondary identifiers
OTHER · Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland
interventional
604
26 countries
103
Study Start
April 2005
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
January 2007
Actual (reported)Study Completion
October 2011
Actual (reported)Study TMC114-C214 is a randomized, controlled, open-label trial to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of TMC114 boosted with low dose ritonavir (RTV) versus Kaletra (LPV)/RTV in lopinavir-naïve treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected patients.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
October 2011
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
April 2005
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
May 13, 2005
Actual (reported)May 16, 2005
Actual (reported)January 2007
Actual (reported)October 2011
Actual (reported)Number of Participants with Viral load <400 copies/mL per TLOVR algorithm at Week 48 (Per Protocol Population)
48 weeks
Number of Participants with Adverse Events
96 weeks
Number of Participants With Viral load <400 copies/mL per TLOVR Algorithm at Week 96 (Per Protocol Population)
96 Weeks
LPV/rtv One 400mg LPV tablet twice daily with 100mg RTV
TMC114/rtv Two 300mg TMC114 tablets twice daily with 100mg RTV
One 400mg LPV tablet twice daily with 100mg RTV
Two 300mg TMC114 tablets twice daily with 100mg RTV
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Long Beach, California, United States
Los Angeles, California, United States
San Francisco, California, United States
West Hollywood, California, United States
Madruga JV, Berger D, McMurchie M, Suter F, Banhegyi D, Ruxrungtham K, Norris D, Lefebvre E, de Bethune MP, Tomaka F, De Pauw M, Vangeneugden T, Spinosa-Guzman S; TITAN study group. Efficacy and safety of darunavir-ritonavir compared with that of lopinavir-ritonavir at 48 weeks in treatment-experienced, HIV-infected patients in TITAN: a randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet. 2007 Jul 7;370(9581):49-58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61049-6.
Banhegyi D, Katlama C, da Cunha CA, Schneider S, Rachlis A, Workman C, De Meyer S, Vandevoorde A, Van De Casteele T, Tomaka F. Week 96 efficacy, virology and safety of darunavir/r versus lopinavir/r in treatment-experienced patients in TITAN. Curr HIV Res. 2012 Mar;10(2):171-81. doi: 10.2174/157016212799937218.
Tibotec Pharmaceuticals Clinical Trial
Tibotec Pharmaceutical Limited
604 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
May 13, 2005
First Posted
May 16, 2005
Study Start
April 2005
Date type not reportedThis date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Denver, Colorado, United States
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Miami, Florida, United States
Orlando, Florida, United States
Safety Harbor, Florida, United States
Tampa, Florida, United States
Vero Beach, Florida, United States
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Macon, Georgia, United States
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Berkley, Michigan, United States
Camden, New Jersey, United States
East Orange, New Jersey, United States
Newark, New Jersey, United States
The Bronx, New York, United States
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Huntersville, North Carolina, United States
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Portland, Oregon, United States
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Austin, Texas, United States
Dallas, Texas, United States
Galveston, Texas, United States
Houston, Texas, United States
Longview, Texas, United States
Hampton, Virginia, United States
Seattle, Washington, United States
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Córdoba, Argentina
Rosario, Argentina
Darlinghurst, Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Perth, Australia
Surry Hills, Australia
Vienna, Austria
Antwerp, Belgium
Brussels, Belgium
Curitiba, Brazil
Distrito Barao Geraldo-Campina, Brazil
Nova Iguaçu, Brazil
Pinheiros, Brazil
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
São Paulo, Brazil
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Providencia, Chile
Santiago, Chile
Aalborg, Denmark
Nice, France
Paris, France
Rennes, France
Villejuif, France
Aachen, Germany
Berlin, Germany
Cologne, Germany
Düsseldorf, Germany
Hamburg, Germany
Mannheim, Germany
Osnabrück, Germany
Stuttgart, Germany
Melissia-Athens, Greece
Guatemala City, Guatemala
Budapest, Hungary
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Sungai Buloh, Malaysia
Guadalajara, Mexico
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Groningen, Netherlands
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Panama City, Panama
Lisbon, Portugal
Porto, Portugal
San Juan, Puerto Rico
Kazan', Russia
Moscow, Russia
Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Volgograd, Russia
Cape Town, South Africa
Durban, South Africa
Houghton, Johannesburg, South Africa
Johannesburg, South Africa
Pretoria, South Africa
Barcelona, Spain
Madrid, Spain
Zurich, Switzerland
Bangkok, Thailand
Khon Kaen, Thailand
London, United Kingdom
Primary Completion
January 2007
Actual (reported)Study Completion
October 2011
Actual (reported)Last Updated
July 3, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-07
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: