Tipifarnib Versus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
A Randomized Study of Tipifarnib Versus Best Supportive Care (Including Hydroxyurea) in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in Subjects 70 Years or Older (Farnesyl Transferase Inhibition Global Human Trials AML 301 [F.I.G.H.T. AML 301])
1 other identifier
interventional
457
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of tipifarnib in patients aged 70 or more with acute myeloid leukemia. Tipifarnib belongs to a class of drugs called Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitors (FTI). It blocks proteins that make leukemia cells grow.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jan 2004
Typical duration for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 7, 2004
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 11, 2004
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2007
CompletedSeptember 14, 2016
September 1, 2016
October 7, 2004
September 13, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall survival
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Compare patients treated with tipifarnib and patients treated with best supportive care: progression-free survival; complete remission rate; rate of morphologic leukemia-free state; one-year survival estimate and health resources utilization.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Newly diagnosed or re-lapsing AML
- Patient not medically fit for combination induction chemotherapy
- Pathologic confirmation of AML (= or \> 20% bone marrow leukemic blasts)
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, or 2.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous cytotoxic or biologic treatment for AML
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL)
- Central nervous system leukemia
- Uncontrolled systemic infection
- Uncompensated disseminated intravascular coagulation
- Symptomatic neuropathy of grade 2 or worse
- Known allergy to imidazole drugs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Harousseau JL, Martinelli G, Jedrzejczak WW, Brandwein JM, Bordessoule D, Masszi T, Ossenkoppele GJ, Alexeeva JA, Beutel G, Maertens J, Vidriales MB, Dombret H, Thomas X, Burnett AK, Robak T, Khuageva NK, Golenkov AK, Tothova E, Mollgard L, Park YC, Bessems A, De Porre P, Howes AJ; FIGHT-AML-301 Investigators. A randomized phase 3 study of tipifarnib compared with best supportive care, including hydroxyurea, in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in patients 70 years or older. Blood. 2009 Aug 6;114(6):1166-73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-198093. Epub 2009 May 21.
PMID: 19470696DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 7, 2004
First Posted
October 11, 2004
Study Start
January 1, 2004
Study Completion
October 1, 2007
Last Updated
September 14, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-09