Topotecan in Treating Women With Persistent or Recurrent Cervical Cancer
A Phase II Evaluation of Weekly Topotecan Hydrochloride (Hycamtin®, NSC #609699) in the Treatment of Persistent or Recurrent Carcinoma of the Cervix
2 other identifiers
interventional
27
1 country
27
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as topotecan, work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well topotecan works in treating women with persistent or recurrent cervical cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
27 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2004
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2004
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 8, 2019
CompletedJanuary 8, 2019
May 1, 2015
4.9 years
July 8, 2004
August 29, 2018
December 17, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Proportion of Patients With Objective Tumor Response Rate (Complete Response [CR] or Partial Response [PR]) Using RECIST Version 1.0
RECIST 1.0 defines complete response as the disappearance of all target lesions and non-target lesions and no evidence of new lesions documented by two disease assessments at least 4 weeks apart. Partial response is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest dimensions (LD) of all target measurable lesions taking as reference the baseline sum of LD. There can be no unequivocal progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions. Documentation by two disease assessments at least 4 weeks apart is required. In the case where the ONLY target lesion is a solitary pelvic mass measured by physical exam, which is not radiographically measurable, a 50% decrease in the LD is required. These patients will have their response classified according to the definitions stated above. Complete and partial responses are included in the objective tumor response rate.
CT scan or MRI if used to follow lesion for measurable disease every other cycle for the first 6 months; every 6 months thereafter until disease progression for up to 5 years.
Number of Participants With Adverse Effects as Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0
All participants assessed by CTCAE v3 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0) including grade 0 (the number of participants not affected by the Adverse Event).
Assessed every cycle while on treatment, 30 days after the last cycle of treatment, and up to 5 years in follow-up
Study Arms (1)
Topotecan
EXPERIMENTALTopotecan weekly
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gynecologic Oncology Grouplead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (27)
Lurleen Wallace Comprehensive Cancer at University of Alabama - Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294, United States
Kaiser Permanente Medical Center - Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781, United States
Olive View - UCLA Medical Center Foundation
Sylmar, California, 91342, United States
Helen and Harry Gray Cancer Center at Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102-5037, United States
George Bray Cancer Center at the Hospital of Central Connecticut - New Britain Campus
New Britain, Connecticut, 06050, United States
Yale Cancer Center
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520-8028, United States
Lakeland Regional Cancer Center at Lakeland Regional Medical Center
Lakeland, Florida, 33805, United States
Curtis & Elizabeth Anderson Cancer Institute at Memorial Health University Medical Center
Savannah, Georgia, 31403-3089, United States
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637-1470, United States
Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5289, United States
Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242-1002, United States
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231-2410, United States
William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak Campus
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073, United States
University of Mississippi Cancer Clinic
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216, United States
Regional Cancer Center at Singing River Hospital
Pascagoula, Mississippi, 39581, United States
Saint Louis University Cancer Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Methodist Estabrook Cancer Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114, United States
Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Charles M. Barrett Cancer Center at University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267, United States
Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1240, United States
Riverside Methodist Hospital Cancer Care
Columbus, Ohio, 43214-3998, United States
Mount Carmel Health - West Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43222, United States
David L. Rike Cancer Center at Miami Valley Hospital
Dayton, Ohio, 45409, United States
Oklahoma University Cancer Institute
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Cancer Care Associates - Midtown Tulsa
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104, United States
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Providence, Rhode Island, 02905, United States
Related Publications (1)
Fiorica JV, Blessing JA, Puneky LV, Secord AA, Hoffman JS, Yamada SD, Buekers TE, Bell J, Schilder JM; Gynecologic Oncology Group. A Phase II evaluation of weekly topotecan as a single agent second line therapy in persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Nov;115(2):285-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.07.024. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
PMID: 19726073RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Angela Kuras on behalf of James Kauderer
- Organization
- NRG Oncology
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
James V. Fiorica, MD
Sarasota Memorial Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2004
First Posted
July 12, 2004
Study Start
February 1, 2005
Primary Completion
January 1, 2010
Last Updated
January 8, 2019
Results First Posted
January 8, 2019
Record last verified: 2015-05