NCT00080808

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with nerve grafting followed by standard therapies for erectile dysfunction may be effective in helping patients with prostate cancer improve sexual satisfaction and quality of life. It is not yet known whether erectile dysfunction therapy and nerve-sparing prostatectomy are more effective with or without nerve grafting. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying nerve grafting and standard therapy to see how well they work compared to standard therapy alone in treating erectile dysfunction in patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
111

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2 prostate-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2001

Longer than P75 for phase_2 prostate-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2001

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 7, 2004

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2004

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2006

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2009

Completed
Last Updated

July 30, 2012

Status Verified

July 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

4.9 years

First QC Date

April 7, 2004

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

perioperative/postoperative complicationssexual dysfunction and infertilitysexuality and reproductive issuesadenocarcinoma of the prostatestage I prostate cancerstage II prostate cancerprostaglandin E1papaverinephentolamineNerve-sparing radical prostatectomynerve grafting

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Potency rate at 2 years after surgery

    2 years

Study Arms (2)

Arm I

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy with unilateral autologous interposition sural nerve grafting.

Drug: Alprostadil (E1)Drug: PapaverineDrug: Phentolamine mesylateDrug: Sildenafil citrateProcedure: conventional surgery

Arm II (No sural nerve grafting)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients undergo unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (without sural nerve grafting) and erectile dysfunction rehabilitation as in arm I.

Drug: Alprostadil (E1)Drug: PapaverineDrug: Phentolamine mesylateDrug: Sildenafil citrateProcedure: conventional surgery

Interventions

Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly

Also known as: Prostaglandin E1, PGE1
Arm IArm II (No sural nerve grafting)

Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly

Also known as: Paverine Injection, Papaverine Hydrochloride Injection
Arm IArm II (No sural nerve grafting)

Beginning 6 weeks after surgery, intracavernous Triplemix (prostaglandin E1, papaverine, and phentolamine) injected twice weekly

Arm IArm II (No sural nerve grafting)

Oral sildenafil as needed

Also known as: Viagra
Arm IArm II (No sural nerve grafting)

Unilateral cavernous nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy

Also known as: prostatectomy
Arm IArm II (No sural nerve grafting)

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 65 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient must be a candidate for a unilateral nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. a) Gleason score 7 or less in the cores on the side to be spared
  • Patient must have no discernable preoperative erectile dysfunction, defined as the ability to have successful penetration on at least 75% of attempts.
  • Patient must be \</= 65 years of age at the time of study enrollment.
  • Patient must have no peripheral neuropathy precluding procurement of a sural nerve graft
  • Patient must have no significant psychiatric illness or demonstrable vasculogenic source of impotence.
  • No prior history of pelvic irradiation or androgen deprivation therapy (LHRH agonists or anti-androgens)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas

Houston, Texas, 77030-4009, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Davis JW, Chang DW, Chevray P, Wang R, Shen Y, Wen S, Pettaway CA, Pisters LL, Swanson DA, Madsen LT, Huber N, Troncoso P, Babaian RJ, Wood CG. Randomized phase II trial evaluation of erectile function after attempted unilateral cavernous nerve-sparing retropubic radical prostatectomy with versus without unilateral sural nerve grafting for clinically localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1135-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.051. Epub 2008 Sep 2.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalInfertilitySexuality

Interventions

Alprostadilmethyl N-acetylsibirosaminidePapaverinePhentolamineSildenafil CitrateProstatectomy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSexual BehaviorBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostaglandins EProstaglandinsEicosanoidsFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFatty AcidsLipidsFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedAutacoidsInflammation MediatorsBiological FactorsBenzylisoquinolinesAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsOpiate AlkaloidsIsoquinolinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingSulfonamidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsSulfonesSulfur CompoundsPiperazinesPurinesUrologic Surgical Procedures, MaleUrologic Surgical ProceduresUrogenital Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • Christopher G. Wood, MD

    M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2004

First Posted

April 8, 2004

Study Start

August 1, 2001

Primary Completion

July 1, 2006

Study Completion

July 1, 2009

Last Updated

July 30, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-07

Locations