Cetuximab + Best Supportive Care Compared With Best Supportive Care Alone in Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Positive Colorectal Cancer
A Phase III Randomized Study of Cetuximab (Erbitux™, C225) and Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Patients With Pretreated Metastatic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Positive Colorectal Carcinoma
6 other identifiers
interventional
572
2 countries
33
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, can target tumor cells and either kill them or deliver tumor-killing substances to them without harming normal cells. Best supportive care is the use of drugs and other treatments to improve the quality of life of patients. Combining cetuximab with best supportive care may slow the growth of the tumor and help patients live longer and more comfortably. It is not yet known whether cetuximab combined with best supportive care is more effective than best supportive care alone in treating metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor-positive colorectal cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying cetuximab and best supportive care to see how well they work compared to best supportive care alone in treating patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor-positive colorectal cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
Started Dec 2003
Typical duration for phase_3 colorectal-cancer
33 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 30, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2004
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 3, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 10, 2009
CompletedAugust 4, 2023
April 1, 2020
2.8 years
March 8, 2004
August 3, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall survival
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Time to progression
Objective response rate
Quality of life by European Organization for Research of the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire -C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Health utilities by Health Utilities Index 13 (HU 13)
Economic evaluation
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (33)
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre
Camperdown, New South Wales, 1450, Australia
Cross Cancer Institute at University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada
British Columbia Cancer Agency - Centre for the Southern Interior
Kelowna, British Columbia, V1Y 5L3, Canada
Fraser Valley Cancer Centre at British Columbia Cancer Agency
Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 1Z2, Canada
British Columbia Cancer Agency - Vancouver Cancer Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6, Canada
British Columbia Cancer Agency - Vancouver Island Cancer Centre
Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 6V5, Canada
CancerCare Manitoba
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6, Canada
Moncton Hospital
Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 6ZB, Canada
Saint John Regional Hospital
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L2, Canada
Newfoundland Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 3V6, Canada
Nova Scotia Cancer Centre at Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9, Canada
Belleville General Hospital
Belleville, Ontario, K8N 5K5, Canada
Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario at Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5P9, Canada
Grand River Regional Cancer Centre at Grand River Hospital
Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 1G3, Canada
London Regional Cancer Program at London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 4L6, Canada
R. S. McLaughlin Durham Regional Cancer Centre at Lakeridge Health Oshawa
Oshawa, Ontario, L1G 2B9, Canada
Ottawa Hospital Regional Cancer Centre - General Campus
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
Hotel Dieu Health Sciences Hospital - Niagara
St. Catharines, Ontario, L2R 5K3, Canada
Northwestern Ontario Regional Cancer Care at Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre
Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7B 6V4, Canada
Toronto East General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M4C 3E7, Canada
Toronto Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Centre at Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
St. Michael's Hospital - Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
Mount Sinai Hospital - Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
St. Joseph's Health Centre - Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, M6R 1B5, Canada
Windsor Regional Cancer Centre at Windsor Regional Hospital
Windsor, Ontario, N8W 2X3, Canada
Prince Edward Island Cancer Centre at Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, C1A 8T5, Canada
Hopital Charles Lemoyne
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1, Canada
Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4MI, Canada
McGill Cancer Centre at McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1S6, Canada
Hopital Du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5, Canada
Allan Blair Cancer Centre at Pasqua Hospital
Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1, Canada
Saskatoon Cancer Centre at the University of Saskatchewan
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4, Canada
Related Publications (13)
Gupta A, O'Callaghan CJ, Zhu L, Jonker DJ, Wong RPW, Colwell B, Moore MJ, Karapetis CS, Tebbutt NC, Shapiro JD, Tu D, Booth CM. Evaluating the Time Toxicity of Cancer Treatment in the CCTG CO.17 Trial. JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Jun;19(6):e859-e866. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00737. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
PMID: 36881786BACKGROUNDAu HJ, Karapetis CS, O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Moore MJ, Zalcberg JR, Kennecke H, Shapiro JD, Koski S, Pavlakis N, Charpentier D, Wyld D, Jefford M, Knight GJ, Magoski NM, Brundage MD, Jonker DJ. Health-related quality of life in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab: overall and KRAS-specific results of the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 10;27(11):1822-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6048. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
PMID: 19273701RESULTJonker DJ, Karapetis C, Harbison C, et al.: High epiregulin (EREG) gene expression plus K-ras wild-type (WT) status as predictors of cetuximab benefit in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC): results from NCIC CTG CO.17-A phase III trial of cetuximab versus best supportive care (BSC).. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 27 (Suppl 15): A-4016, 2009.
RESULTAsmis TR, Powell E, Karapetis CS, Jonker DJ, Tu D, Jeffery M, Pavlakis N, Gibbs P, Zhu L, Dueck DA, Whittom R, Langer C, O'Callaghan CJ. Comorbidity, age and overall survival in cetuximab-treated patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC)--results from NCIC CTG CO.17: a phase III trial of cetuximab versus best supportive care. Ann Oncol. 2011 Jan;22(1):118-126. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq309. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
PMID: 20603436RESULTKarapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, Simes RJ, Chalchal H, Shapiro JD, Robitaille S, Price TJ, Shepherd L, Au HJ, Langer C, Moore MJ, Zalcberg JR. K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 23;359(17):1757-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804385.
PMID: 18946061RESULTMittmann N, Au HJ, Tu D, et al.: A prospective economic analysis of cost-effectiveness of cetuximab for metastatic colorectal cancer patients from the NCIC CTG and AGITG CO.17 trial. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-6528, 2008.
RESULTO'Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Karapetis CS, et al.: The relationship between the development of rash and clinical and quality of life outcomes in colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab in NCIC CTG CO.17. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-4130, 2008.
RESULTJonker DJ, Karapetis CS, Moore M, et al.: Randomized phase III trial of cetuximab monotherapy plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone in patients with pretreated metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive colorectal carcinoma: a trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) and the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG). [Abstract] American Association for Cancer Research: 98th Annual Meeting, April 14-18, 2007, Los Angeles, CA. 2007.
RESULTJonker DJ, O'Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, Zalcberg JR, Tu D, Au HJ, Berry SR, Krahn M, Price T, Simes RJ, Tebbutt NC, van Hazel G, Wierzbicki R, Langer C, Moore MJ. Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 15;357(20):2040-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071834.
PMID: 18003960RESULTNicholls DL, Xu MC, Zhan L, Sharma D, Hueniken K, Chiasson K, Wahba M, Brown MC, Grant B, Shapiro J, Karapetis CS, Simes J, Jonker D, Tu D, O'Callaghan C, Chen E, Liu G. Machine Learning Models of Early Longitudinal Toxicity Trajectories Predict Cetuximab Concentration and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Survival in the Canadian Cancer Trials Group/AGITG CO.17/20 Trials. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Apr;9:e2400114. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00114. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
PMID: 40215447DERIVEDGupta A, O'Callaghan CJ, Zhu L, Jonker DJ, Wong RPW, Colwell B, Moore MJ, Karapetis CS, Tebbutt NC, Shapiro JD, Tu D, Booth CM. The association of health-care contact days with physical function and survival in CCTG/AGITG CO.17. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024 Aug 1;116(8):1313-1318. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djae077.
PMID: 38656931DERIVEDLoree JM, Dowers A, Tu D, Jonker DJ, Edelstein DL, Quinn H, Holtrup F, Price T, Zalcberg JR, Moore MJ, Karapetis CS, O'Callaghan CJ, Waring P, Kennecke HF, Hamilton SR, Kopetz S. Expanded Low Allele Frequency RAS and BRAF V600E Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer as Predictive Biomarkers for Cetuximab in the Randomized CO.17 Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):52-59. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2710. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
PMID: 33087330DERIVEDHay AE, Pater JL, Corn E, Han L, Camacho X, O'Callaghan C, Chong N, Bell EN, Tu D, Earle CC. Pilot study of the ability to probabilistically link clinical trial patients to administrative data and determine long-term outcomes. Clin Trials. 2019 Feb;16(1):14-17. doi: 10.1177/1740774518815653. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
PMID: 30466310DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Derek Jonker, MD
Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre
- STUDY CHAIR
Chris Karapetis, MD
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2004
First Posted
March 9, 2004
Study Start
December 30, 2003
Primary Completion
November 3, 2006
Study Completion
February 10, 2009
Last Updated
August 4, 2023
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share