Middle School to High School Transition Project: Depression and Substance Abuse Prevention
CAST-T/HSTS
2 other identifiers
interventional
497
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will implement a school-based program to prevent depression, academic failure, and substance use in at-risk adolescents transitioning from middle school to high school.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 depression
Started Mar 2003
Longer than P75 for phase_1 depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2003
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 24, 2003
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 17, 2016
CompletedAugust 17, 2016
July 1, 2016
4.3 years
October 24, 2003
December 6, 2015
July 7, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ)
The Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire is a 13 item measure of level of self reported depressive symptoms. Each item in scored on a 3-point Likert scale as follows: "True" (0), "Sometimes" (1), and "Not True" (2) rated within the timeframe of the previous two weeks. A total score is obtained; scores can range from 0 to 26. Total scores of 12 or higher may signify that a child/adolescent is suffering from depression. Higher scores on this scale suggest a worse outcome or greater endorsement of depressive symptoms. Change is measured based on two time points baseline to the 18 months follow-up assessment.
Baseline to 18 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
School Attachment
18 months
Study Arms (2)
CAST-T/HSTS
EXPERIMENTALThe CAST-T/HSTS condition combined the Brief Intervention and 12 school based small group sessions which taught skills to enhance personal control (to manage depression, anger, stress), self-esteem, decision making and interpersonal communications. HSTS skills groups were held in the spring of 8th grade with 4 one-on-one booster sessions delivered to the students as 9th graders by HSTP leaders; parents also participated in 4 sessions. HSTS objectives are: 1) to increase the acquisition of coping skills competencies by teaching and practicing strategies taught; 2) to increase social support resources by building a supportive network; 3) to increase the youth's engagement in positive social activities; and 4) to motivate parents to increase their support via parent educational sessions.
Brief Intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORBrief Intervention: After each youth and parent completed baseline questionnaires the youth participated in a 1 on 1 standardized clinical follow-up with a trained clinician (blind to study condition) to review areas of concern, based on questionnaire responses including stressors at school, home, and with peers, level of support available and how to access support. The teen and clinician then planned a feedback call to parents, allowing teens to shape requests for support from parents as well as understand exactly what information would be shared with parents. Feedback call to parents reviewed concerns and made recommendations for services as needed. A similar procedure was followed after each assessment for all participants who indicated a risk of clinical depression or self-harm.
Interventions
Assessment of needs and referral to services as needed.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At-risk for substance abuse, academic failure, and depression
- Enrolled in eighth grade in Seattle Public Schools
- English-speaking
You may not qualify if:
- Score above the clinical cutoff on the Youth Self Report Aggressive subscale
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195, United States
Related Publications (7)
Lyon AR, Ludwig KA, Stoep AV, Gudmundsen G, McCauley E. Patterns and Predictors of Mental Healthcare Utilization in Schools and other Service Sectors among Adolescents at Risk for Depression. School Ment Health. 2013 Aug 1;5(3):10.1007/s12310-012-9097-6. doi: 10.1007/s12310-012-9097-6.
PMID: 24223677BACKGROUNDBanh MK, Crane PK, Rhew I, Gudmundsen G, Stoep AV, Lyon A, McCauley E. Measurement equivalence across racial/ethnic groups of the mood and feelings questionnaire for childhood depression. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012 Apr;40(3):353-67. doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9569-4.
PMID: 21996979BACKGROUNDRhew IC, Simpson K, Tracy M, Lymp J, McCauley E, Tsuang D, Stoep AV. Criterion validity of the Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire and one- and two-item depression screens in young adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2010 Feb 9;4(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-4-8.
PMID: 20181135BACKGROUNDKuo E, Vander Stoep A, McCauley E, Kernic MA. Cost-effectiveness of a school-based emotional health screening program. J Sch Health. 2009 Jun;79(6):277-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00410.x.
PMID: 19432868BACKGROUNDMcCormick E, Thompson K, Stoep AV, McCauley E. The Case for School-Based Depression Screening: Evidence From Established Programs. Rep Emot Behav Disord Youth. 2009 Fall;9(4):91-96.
PMID: 26451134BACKGROUNDBlossom JB, Adrian MC, Stoep AV, McCauley E. Mechanisms of Change in the Prevention of Depression: An Indicated School-Based Prevention Trial at the Transition to High School. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;59(4):541-551. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.05.031. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
PMID: 31228560DERIVEDMakover H, Adrian M, Wilks C, Read K, Stoep AV, McCauley E. Indicated Prevention for Depression at the Transition to High School: Outcomes for Depression and Anxiety. Prev Sci. 2019 May;20(4):499-509. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01005-5.
PMID: 30852711DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
A significant limitation of this trial was the brief nature of the comparison condition, the Brief Intervention group; findings might reflect "dose" rather than content of the CAST-T/HSTS intervention.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Elizabeth McCauley, PHD, Principal Investigator
- Organization
- Univeristy of Washington
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elizabeth McCauley, PhD
University of Washington
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ann Vander Stoep, PhD
University of Washington
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 24, 2003
First Posted
October 28, 2003
Study Start
March 1, 2003
Primary Completion
June 1, 2007
Study Completion
June 1, 2007
Last Updated
August 17, 2016
Results First Posted
August 17, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Add data has been de-identified. De-identified data is available to share.