Bortezomib With or Without Gemcitabine in Treating Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
A Randomized Phase II Trial of PS-341 and Gemcitabine in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
5 other identifiers
interventional
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Randomized phase II trial to compare the effectiveness of bortezomib with or without gemcitabine in treating patients who have metastatic pancreatic cancer. Bortezomib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking the enzymes necessary for tumor cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining bortezomib with gemcitabine may kill more tumor cells.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2003
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2007
CompletedOctober 8, 2013
October 1, 2013
4.8 years
January 24, 2003
October 7, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Confirmed tumor response (CR, PR) rate in 2 consecutive courses within 6 months (Arm I)
An evaluable patient will be classified as a treatment 'success' if they have a confirmed tumor response (CR, PR). The proportion of successes will be estimated by the total number of evaluable patients. 95% confidence intervals for the true proportion will be calculated according to the approach of Duffy and Santner.
Up to 6 months
Proportion of patients alive at 6 months (Arm II)
An evaluable patient will be classified a treatment 'success' if they are alive at 6 months. The proportion of successes will be estimated by the total number of evaluable patients. 95% confidence intervals for the true proportion will be calculated according to the approach of Duffy and Santner.
At 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Survival time
Time from randomization to death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Time to disease progression
Time from randomization to documentation of disease progression, assessed up to 5 years
Time to treatment failure
Time from the date of randomization to the date at which the patient is removed from the treatment due to progression, toxicity, or refusal, assessed up to 5 years
Study Arms (2)
Arm I
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive bortezomib IV over 3-5 seconds on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Patients with progressive disease crossover to arm II.
Arm II
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive bortezomib as in arm I and gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically confirmed metastatic ductal or undifferentiated adenocarcinoma consistent with a pancreatic primary for which no standard curative measures exist
- No locally advanced disease only
- No islet cell, acinar cell, or cystadenocarcinomas
- Measurable disease
- At least one lesion whose longest diameter can be accurately measured as 2 cm or greater by conventional techniques OR 1 cm or greater by spiral CT scan
- A tumor lesion in a previously irradiated area allowed provided it is histologically confirmed disease with radiographic progression from a post-radiotherapy CT scan
- No CNS metastasis
- Performance status - ECOG 0-2
- At least 3 months
- Absolute neutrophil count at least 1,500/mm\^3
- Platelet count at least 100,000/mm\^3
- Hemoglobin at least 9.0 g/dL
- Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) (stents allowed)
- AST no greater than 5 times ULN
- PT and PTT no greater than ULN\*
- +19 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
North Central Cancer Treatment Group
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven Alberts
North Central Cancer Treatment Group
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2003
First Posted
January 27, 2003
Study Start
December 1, 2002
Primary Completion
October 1, 2007
Last Updated
October 8, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-10