NCT00048568

Brief Summary

Short Term: The purpose of this clinical research study is to learn if abatacept (BMS-188667) in combination with methotrexate is better than methotrexate alone in participants that have active rheumatoid arthritis and are not responding to methotrexate. The safety of this treatment will also be studied. Long Term Extension: The purpose of this amendment is to provide participants who have completed the initial 12-month double-blind treatment period the opportunity to receive open label treatment with active drug treatment until abatacept is approved in the local country or until clinical development has been discontinued.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,250

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2002

Longer than P75 for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis

Geographic Reach
1 country

48 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 2, 2002

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 13, 2002

Completed
18 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2002

Completed
6.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2009

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2009

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 5, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

December 5, 2011

Status Verified

October 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

6.8 years

First QC Date

November 2, 2002

Results QC Date

March 28, 2011

Last Update Submit

October 26, 2011

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (27)

  • Number of American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR 20) Responders at Day 169

    ACR 20 response requires a patient to have a 20% reduction in the number of swollen and tender joints, and a reduction of 20% in three of the following five parameters: physician global assessment of disease, patient global assessment of disease, patient assessment of pain, C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and degree of disability in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score. A participant achieved a sustained ACR 20 response if the participant had ACR 20 observed for at least 2 consecutive study visits.

    Day 169

  • Number of Participants Achieving Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) at Day 365

    The HAQ-DI includes 20 questions to assess physical function in 8 domains: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities. The domain questions are evaluated on a 4-point scale: 0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty, 3=unable to do. HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain dividied by the number of domains answered. HAQ-DI ranges from 0 to a maximum overall score of 3.0. Clinically meaningful HAQ response was defined as an improvement of at least 0.3 units from baseline in HAQ DI.

    Day 365

  • Baseline and Mean Change From Baseline (BL) in Radiographic Erosion Score Results at Day 365

    To assess joint damage progression, the Genant-modified Sharp scoring method was used to evaluate radiographs of hands/wrists and feet for erosions. The erosion score range is 0 (no radiographic damage) to 145 (worst possible radiographic damage). Change from baseline = Post-baseline - Baseline value

    BL (Day 0), Day 365

  • Participants With Deaths, Adverse Events (AEs) and SAEs in the Open-Label (OL) Period

    AE was defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, results in development of drug dependency or drug abuse, is an important medical event.

    Day 365 to Day 2,185

  • Participants With Hematology Values Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria in the OL Period

    Marked abnormality criteria are: Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from BL; Hematocrit: \<0.75 \* BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 \* BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 \* LLN/\>1.5 \* ULN, or if BL \< LLN then use \<0.5 \* BL and \<100,000 mm\^3; Leukocytes: \<0.75 \* LLN/ \>1.25 \* ULN, or if BL\<LLN then use \<0.8 \* BL or \>ULN, or if BL\>ULN then use \>1.2 \* BL or \<LLN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 \* 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 \* 10\^3 c/uL; basophils: \> 400 mm\^3; monocytes: \>2000 mm\^3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 \* 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 \* 10\^3 c/uL.

    Day 365 to Day 2,185

  • Participants With Liver and Kidney Function Values Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria in the OL Period

    Marked abnormality criteria are: Hemoglobin (HGB): \>3 g/dL decrease from BL; Hematocrit: \<0.75 \* BL; Erythrocytes: \<0.75 \* BL; Platelets (PLT): \<0.67 \* LLN/\>1.5 \* ULN, or if BL \< LLN then use \<0.5 \* BL and \<100,000 mm\^3; Leukocytes: \<0.75 \* LLN/ \>1.25 \* ULN, or if BL\<LLN then use \<0.8 \* BL or \>ULN, or if BL\>ULN then use \>1.2 \* BL or \<LLN; neutrophils+bands: \<1.0 \* 10\^3 c/uL; eosinophils: \>0.750 \* 10\^3 c/uL; basophils: \> 400 mm\^3; monocytes: \>2000 mm\^3; lymphocytes: \<0.750 \* 10\^3 c/uL/ \>7.50 \* 10\^3 c/uL.

    Day 365 to Day 2,185

  • Participants With Electrolyte Values Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria in the OL Period

    Sodium \< 0.9 \* LLN or \> 1.05 \* ULN or if BL \< LLN then use \< 0.95 \* BL or \> ULN or if BL \> ULN then use \>1.05 \*BL or \< LLN; Potassium: \< 0.9 \* LLN or \> 1.1 \* ULN or if BL \< LLN then use \< 0.9 \* BL or \> ULN or if BL \> ULN then use 1.1 \* BL or \< LLN; Chloride: \< 0.9 \* LLN or \> 1.1 \* ULN or if BL \< LLN then use \<0.9 \* BL or \>ULN or if BL \> ULN then use \> 1.1 \* BL or \< LLN; Calcium \<0.8 \* LLN or \> 1.2 \* ULN or if BL \< LLN then use \<0.67 \* BL or \> ULN or if BL \> ULN then use \> 1.3 \* BL or \< LLN.

    Day 365 to Day 2,185

  • Participants With Glucose, Protein, Metabolites, and Urinalysis Values Meeting the Marked Abnormality Criteria in the OL Period

    Glucose: \< 65 mg/dL or \> 220 mg/dL; Fasting Glucose: \<0.8 \* LLN or \> 1.5 \* ULN or if BL \< LLN then use \< 0.8 \* BL or \> ULN or if BL \> ULN then use 1.1 \* BL or \< LLN; Total protein: \< 0.9 \* LLN or 1.1 \* ULN or if BL \< LLN then use 0.9 \* BL or \> ULN or if BL \> ULN then use 1.1 \* BL or \< LLN; Albumin: \< 0.9 \* LLN or if BL \< LLN then use 0.75 \* BL; Uric acid: \> 1.5 \* ULN or if BL \> ULN then use \> 2.0 \* BL. All urinalysis abnormalities were defined as: if missing BL then use \>= 2 or if value \>=4, or if BL = 0 or 0.5 then use \>= 2, or if BL = 1.0 then use \>= 3, or if BL = 2.0 then use \>=4.

    Day 365 to Day 2,185

  • Mean BL Immunoglobulins Over Time in the OL Period

    Mean baseline values are those that are reported for each cohort at each time point on Day 365, Day 729, and Day 1,093.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093

  • Mean Change From BL in Immunoglobulins in the OL Period

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093

  • Participants With Immunogenicity to Abatacept in the Cumulative DB + OL Period

    Participants with titers to abatacept in the DB and OL periods. Serum samples from abatacept-treated adult participants with active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) were screened for the presence of drug-specific antibodies using two validated direct-format enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) to determine the presence of antibodies to abatacept and or CTLA4-T.

    Day 1 to Day 1,821

  • Number of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs in the OL Period

    Vital signs included body temperature, heart rate, and seated blood pressure. Clinically significant changes were defined as those that were not within the normal range for the participant.

    Day 365 to Day 1,821. All changes in participant vital signs were monitored on each day of study drug administration prior to dosing and 60 minutes after dosing.

  • Number of Participants Experiencing AEs of Special Interest in the OL Period

    AEs were defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a pre- existing medical condition which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. AEs of special interest have been identified to be those which may be associated with the use of immunomodulatory agents or infusion of therapeutic proteins. Acute infusional AEs were defined as those that occurred within 1 hour after the start of the infusion.

    Day 365 to Day 2,185

  • Mean BL Hematocrit in the OL Period

    Mean baseline values are those that are reported for each cohort at each time point on Day 365 to Day 2,185.

    Baseline (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

  • Mean Change From BL in Participant Hematocrit in the OL Period

    All changes in participant laboratory parameters were monitored on each day of study drug administration.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

  • Mean BL Platelet Count in the OL Period

    Mean baseline values are those that are reported for each cohort at each time point on Day 365 to Day 2,185.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

  • Mean Change From BL in Participant Platelet Count in the OL Period

    All changes in participant laboratory parameters were monitored on each day of study drug administration.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

  • Mean BL Hemoglobin, Total Protein, and Albumin in the OL Period

    Mean baseline values are those that are reported for each cohort at each time point on Day 365 to Day 2,185.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

  • Mean Change From BL in Hemoglobin, Total Protein, and Albumin in the OL Period

    All changes in participant laboratory parameters were monitored on each day of study drug administration.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

  • Mean BL White Blood Cells in the OL Period

    Mean baseline values are those that are reported for each cohort at each time point on Day 365 to Day 2,185.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

  • Mean Change From BL in White Blood Cells in the OL Period

    All changes in participant laboratory parameters were monitored on each day of study drug administration.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

  • Mean BL Liver Function Parameters in the OL Period

    Mean baseline values are those that are reported for each cohort at each time point on Day 365 to Day 2,185.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

  • Mean Change From BL in Liver Function Parameters in the OL Period

    All changes in participant laboratory parameters were monitored on each day of study drug administration.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

  • Mean BL Select Laboratory Parameters in the OL Period

    Mean baseline values are those that are reported for each cohort at each time point on Day 365 to Day 2,185.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

  • Mean Change From BL in Select Laboratory Parameters in the OL Period

    All changes in participant laboratory parameters were monitored on each day of study drug administration.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

  • Mean BL Serum Electrolytes in the OL Period

    Mean baseline values are those that are reported for each cohort at each time point on Day 365 to Day 2,185.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

  • Mean Change From BL in Serum Electrolytes in the OL Period

    All changes in participant laboratory parameters were monitored on each day of study drug administration.

    BL (Day 0), Day 365, Day 729, Day 1,093, Day 1,457, Day 1,821, Day 1,905, Day 1,989, Day 2,073, Day 2,185

Secondary Outcomes (119)

  • Mean Number of Tender Joints and Swollen Joints at DB BL

    BL (Day 0)

  • Mean DB BL Participant Physical Pain Assessment, Participant Global Assessment, and Physician Global Assessment

    BL (Day 0)

  • BL Rheumatoid Factor (RF) Status for Participants Continuing in the OL Period

    BL (Day 365)

  • ACR 20 Responders at Day 365

    Day 365

  • ACR 20 Responders in the Double-Blind (DB) Period

    Day 15, Day 29, Day 57, Day 85, Day 113, Day 141, Day 169, Day 225, Day 281, Day 365

  • +114 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Abatacept + Methotrexate

EXPERIMENTAL

Short Term: Abatacept was dosed by weight with participants weighing \< 60 kg received abatacept 500 mg; participants ≥ 60 kg and ≤ 100 kg received abatacept 750 mg; and participants \> 100 kg received abatacept 1 g. Participants continued treatment with methotrexate (MTX) either orally or parenterally at a minimum dose of 15 mg.

Drug: AbataceptDrug: Methotrexate

Placebo + Methotrexate

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Short Term: Participants received a placebo solution intravenously and methotrexate at the dose employed prior to study enrollment and a minimum of 15 mg.

Drug: MethotrexateDrug: Placebo

Abatacept + Methotrexate Open Label

EXPERIMENTAL

Open Label: Abatacept was dosed intravenously by weight at 10 mg/kg in the OL period under tiered dosing such that participants weighing \< 60 kg received abatacept 500 mg; participants ≥ 60 kg and ≤ 100 kg received abatacept 750 mg; and participants \> 100 kg received abatacept 1 g. MTX was continued at the dose used in the DB period.

Drug: AbataceptDrug: Methotrexate

Interventions

Intravenous (IV) Solution, - Weight Titered (500 mg \< 60 kg); (750 mg 60-100 kg), )1 gram \> 100 kg), Day 1, Day 15, Day 29; every 28 days thereafter, 1 year

Also known as: BMS-188667
Abatacept + MethotrexateAbatacept + Methotrexate Open Label

Tablets, Oral, \>= 15 mg, weekly, 1 year

Also known as: MTX
Abatacept + MethotrexateAbatacept + Methotrexate Open LabelPlacebo + Methotrexate

IV solution, Intravenous, D5W, Day 1, Day 15, Day 29; every 28 days thereafter, 1 year

Placebo + Methotrexate

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
* Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) for greater than 1 year from the time of initial diagnosis of RA. * Participants must have been taking methotrexate for at least 3 months with at least a weekly dose of 15 mg.

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (48)

Local Institution

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Location

Local Institution

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Location

Local Institution

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Location

Local Institution

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Location

Local Institution

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Location

Local Institution

Corona, California, United States

Location

Local Institution

Irvine, California, United States

Location

Local Institution

La Jolla, California, United States

Location

Local Institution

Long Beach, California, United States

Location

Local Institution

Rancho Mirage, California, United States

Location

Local Institution

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Location

Local Institution

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Location

Local Institution

Denver, Colorado, United States

Location

Local Institution

Hamden, Connecticut, United States

Location

Local Institution

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Location

Local Institution

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Location

Local Institution

Gainsville, Florida, United States

Location

Local Institution

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Location

Local Institution

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Location

Local Institution

St. Petersburg, Florida, United States

Location

Local Institution

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Location

Local Institution

Rockford, Illinois, United States

Location

Local Institution

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Location

Local Institution

Coeur d'Alene, Maryland, United States

Location

Local Institution

Cumberland, Maryland, United States

Location

Local Institution

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Local Institution

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Location

Local Institution

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Location

Local Institution

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Location

Local Institution

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Location

Local Institution

Albany, New York, United States

Location

Local Institution

Binghamton, New York, United States

Location

Local Institution

Mineola, New York, United States

Location

Local Institution

New York, New York, United States

Location

Local Institution

Syracuse, New York, United States

Location

Local Institution

The Bronx, New York, United States

Location

Local Institution

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Location

Local Institution

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Location

Local Institution

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Local Institution

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Local Institution

Norristown, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Local Institution

Sellersville, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Local Institution

Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Local Institution

North Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Location

Local Institution

Austin, Texas, United States

Location

Local Institution

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Local Institution

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Location

Local Institution

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Kremer JM, Genant HK, Moreland LW, Russell AS, Emery P, Abud-Mendoza C, Szechinski J, Li T, Ge Z, Becker JC, Westhovens R. Effects of abatacept in patients with methotrexate-resistant active rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jun 20;144(12):865-76. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-12-200606200-00003.

  • Kremer JM, Peterfy C, Russell AS, Emery P, Abud-Mendoza C, Sibilia J, Becker JC, Westhovens R, Genant HK. Longterm safety, efficacy, and inhibition of structural damage progression over 5 years of treatment with abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the abatacept in inadequate responders to methotrexate trial. J Rheumatol. 2014 Jun;41(6):1077-87. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130263. Epub 2014 May 1.

  • Kremer JM, Genant HK, Moreland LW, Russell AS, Emery P, Abud-Mendoza C, Szechinski J, Li T, Teng J, Becker JC, Westhovens R. Results of a two-year followup study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who received a combination of abatacept and methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Apr;58(4):953-63. doi: 10.1002/art.23397.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Arthritis, Rheumatoid

Interventions

AbataceptMethotrexate

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesConnective Tissue DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImmunoconjugatesAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsSerum GlobulinsBlood ProteinsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsGlobulinsAminopterinPterinsPteridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
BMS Study Director
Organization
Bristol Myers-Squibb

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2002

First Posted

November 13, 2002

Study Start

December 1, 2002

Primary Completion

October 1, 2009

Study Completion

October 1, 2009

Last Updated

December 5, 2011

Results First Posted

December 5, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-10

Locations