NCT00042185

Brief Summary

This study evaluated 2 eating disorder prevention programs designed to increase body satisfaction among adolescent females with body image concerns.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
450

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2001

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2001

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 24, 2002

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 26, 2002

Completed
4.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2007

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2007

Completed
Last Updated

September 27, 2013

Status Verified

September 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

6.2 years

First QC Date

July 24, 2002

Last Update Submit

September 26, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

AdolescencePrevention and ControlBulimia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Eating Disorder Diagnostic Interview

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The Ideal-Body Stereotype Scale-Revised, Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Body Parts Scale, Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale-Revised

    1 year

Study Arms (4)

Dissonance intervention

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Dissonance Eating Disorder Prevention Program

Healthy Weight Intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Behavioral: Healthy Weight Intervention

Expressive writing control intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Behavioral: Expressive Writing Control Condition

Assessment-only control condition

NO INTERVENTION

Interventions

In this intervention, participants voluntarily engaged in verbal, written, and behavioral exercises in which they critiqued the thin-ideal ideal. These exercises were conducted in sessions and in homework activities. For example, they wrote a counter-attitudinal essay about the costs associated with pursuit of the thin-ideal and engaged in a counter-attitudinal role-play in which they attempted to dissuade facilitators from pursuing the thin-ideal.

Dissonance intervention

In this intervention, participants were encouraged to make gradual healthy and lasting changes to their diet and physical activity to balance their energy needs with their energy intake, and thereby achieve a healthier weight and body satisfaction. With support from the facilitator and group members, they initiated an individual lifestyle change plan to reduce intake of fat and sugar and to increase exercise using behavioral modification principles. Food and exercise diaries were used to identify behaviors to target in this lifestyle modification and to monitor change. Motivational enhancement activities were used to promote motivation for behavior change.

Healthy Weight Intervention

In this condition, which is based on the work of Pennebaker (1997), participants wrote about emotionally significant topics in three individual weekly 45-minute sessions. They were told that research indicates that body dissatisfaction is linked to emotional issues and that expressive writing helps resolve these issues. Sample topics included relationships or goals. They were told that their work would not be read and were asked to write continuously for the duration of the session about an emotionally important topic.

Expressive writing control intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age14 Years - 19 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Self-reported body image concerns

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Texas at Austin

Austin, Texas, 78712, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Stice E, Shaw H. Eating disorder prevention programs: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2004 Mar;130(2):206-27. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.206.

    PMID: 14979770BACKGROUND
  • Stice E, Fisher M, Martinez E. Eating disorder diagnostic scale: additional evidence of reliability and validity. Psychol Assess. 2004 Mar;16(1):60-71. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.16.1.60.

    PMID: 15023093BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Feeding and Eating DisordersBulimia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMental DisordersHyperphagia

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2002

First Posted

July 26, 2002

Study Start

February 1, 2001

Primary Completion

May 1, 2007

Study Completion

May 1, 2007

Last Updated

September 27, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-09

Locations