Comparison of Screening Tests in Detecting Cervical Neoplasia
Multi-Institutional Prospective Cohort Study For The Comparison Of Different Primary Screening Strategies For The Detection Of Cervical Neoplasia
3 other identifiers
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Screening tests may help doctors detect abnormal cells in the cervix early and plan effective treatment. PURPOSE: Screening trial to compare different types of screening tests used to detect cervical neoplasia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 1999
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 6, 2002
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2003
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2010
CompletedAugust 3, 2020
July 1, 2012
3.7 years
June 6, 2002
July 30, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- History of cervical neoplasia
- Presenting for a well-woman visit, annual Pap smear, or family planning
- Other gynecological or non-gynecological complaints allowed OR
- Referred for colposcopy secondary to an abnormal Pap smear
- Planned screening for cervical cancer
- Over 18 years of age
- Prior laser surgery, cryotherapy, or conization or loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical neoplasia allowed
You may not qualify if:
- bleeding diathesis
- pregnant
- prior hysterectomy
- concurrent anticoagulants
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Christine Holschneider, MD
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 6, 2002
First Posted
January 27, 2003
Study Start
December 1, 1999
Primary Completion
August 1, 2003
Study Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
August 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2012-07