A Comparison of Language Intervention Programs
1 other identifier
interventional
216
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Brief Summary: Nearly 7% of elementary school children present with difficulties learning and using language. Unfortunately, language impairments are often long lasting and may have serious social, academic, and vocational ramifications. More than 1 million children receive language intervention in the public schools each year, and many more are seen in hospitals and other clinical settings. This randomized clinical trial compares the language outcomes of Fast ForWord to two other interventions (computer assisted language intervention without acoustically modified speech and individual language intervention) and to the outcomes of an academic enrichment (control) condition. Each year for 3 years, children will be randomly assigned to each of the four conditions at three regional sites (Austin, Texas, Dallas, Texas, and Lawrence, Kansas). The treatments will be administered in special summer programs. The primary research question is which intervention results in the most improvement in the composite language score from the Oral and Written Language Scales. Secondary questions include which intervention results in the greatest gains in conversational language,which intervention results in the greatest gains 3 and 6 months after training, which intervention results in the greatest improvement in auditory perception, and which intervention is the most cost effective. The results of the study will have theoretical and practical value. Theoretically, the study tests the temporal processing hypothesis of language impairment. Practically, the study will describe and compare the language, communication, auditory processing and academic outcomes of different language interventions. The study will help clinicians and administrators choose the most effective and least expensive treatment for the children they serve.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jun 2002
Typical duration for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2002
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2002
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2002
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2005
CompletedApril 24, 2006
April 1, 2006
April 8, 2002
April 21, 2006
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age 6 to 9 years
- score between 75 and 125 on the Matrices subtest of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test
- Speaking Quotient of 79 or lower on the Test of Language Development: Primary: 3rd Edition
You may not qualify if:
- Previous participation in 8 or more hours of language intervention or classroom activities using any of the Fast ForWord, Laureate, or Earobics speech-language or reading software and/or the Lindamood-Bell auditory discrimination training
- Failure of a hearing screening test
- An episode of otitis media in the previous 12 months
- Evidence of focal brain lesion, traumatic brain injury, cerebral palsy, or seizure disorder
- Abnormality of oral structure or function impeding normal language production
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Lawrence Public Schools USD 497
Lawrence, Kansas, 66044, United States
Pflugerville Independent School District
Pflugerville, Texas, 78660, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ronald Gillam, PhD
Pflugerville Independent School District
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2002
First Posted
April 9, 2002
Study Start
June 1, 2002
Study Completion
January 1, 2005
Last Updated
April 24, 2006
Record last verified: 2006-04