Troxacitabine in Treating Patients With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
A Phase II Study Of Troxatyl In Patients With CML Blastic Phase Disease
3 other identifiers
interventional
31
2 countries
20
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop cancer cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. PURPOSE: Phase II trial to study the effectiveness of troxacitabine in treating patients who have blast phase chronic myelogenous leukemia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 leukemia
Started Dec 2000
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 leukemia
20 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 11, 2000
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2001
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 27, 2002
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 27, 2002
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2004
CompletedJune 10, 2021
June 1, 2021
1.3 years
March 3, 2001
June 7, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (16)
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 4
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 8
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 12
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 16
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 20
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 24
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 28
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 32
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 36
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 40
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 44
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 48
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 52
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 56
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 60
Conventional Response Rate
Conventional Response Rate defined as the achievement of complete hematologic remission (CHR), partial hematologic remission (PHR), hematologic improvement (HI), partial response (PR), or back to chronic phase (BCP).
Week 64
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Percent of Patients Returning to Chronic Phase
Throughout the study period of approximately 15 months.
Toxicity Profile
Every 4 weeks throughout the study period of approximately 15 months.
Survival Duration
Throughout the study period of approximately 15 months.
Study Arms (1)
troxacitabine
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Shirelead
Study Sites (20)
Cancer Center and Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope
Duarte, California, 91010-3000, United States
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital
Los Angeles, California, 90033-0804, United States
Cedars-Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Northwestern University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637-1470, United States
Johns Hopkins Oncology Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231-2410, United States
Cancer Center of Albany Medical Center
Albany, New York, 12208, United States
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021, United States
New York Medical College
Valhalla, New York, 10595, United States
Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104-4283, United States
Kimmel Cancer Center of Thomas Jefferson University - Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107-5541, United States
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030-4009, United States
Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9, Canada
Ottawa General Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4, Canada
Royal Victoria Hospital - Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Study Director
Takeda
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2001
First Posted
February 26, 2004
Study Start
December 11, 2000
Primary Completion
March 27, 2002
Study Completion
March 27, 2002
Last Updated
June 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06