Usual Care Vs Choice of Alternative Rx: Low Back Pain
2 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares two approaches to the management of acute low back pain: usual care (standard benefit) vs. the choice of: usual care, chiropractic, acupuncture or massage therapy (expanded benefit). 480 subjects with uncomplicated, acute low back pain will be recruited from a health maintenance organization, and randomized to either usual care (n=160) or choice of expanded benefits (n=320). Patients' preferences for individual therapies and expectations of improvement will be measured at baseline and throughout the study. Subjects randomized to the expanded benefits arm who choose chiropractic, acupuncture or massage will receive up to 10 treatments over a five-week period. Additional treatments will be available after the fifth week but will require a copayment. Treatments will be provided by licensed providers who have met strict credentialing criteria. Chiropractic, acupuncture or massage treatments will begin within 48 hours. Chiropractic, acupuncture and massage therapy scope of practice guidelines for the treatment of acute low back pain have been developed as have detailed data tracking procedures to be used at each patient visit. Symptom relief, functional status, restricted activity days, use of health care, and patient and provider satisfaction will be assessed at 2, 5,12, 26 and 52 weeks after initiation of treatment. Primary outcomes will include: 1) change in symptoms; 2) change in functional status; 3) patient satisfaction; and 4) total utilization of services associated with care for low back pain. Medical records and the HMO's cost management information system will identify use of services. It is hypothesized that patients offered their choice of expanded benefits will experience a more rapid improvement in symptoms, a faster return to baseline functional status, a decrease in utilization of conventional medical services, and will be more satisfied with their care. The study is a direct examination of the effectiveness of an insurance eligibility intervention, not a test of the efficacy of specific, non-allopathic treatment regimens. The results of this study will provide valuable information to clinicians, patients and third party payers on the relative benefits and costs of an "expanded benefits" treatment option which incorporates chiropractic, acupuncture and massage services for low back pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Sep 1999
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2001
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 5, 2001
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2003
CompletedMarch 7, 2008
March 1, 2008
February 2, 2001
March 5, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Backpain for less than 21 days
- Backpain within the last 24 hours
- No prior treatment or evaluation for this episode of backpain
- Ability to read and speak English
You may not qualify if:
- Not low backpain
- Backpain for \>21 days
- Already evaluated for this episode of backpain
- Already treated with acupuncture, chiropractic, massage therapy, or physical therapy for this episode of backpain
- Osteoporosis
- Taking systemic corticosteroids
- Pregnancy
- History of cancer (other than non-melanoma skin cancer)
- Clotting disorders or currently taking anti-coagulant medication
- Severe or disabling co-exiting problem (e.g. fibromyalgia, substance abuse, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.)
- Unable to read or speak English
- History of back or neck surgery within the last 5 years
- History of vertebral fracture or dislocation
- Neurological symptoms suggestive of Cauda Equina Syndrome
- Requires immediate referral to specialist
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Harvard Medical School Osher Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Eisenberg, MD
Harvard Medical School Osher Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2001
First Posted
February 5, 2001
Study Start
September 1, 1999
Study Completion
August 1, 2003
Last Updated
March 7, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-03