NCT00004799

Brief Summary

OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the safety and efficacy of acellular 2-component vs. acellular multicomponent vs. whole-cell pertussis vaccine vs. placebo in infants living in Sweden. II. Compare the relative protection of each vaccine against atypical or subclinical pertussis infection. III. Analyze possible laboratory correlates to vaccine protection.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 1991

Completed
8.9 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 24, 2000

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 25, 2000

Completed
Last Updated

June 24, 2005

Status Verified

January 1, 1997

First QC Date

February 24, 2000

Last Update Submit

June 23, 2005

Conditions

Keywords

bacterial infectionimmunologic disorders and infectious disorderspertussisrare disease

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Months - 3 Months
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)
PROTOCOL ENTRY CRITERIA: --Population Characteristics-- * Infants aged 2 months at planned date of first vaccination * No prior pertussis confirmed by culture * The following do not exclude: Down syndrome Prematurity Healthy babies vaccinated according to chronological age Recent pertussis exposure Seizures in parent or sibling Sudden infant death in sibling Close relative with history of anaphylaxis or allergy Close relative with history of strong reaction to vaccination --Patient Characteristics-- * Age: Under 3 months * Renal: No renal failure * Other: No prior gammaglobulin No requirement for immunosuppressives, e.g., HIV infection No manifest immunosuppression No serious chronic illness associated with failure to thrive No cardiac disease No progressive neurologic disease No uncontrolled epilepsy or infantile spasms No parental language or communication barrier

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Whooping CoughBacterial InfectionsImmune System DiseasesCommunicable DiseasesRare Diseases

Interventions

Diphtheria-Tetanus Vaccine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bordetella InfectionsGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsBacterial Infections and MycosesInfectionsRespiratory Tract InfectionsRespiratory Tract DiseasesDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bacterial VaccinesVaccinesBiological ProductsComplex MixturesDiphtheria ToxoidToxoidsTetanus ToxoidVaccines, Combined

Study Officials

  • Patrick Olin

    National Bacteriological Laboratory

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Sponsor Type
NIH

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 24, 2000

First Posted

February 25, 2000

Study Start

April 1, 1991

Last Updated

June 24, 2005

Record last verified: 1997-01