Pelvic Drains After Radical Hysterectomy in Treating Patients With Uterine, Cervical, or Vaginal Cancer
A Randomized Phase III Trial for Evaluation of Usefulness of Pelvic Drains After Radical Hysterectomy and Node Dissection (RHND)
1 other identifier
interventional
214
8 countries
18
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: The use of pelvic drains may help to prevent complications following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. It is not known whether receiving pelvic drains during surgery is more effective than receiving no pelvic drains during surgery in patients with uterine, cervical, or vaginal cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine if the use of pelvic drains following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy is effective in treating patients with uterine, cervical, or vaginal cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 1998
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 1999
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2000
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2004
CompletedJuly 11, 2012
July 1, 2012
2.4 years
November 1, 1999
July 10, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (18)
Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital
Vienna (Wien), A-1100, Austria
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Edegem, B-2650, Belgium
U.Z. Gasthuisberg
Leuven, B-3000, Belgium
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, F-94805, France
University Medical Center
Freiburg im Breisgau, D-79106, Germany
Universita di Brescia
Brescia, 25124, Italy
Instituto Scientifico H.S. Raffaele
Milano (Milan), 20132, Italy
Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori
Milano (Milan), 20133, Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Di Parma
Parma, 43100, Italy
University and I.R.C.C.S. Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia, 27100, Italy
Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi
Varese, 21100, Italy
Ospedale Civile
Voghera (PV), 27058, Italy
Antoni van Leeuwenhoekhuis
Amsterdam, 1066 CX, Netherlands
Medisch Spectrum Twente
Enschede, 7500 KA, Netherlands
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, 2300 ZA, Netherlands
Academisch Ziekenhuis Utrecht
Utrecht, 3508 GA, Netherlands
Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra (HUC)
Coimbra, 3049, Portugal
Instituto Valenciano De Oncologia
Valencia, 46009, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Franchi M, Trimbos JB, Zanaboni F, v d Velden J, Reed N, Coens C, Teodorovic I, Vergote I. Randomised trial of drains versus no drains following radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG) study in 234 patients. Eur J Cancer. 2007 May;43(8):1265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.03.011. Epub 2007 Apr 26.
PMID: 17466514RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Sergio L. Pecorelli, MD
Spedali Civili di Brescia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 1999
First Posted
July 22, 2004
Study Start
February 1, 1998
Primary Completion
July 1, 2000
Last Updated
July 11, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-07