Comparison of Clozapine vs Olanzapine in Childhood-Onset Psychotic Disorders
Childhood Onset Psychotic Disorders: Characterization and Treatment With Atypical Neuroleptics
2 other identifiers
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and side effects of the drugs clozapine and olanzapine in children and adolescents with schizophrenia and psychoses. Childhood psychosis is a serious disorder that may have devastating consequences. Effective treatments for the condition are under continual investigation. This study will examine the causes of and offer treatment for childhood psychosis. Participants in this study will undergo psychological tests, blood and urine tests, electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocardiogram (EKG), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain for the first 1 to 2 weeks of the study while taking their regular medications. Participants will then be tapered off their medications over 1 to 3 weeks and will continue to stay off medications for an additional 2 days to 3 weeks. During this time, participants will undergo psychiatric, neurological, and cardiac examinations as well as blood tests. After this period without medications, participants will be randomly assigned to receive either clozapine or olanzapine for 8 weeks. An EEG will be performed prior to treatment and after 6 weeks of study medication. Participants who respond well to the study drugs may continue to receive them through their own physician. Participants who do not respond to either clozapine or olanzapine or cannot tolerate their side effects will be treated individually with other drugs until optimum treatment is identified. Regular telephone updates and in person visits to NIH for repeat testing and MRIs will be conducted.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jun 1997
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 1997
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 1999
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 4, 1999
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 12, 2011
CompletedApril 12, 2011
March 1, 2011
11 years
November 3, 1999
March 2, 2011
March 11, 2011
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Change in the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms
Measures change in affective flattening or blunting, alogia, avolition/apathy, anhedonia/asociality, attention; minimum score = 0; maximum score = 125; lower values are considered a better outcome
8 week double-blind study period; baseline and 8 weeks
Change in the Clinical Global Impression Severity of Symptoms Scale
Measures change in the severity of symptoms; Minimum score = 1; maximum score = 7; lower score is considered a better outcome.
8 week double-blind study period; baseline and 8 weeks
Change in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-24
A 24-item scale measuring change in interpersonal behaviors, mood, psychosis, anxiety, speech, sleep, orientation and physical activity. Lowest score = 24; highest score = 168; lower score is considered a better outcome.
8 week double-blind study period; baseline and 8 weeks
Change in the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms
Measures change in hallucinations, delusions, bizarre behavior, and thought organization. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 170; lower score is considered a better outcome.
8 week double-blind study period; baseline and 8 weeks
Change in the Bunney-Hamburg Rating Scale for Psychosis
Measures change in psychosis severity; Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 7; lower score is considered a better outcome.
8 week double-blind study period; baseline and 8 weeks
Change in Bunney-Hamburg Rating Scale for Depression
Measures change in severity of depression; Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 7; lower score is considered a better outcome.
8 week double-blind study period; baseline and 8 weeks
Change in Bunney-Hamburg Rating Scale for Mania
Measures change in the severity of mania; Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 7; lower score is considered a better outcome.
8 week double-blind study period; baseline and 8 weeks
Change in the Bunney-Hamburg Rating Scale for Anxiety
Measures change in the severity of anxiety; Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 7; lower score is considered a better outcome.
8 week double-blind study period; baseline and 8 weeks
Other Outcomes (4)
Change in Weight
8 week double-blind study period; baseline and 8 weeks
Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)
8 week double-blind study period; baseline and 8 weeks
Change in Extrapyramidal Movements as Measured by the Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale (AIMS)
8 week double-blind study period; baseline and 8 weeks
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Olanzapine
ACTIVE COMPARATORClozapine
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females, age 7 to 18 years
- Onset of psychotic symptoms before 13th birthday and a DSM-IV diagnosis of either schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, MDI syndrome, or psychosis NOS (not otherwise specified).
- Current significant impairment due to the illness (current psychotic symptoms, decline of functioning academically and socially, significant discomfort due to psychotic symptoms).
- Failure of two prior trials with antipsychotic medications (either typical or atypical) used at adequate doses (greater than or equal to 100 mg/day in chlorpromazine equivalents) and for adequate duration (at least 4 weeks, unless terminated due to intolerable side effects). Failure is defined as either insufficient response with persistence of symptoms significantly impairing child's functioning, according to child's and parental reports and medical and school records, or intolerable side effects to drugs other than clozapine and olanzapine.
- Subjects may be included if their previous trial(s) of olanzapine failed to reach the dose of 20. mg/day or a duration of fewer than four weeks.
- Subjects may be included if their previous trial(s) of clozapine failed to reach the dose of 200. mg/day or a duration of fewer than six weeks.
- Comorbid psychiatric disorders in the past 12 months are permitted as long as not clinically significant.
You may not qualify if:
- Prepsychotic full-scale IQ less than 70.
- Unstable major neurological or medical conditions.
- Current pregnancy or plan to become pregnant during the first three months (the duration of the study) in woman of childbearing age; breast-feeding in woman with infants.
- DSM-IV substance abuse or dependence in the past 6 months.
- True non-responders to either olanzapine or clozapine. True non-response is defined as: a) intolerance to either of the medications preventing an adequate trial, or b) only minimal (less than 20%) benefit with the adequate trial of either of the medications. Adequate trial constitutes at least 8 weeks of the medication with the dose of 20 mg on olanzapine or 200 mg of clozapine.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Related Publications (3)
Gordon CT, Frazier JA, McKenna K, Giedd J, Zametkin A, Zahn T, Hommer D, Hong W, Kaysen D, Albus KE, et al. Childhood-onset schizophrenia: an NIMH study in progress. Schizophr Bull. 1994;20(4):697-712. doi: 10.1093/schbul/20.4.697.
PMID: 7701277BACKGROUNDNicolson R, Rapoport JL. Childhood-onset schizophrenia: rare but worth studying. Biol Psychiatry. 1999 Nov 15;46(10):1418-28. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00231-0.
PMID: 10578456BACKGROUNDShaw P, Sporn A, Gogtay N, Overman GP, Greenstein D, Gochman P, Tossell JW, Lenane M, Rapoport JL. Childhood-onset schizophrenia: A double-blind, randomized clozapine-olanzapine comparison. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Jul;63(7):721-30. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.7.721.
PMID: 16818861RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Judith L. Rapoport, M.D.
- Organization
- National Institute of Mental Health
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Judith L Rapoport, M.D.
Child Psychiatry Branch, NIMH, NIH
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 1999
First Posted
November 4, 1999
Study Start
June 1, 1997
Primary Completion
June 1, 2008
Study Completion
June 1, 2008
Last Updated
April 12, 2011
Results First Posted
April 12, 2011
Record last verified: 2011-03