A Randomized Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of a Strategy of Starting With Nelfinavir Versus Ritonavir Added to Background Antiretroviral (AR) Nucleoside Therapy in HIV-Infected Individuals With CD4+ Cell Counts Less Than or Equal to 200/mm3
2 other identifiers
interventional
1,300
2 countries
44
Brief Summary
To compare nelfinavir (NFV) with ritonavir (RTV) for delaying disease progression or death in HIV-infected patients with CD4+ cell counts less than 100 cells/mm3 \[AS PER AMENDMENT 3/11/98: less than or equal to 200 cells/mm3\]. To compare NFV with RTV for the development of adverse events and for rates of permanent discontinuation of study medication. \[AS PER AMENDMENT 10/02/97: To compare by intention-to-treat analysis for disease progression, including death, the following two regimens: NFV plus background combination antiretroviral (AR) therapy followed by indinavir (IDV) or RTV in the event of significant intolerance; and RTV plus AR therapy followed by IDV, then NFV, in the event of significant intolerance.\] \[AS PER AMENDMENT 3/11/98: SUBSTUDY CPCRA 045: To determine the relative rates of emergence of HIV-1 resistance and to compare changes in plasma HIV RNA levels and CD4+ cell counts in a sample of patients with CD4+ cell counts \<= 200/mm3 who are enrolled in protocol CPCRA 042.\] AR therapy is rapidly becoming the standard of care for the treatment of HIV infection. AR therapy provides the best opportunity for maximizing viral suppression, reducing toxicity and delaying the emergence of resistant strains. The newest class of AR agents, the HIV protease inhibitors, exhibits the most potent anti-HIV effects described to date. This study will compare 2 protease inhibitors, NFV and RTV for efficacy and safety in a population with advanced HIV disease, who are taking various background nucleoside therapies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable hiv-infections
44 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 2, 1999
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2001
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2001
CompletedOctober 29, 2021
October 1, 2021
November 2, 1999
October 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Concurrent Medication:
- Background AR nucleoside therapy is required, although background AR therapy may also be no background therapy. However, the use of protease inhibitors is not recommended as monotherapy unless there is no other alternative. Therefore, patients who are not on AR treatment may be enrolled at the discretion of the clinician.
- Allowed:
- Saquinavir.
- Patients must have:
- Documented HIV infection.
- A CD4+ cell count \<= 100/mm3 within 3 months prior to the study. \[AS PER AMENDMENT 3/11/98: CD4+ cell count \<= 200/mm3 any time prior to entry\].
- Parental consent if patient is \< 18 years old.
- Prior Medication:
- Allowed:
- Saquinavir (SQV).
You may not qualify if:
- Co-existing Condition:
- Patients with the following symptoms or conditions are excluded:
- Stage 2 or greater AIDS dementia complex.
- \[AS PER AMENDMENT 10/2/97: Any acute disease or condition that would, in the physician's judgement, contraindicate starting NFV or RTV.\]
- Known hypersensitivity to RTV or any of its ingredients (for patients assigned to RTV therapy).
- Concurrent Medication:
- Excluded:
- Concomitant use of protease inhibitors.
- Concomitant treatments that cannot be discontinued, and in the physician's judgement, should not be taken with NFV or RTV.
- AS PER AMENDMENT 10/2/97:
- For patients randomized to NFV:
- Concomitant therapy with terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, triazolam, midazolam, ergot derivatives, amiodarone, quinidine, or rifampin.
- For patients randomized to IDV:
- Concomitant therapy with terfenadine, astemizole, cisapride, triazolam, midazolam, and rifampin.
- Patients with any of the following prior symptoms are excluded:
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (44)
Community Consortium / UCSF
San Francisco, California, 94110, United States
Community Consortium of San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94110, United States
Denver Community Program for Clinical Research on AIDS
Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States
Denver CPCRA / Denver Pub Hlth / Rocky Mt Cancer Ctr Aurora
Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States
Denver CPCRA / Denver Public Hlth
Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States
Infectious Disease Physicians / Northern Virginia
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20422, United States
Timothy A Price
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20422, United States
Veterans Administration Med Ctr / Regional AIDS Program
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20422, United States
Washington Reg AIDS Prog / Dept of Infect Dis
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20422, United States
AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308, United States
AIDS Research Alliance - Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60657, United States
Louisiana Comm AIDS Rsch Prog / Tulane Univ Med
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Louisiana Community AIDS Research Program
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Baltimore TRIALS
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
Westat / NICHD
Rockville, Maryland, 20850, United States
Comprehensive AIDS Alliance of Detroit
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Wayne State Univ / Univ Hlth Ctr
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Henry Ford Hosp
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
Mercer Area Early Intervention Services
Camden, New Jersey, 08103, United States
Southern New Jersey AIDS Clinical Trials
Camden, New Jersey, 08103, United States
Southern New Jersey AIDS Cln Trials / Dept of Med
Camden, New Jersey, 08103, United States
New Jersey Community Research Initiative
Newark, New Jersey, 07103, United States
North Jersey Community Research Initiative
Newark, New Jersey, 07103, United States
Partners in Research - New Mexico
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States
Partners Research
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131, United States
Harlem AIDS Treatment Group / Harlem Hosp Ctr
New York, New York, 10037, United States
Harlem AIDS Treatment Group
New York, New York, 10037, United States
Portland Veterans Adm Med Ctr / Rsch & Education Grp
Portland, Oregon, 97210, United States
The Research and Education Group
Portland, Oregon, 97210, United States
Philadelphia FIGHT
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Saint Joseph's Hosp
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States
Richmond AIDS Consortium
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
Saint Paul's Hosp
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
QEII Health Science Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Saint Joseph's Hosp
London, Ontario, Canada
Ottawa Gen Hosp
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Toronto Gen Hosp
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Wellesley Hosp
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Hotel - Dieu de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Montreal Chest Institute
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
SMBD-Jewish Gen Hosp
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Centre De Recherche En Infectiologie
Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada
Royal Univ Hosp
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Related Publications (3)
MacArthur RD, Perez G, Walmsley S, Baxter J, Neaton J, Wentworth D. CD4 cell count is a better predictor of disease progression than HIV RNA level in persons with advanced HIV infection on highly active antiretroviral therapy. 8th Conf Retro and Opportun Infect. 2001 Feb 4-8 (abstract no 203)
BACKGROUNDPerez G, MacArthur RD, Walmsley S, Baxter JA, Mullin C, Neaton JD; Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS; Canadian Trials Network. A randomized clinical trial comparing nelfinavir and ritonavir in patients with advanced HIV disease (CPCRA 042/CTN 102). HIV Clin Trials. 2004 Jan-Feb;5(1):7-18. doi: 10.1310/N11F-NK93-MUMR-A1VV.
PMID: 15002082RESULTMacArthur RD, Perez G, Walmsley S, Baxter JD, Mullin CM, Neaton JD; Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA) 042/045; Canadian HIV Trials Network (CTN) 102 Protocol Teams. Comparison of prognostic importance of latest CD4+ cell count and HIV RNA levels in patients with advanced HIV infection on highly active antiretroviral therapy. HIV Clin Trials. 2005 May-Jun;6(3):127-35. doi: 10.1310/A9B9-RQD7-U8KA-503U.
PMID: 16192247RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Perez G
- STUDY CHAIR
MacArthur R
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 1999
First Posted
August 31, 2001
Study Completion
December 1, 2001
Last Updated
October 29, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-10