Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 1 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(1/1)
Active Trials
4(80%)
Results Posted
100%(1 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
3
60%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution3 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
3(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

1 of 1 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

4

trials recruiting

Total Trials

5

all time

Status Distribution
Active(4)
Completed(1)

Detailed Status

Recruiting3
Active, not recruiting1
Completed1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
5
Active
4
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A3 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

recruiting360%
active_not_recruiting120%
completed120%

Recent Activity

4 active trials
Showing 5 of 5
active_not_recruitingnot_applicable

Radial Versus Femoral Access For Carotid Artery Stenting

NCT05416853
recruitingnot_applicable

Brachial Versus Femoral Access for Carotid Artery Stenting

NCT06557135
recruiting

Carotid Revascularization for Radiation Induced Carotid Artery Stenosis

NCT05134246
recruiting

Revascularization for Symptomatic Non-acute Carotid Artery Occlusion

NCT06303414
completednot_applicable

Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial

NCT00004732

Clinical Trials (5)

Showing 5 of 5 trials
NCT05416853Not Applicable

Radial Versus Femoral Access For Carotid Artery Stenting

Active Not Recruiting
NCT06557135Not Applicable

Brachial Versus Femoral Access for Carotid Artery Stenting

Recruiting
NCT05134246

Carotid Revascularization for Radiation Induced Carotid Artery Stenosis

Recruiting
NCT06303414

Revascularization for Symptomatic Non-acute Carotid Artery Occlusion

Recruiting
NCT00004732Not Applicable

Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial

Completed

All 5 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
5