Video Laryngoscopy
6
3
3
1
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 30/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 6 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
33%
2 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 1 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 1 completed trials
Clinical Trials (6)
Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh Style Blades for Intubation in Obstetric Patients
Effect of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Conventional Laryngoscopy Upon Hemodynamics
A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Trial Of Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy For Intubation Of Newborn Infants
Remifentanil Versus Rocuronium for Optimizing Video Laryngoscopy-assisted Tracheal Intubation
A Prospective Observational Study of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Insertion of a Thin Endotracheal Catheter for Surfactant Administration in Newborn Infants
Non-inferiority Trial Comparing visionPRO to Glidescope Video Laryngoscopes