Condition
Uterovaginal Prolapse
Total Trials
6
Recruiting
0
Active
1
Completed
2
Success Rate
100.0%+13% vs avg
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Low Risk
Score: 27/100
Termination Rate
0.0%
0 terminated out of 6 trials
Success Rate
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
Late-Stage Pipeline
17%
1 trials in Phase 3/4
Results Transparency
50%
1 of 2 completed with results
Key Signals
1 with results100% success
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
5Total
Not Applicable (4)
P 4 (1)
Trial Status
Unknown3
Completed2
Active Not Recruiting1
Trial Success Rate
100.0%
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 2 completed trials
Clinical Trials (6)
Showing 6 of 6 trials
NCT01802281Not ApplicableCompletedPrimary
Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures - Randomized Trial
NCT05688059Not ApplicableCompleted
Absorbable Suture vs Permanent Suture in Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension
NCT06481436Not ApplicableActive Not RecruitingPrimary
Use of Artificial Intelligence by Urogynecologic Patients
NCT05477043UnknownPrimary
Ureteral Patency After Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension
NCT02877407Not ApplicableUnknownPrimary
Laparoscopic/Robotic-assisted Hysteropexy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse
NCT01347021Phase 4UnknownPrimary
Compare Sacrospinous Fixation Versus High Uterosacral Ligament Fixation for Uterus Vaginal Prolapse III/IV
Showing all 6 trials