SLAP Lesion
9
1
1
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
80% trial completion
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
High Risk
Score: 59/100
11.1%
1 terminated out of 9 trials
80.0%
-6.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
50%
2 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (9)
Reliability and Accuracy of a New Clinical Test for Biceps Lesions
PMCF Study on the Safety, Performance and Clinical Benefits Data of the ToggleLoc™ 2.9mm and JuggerLoc™ in the Shoulder
Biceps Tenodesis Alone Versus Biceps Tenodesis and Labrum Repair in Superior Labrum Anteroposterior ( SLAP) From Type II to Type IV
Safety and Performance of MICRORAPTOR™ Suture Anchors in Shoulder and Hip
Biceps Tenodesis with 360 Suture Anchor Versus Self Locking Tenodesis in the Absence of Rotator Cuff Tears
Biceps Tenodesis Alone Versus Biceps Tenodesis and Labrum Repair in Superior Labrum Anteroposterior (SLAP) Lesion Type IV
BicepsTenodesis vs. Biceps Debridement in Combined RC Tears and SLAP Lesions
S&P of Q-Fix™ All-Suture Anchor System
Effect of Battlefield Acupuncture and Physical Therapy Versus Physical Therapy Alone After Shoulder Surgery