Salpingectomy
11
1
2
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
80% trial completion
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
High Risk
Score: 62/100
9.1%
1 terminated out of 11 trials
80.0%
-6.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (11)
Does Vnotes Salpingectomy Reduce Ovarian Reserve?
SALpingectomy for STERilization (SALSTER)
vNOTES Salpingo-oophorectomy or Bilateral Salpingectomy Compared With Laparoscopic.
Preventing Ovarian Cancer Through Oportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Colorectal Surgery
Stop Ovarian Cancer Young; Effect of the Opportunistic Salpingectomy on Age of Menopause
Analysis of the Molecular Composition of Tubal Cilia in Patients With or Without Ectopic Pregnancy
vNOTES Transvaginal Endoscopic Surgery Versus Laparoscopy
Driving Factors of Decision Making for Prophylactic Salpingectomy Versus Tubal Ligation at the Time of Cesarean Section
Residual Tubal Tissue on the Ovarian Surface Following Salpingectomy With Laparoscopy and Laparotomy
Feasibility of Opportunistic Salpingectomy at the Time of Vaginal Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology
Cohort Study of Risk Reducing Salpingectomy