Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block
6
2
2
3
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 30/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 6 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
33%
2 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 3 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 3 completed trials
Clinical Trials (6)
Comparison of Pain Relief Methods for Hip Surgery: A Study on Two Different Nerve Block Techniques
Comparıson Of The Effects Of Perıcapsulary Nerve Group Block (Peng Block) And Lumbar Erector Spına Plan Block (Lesp Block) On Postoperatıve Opıoıd Consumptıon
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Fascia Iliaca Block vs Lumbar Plexus Block for Postoperative Analgesia for Total Hip Arthroplasty
Comparative Assessment of Effectiveness and Safety of L-ESPB Versus Absence of Locoregional Block in Hip Surgery
Combined Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block and Pericapsular Nerve Group Block in Patients Undergoing Hip Surgeries
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block