Gingival Recessions
11
3
5
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 11 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (11)
Management of Postoperative Pain Following Free Gingival Graft Harvesting Using Ora-Aid Versus Acrylic Palatal Stent
Histological and Clinical Evaluation of De-epithelialized Connective Tissue Grafts Obtained by Different Methods
Comparing CAF and TCAF With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Multiple Recessions in the Premandibula.
Comparing CAF and TCAF With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Multiple Recessions in the Maxilla.
Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of De-Epithelialized Free Gingival Graft in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions
Vestibular Incision Subperiosteal Tunnel Access (VISTA) Technique Versus Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) Combined With a Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Maxillary Gingival Recessions
Optimizing Clinical Outcomes in CAF + SCTG: the Impact of Compressive Sutures
Guided Versus Non-Guided Harvesting Technique of Soft Tissue Graft in Cairo Recession Type I Sites
m-VISTA Technique vs. CAF in the Treatment of Class III Multiple Recessions
Predetermination for Gingival Recession
Platelet-Rich Fibrin in the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions