Gingival Recession, Plastic Surgery
7
4
4
2
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 7 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 2 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 2 completed trials
Clinical Trials (7)
Comparing CAF and TCAF With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Multiple Recessions in the Premandibula.
Comparing CAF and TCAF With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Multiple Recessions in the Maxilla.
Comparing TCAF and MTUN With Soft Tissue Grafting for Treating Single Recessions in the Premandible
Non-Inferiority of Fibroguide Collagen Membrane Compared to Autologous Connective Tissue Graft for Coverage of Multiple Adjacent Recession. Multicenter Trial.
Clinical Evaluation of (TCAF) Versus (CAF) Combined With Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Multiple RT2 Gingival Recession Sites
Gingival Recessions Treated by CAF with or Without PRF
Local Application of Hyaluronic Acid (HYADENT BG) With Free Soft Tissue Grafing Improves Treatment Outcomes.