This study aims to test the effect of artificial tears, vitamin A ointment and steroid drops in artificial eye wearers with chronic complaints of irritation and/or excess discharge.
Registry Overview
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
Recruitment status
unknown
Reported enrollment (type unavailable)
Not reported
Study completion date
Not reported
Date not reported
Listed locations
1 countries · 1 sites
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Related Scientific Literature
Loading related publications...
Study Timeline
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
Change of discomfort score and discharge score and discharge score from baseline till 2-week use of either: Artificial eyedrops, topical vitamin A ointment or low-dose topical steroids
Secondary Outcomes (1)
We also attempt to characterize the patients who will benefit from either artificial eyedrops, topical vitamin A ointemnt of low-dose steroids
Interventions
RETINOL PALMITATEType not reported
Hylan 0,15/0,15 mg/ml, oogdruppels, oplossingType not reported
FML Liquifilm 0,1%, oogdruppels, suspensieType not reported
Registry intervention entries
These entries preserve how the registry describes the intervention. Their treatment roles are shown separately from molecular identities.
Formulated product
FML Liquifilm 0,1%, oogdruppels, suspensie
The registry describes a specific formulation. Its exact chemical ingredients and approval status require separate evidence.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Subjects < 16 years old - Subjects expected to be incapable to understand the study or fill-out the questionnaires. - Patients with treatable acquired medical issues of the socket (ie new conjunctival cyst, exposed implant). If the patients still have mucopurulent discharge and discomfort after removal/treatment of the irritative factor, they can be included. - Patients with transient complaints from suspected (sub) acute infections for which antibiotics are prescribed. If the patients still have mucopurulent discharge and discomfort after treatment, they can be included. - Patients with scratched, or irregular prostheses, or with latest polishing more than one year ago, should first have their prosthesis polished or renewed. If the patients still have mucopurulent discharge and discomfort after these improvements than they can be included. - The model of the prosthesis should first be adapted if a wrong fit is suspected (ie large empty space, pressure points). If the patients still have mucopurulent discharge and discomfort after these improvements than they can be included.