Parasacral TENS Project
Parasacral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation vs. Standard Second-Line Therapy for Overactive Bladder in Pediatric Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the project is to compare the efficacy of parasacral transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) versus standard second-line therapy (oral anticholinergics) for pediatric patients with overactive bladder (OAB) and lower urinary tract dysfunction who have previously failed standard urotherapy. The investigators aim to evaluate the changes in lower urinary tract symptoms, quality of life scores, adherence to treatment, and parental/patient satisfaction with both treatment models. Pediatric patients aged 6 years and older who are seen in the clinic for overactive bladder and have failed to improve their lower urinary tract symptoms with standard urotherapy alone will be randomized to receive either parasacral TENS or oxybutynin, an oral anticholinergic medication routinely used in pediatric patients for this condition. Patients randomized to parasacral TENS will receive a treatment plan that includes initial instructions on how to apply and use the TENS unit. The patients will perform 30-minute sessions, twice a week, for 12 weeks. A TENS unit will be loaned to the family for the duration of the treatment. This therapy will be administered at home by their guardians. Bladder diaries, the Vancouver Scoring System for Dysfunctional Elimination, and Likert scales for parental and patient preference and adherence to treatment will be administered prior to starting the study, at week 4, week 8, and upon completion of treatment to analyze the efficacy of TENS in treating pediatric overactive bladder compared to oxybutynin.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 23, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 29, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 28, 2029
October 23, 2026
October 1, 2026
2 years
September 1, 2026
October 22, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy of TENS
The primary endpoint is the change from baseline to 12 weeks in the Vancouver Nonneurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction/Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome (NLUTD/DES) Symptom Score (VSS), a validated composite score ranging from 0-54.
baseline to completion of treatment (week 12)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Voiding Diary
baseline to completion of treatment (week 12)
Comparison of Uroflowmetry changes from baseline to completion of treatment (week 12)
baseline to completion of treatment (week 12)
Patient Questionnaires
baseline to completion of treatment (week 12)
Study Arms (2)
TENS
EXPERIMENTALParasacral transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS)
Standard second-line therapy (oral anticholinergics)
ACTIVE COMPARATOROxybutynin
Interventions
Electrical stimulation can be delivered in multiple ways: transcutaneously (using EMG patches or needle electrodes) or via the implantation of a stimulator. Stimulation is applied at the parasacral plexus or via the posterior tibial nerve to the sacral plexus. In children, transcutaneous EMG patches that deliver a current to the parasacral space have been used to treat bladder overactivity and are preferable due to the associated ability to provide care at home and with less discomfort than needle electrode insertion.
Standard second-line therapy (oral anticholinergics)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient in UVA Pediatric Urology seen for LUTD
- Ages: 4-18
- Male or female
- Toilet trained for \> 6 months
- LUTS have not resolved with first-line urotherapy
You may not qualify if:
- Recurrent UTIs
- Conditions that may affect the ability to respond to treatment for LUTD with standard therapies: Neurogenic bladder, PUV, spinal dysraphism, anatomic abnormalities (VACTERYL, Cloacal Anomalies), dilating VUR, and high-grade hydronephrosis
- Previous use of anticholinergic medications for LUTD
- Current use of anticholinergic medications, alpha blockers, or phenazopyridine hydrochloride
- Non-English speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (15)
Ebert KM, Terry H, Ching CB, Dajusta DG, Fuchs ME, Jayanthi VR, McLeod DJ, Alpert SA. Effectiveness of a Practical, At-Home Regimen of Parasacral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Pediatric Overactive Bladder. Urology. 2022 Jul;165:294-298. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.017. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
PMID: 35065988BACKGROUNDGomaa MD, AbdAllah HA, Ismail IY, Wasfy IS, Sherief MH. Outcomes of para-sacral transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation in treatment of primary and refractory overactive bladder among children. Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Aug;56(8):2475-2482. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04006-8. Epub 2024 May 13.
PMID: 38739240BACKGROUNDMaternik M, Lakomy-Gawryszewska A, Jozefowicz K, Chudzik I, Golebiewski A, Zurowska A. Immediate and continued results of parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in paediatric patients with overactive bladders. J Pediatr Urol. 2024 Oct;20(5):868-876. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.07.006. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
PMID: 39069460BACKGROUNDFernandez N, Chua ME, Ming JM, Silangcruz JM, Zu'bi F, Dos Santos J, Lorenzo AJ, Braga LH, Lopes RI. Neurostimulation Therapy for Non-neurogenic Overactive Bladder in Children: A Meta-analysis. Urology. 2017 Dec;110:201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
PMID: 28823638BACKGROUNDLordelo P, Teles A, Veiga ML, Correia LC, Barroso U Jr. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in children with overactive bladder: a randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):683-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.053. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
PMID: 20561643BACKGROUNDBarroso U Jr, Lordelo P, Lopes AA, Andrade J, Macedo A Jr, Ortiz V. Nonpharmacological treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction using biofeedback and transcutaneous electrical stimulation: a pilot study. BJU Int. 2006 Jul;98(1):166-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06264.x.
PMID: 16831163BACKGROUNDO'Sullivan H, Kelly G, Toale J, Cascio S. Comparing the outcomes of parasacral transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Feb;40(2):570-581. doi: 10.1002/nau.24601. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
PMID: 33410536BACKGROUNDWijekoon N, Deshpande A. Treatment modalities for paediatric functional daytime lower urinary tract disorders: an updated review. Ther Adv Urol. 2024 Apr 4;16:17562872241241848. doi: 10.1177/17562872241241848. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
PMID: 38584856BACKGROUNDde Abreu GE, de Souza LA, da Fonseca MLV, Barbosa TBC, de Mello ERD, Nunes ANB, Barroso UO Jr. Parasacral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Children and Adolescents with Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Urol. 2021 Jun;205(6):1785-1791. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001579. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
PMID: 33525925BACKGROUNDBarroso U Jr, Tourinho R, Lordelo P, Hoebeke P, Chase J. Electrical stimulation for lower urinary tract dysfunction in children: a systematic review of the literature. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011 Nov;30(8):1429-36. doi: 10.1002/nau.21140. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
PMID: 21717502BACKGROUNDChang SJ, Van Laecke E, Bauer SB, von Gontard A, Bagli D, Bower WF, Renson C, Kawauchi A, Yang SS. Treatment of daytime urinary incontinence: A standardization document from the International Children's Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Jan;36(1):43-50. doi: 10.1002/nau.22911. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
PMID: 26473630BACKGROUND4. OxyBUTYnin. Lexi-Drugs. UpToDate Lexidrug.UpToDate Inc. https://online.lexi.com. Accessed September 25, 2025.
BACKGROUNDChancellor MB, Lucioni A, Staskin D. Oxybutynin-associated Cognitive Impairment: Evidence and Implications for Overactive Bladder Treatment. Urology. 2024 Apr;186:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.11.033. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
PMID: 38296001BACKGROUNDSchafer SK, Niemczyk J, von Gontard A, Pospeschill M, Becker N, Equit M. Standard urotherapy as first-line intervention for daytime incontinence: a meta-analysis. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;27(8):949-964. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-1051-6. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
PMID: 28948380BACKGROUNDNieuwhof-Leppink AJ, Hussong J, Chase J, Larsson J, Renson C, Hoebeke P, Yang S, von Gontard A. Definitions, indications and practice of urotherapy in children and adolescents: - A standardization document of the International Children's Continence Society (ICCS). J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Apr;17(2):172-181. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
PMID: 33478902BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2026
First Posted
October 23, 2026
Study Start
September 30, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 29, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 28, 2029
Last Updated
October 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
This study protocol is not a multi-site study.