NCT07892040

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of cervical sensorimotor training and oculomotor training in patients with Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS). It will evaluate their effects on neck pain, cervical proprioception, neck disability, and visual performance. Both interventions aim to improve cervical neuromuscular control and visual function through targeted exercises. The findings will help identify the more effective rehabilitation approach for managing musculoskeletal and visual symptoms associated with CVS.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
2mo left

Started Oct 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress6%
Oct 2026Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 17, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 20, 2026

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 23, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

October 23, 2026

Status Verified

October 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

October 17, 2026

Last Update Submit

October 17, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Visual FatigueCervical Sensorimotor trainingJoint Position ErrorNeck DisabilitySensorimotor IntegrationOculomotor Training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Numeric Rating Scale (NPRS) is most frequently used instruments to measure pain intensity .The 11-point numeric with 0 representing No pain, 1-3 representing Mild Pain (nagging, annoying, interfering little with ADLs), 4-6 representing Moderate Pains (interferes significantly with ADLs), 7-10 representing Sever Pain (disabling, unable to perform ADLs).

    Baseline and after 6 weeks post treatment

  • Neck Disability Index

    The NDI is a self-reported questionnaire that checks how much neck pain impacts daily life. It covers 10 areas (like pain, self-care, work, and recreation), each scored from 0 to 5. A higher total (out of 50) means more disability: * 0-4: No disability * 5-14: Mild * 15-24: Moderate * 25-34: Severe Above 34: Complete disability The NDI is a reliable way to assess neck-related issues.

    Baseline and after 6 weeks post treatment

  • Cervical Joint Position Error Test (JPE)

    This test measures neck proprioception (body awareness). A laser pointer on the head tracks how close someone can return to their starting position after moving their head with eyes closed. The closer they get, the better their proprioception. A difference over 4.5° suggests impaired awareness. The JPE test is dependable for checking neck movement sense

    Baseline and after 6 weeks post treatment

  • Visual Complaint Index (VCI)

    The VCI is a questionnaire that asks about vision problems like eye strain, blurred or double vision, headaches, sensitivity to light, and fatigue-especially from screen use or neck problems. Each symptom is rated for how bad and how often it is. Multiply those scores for each symptom and add them up for a total. Higher totals mean more symptoms. The VCI helps spot issues linked to Computer Vision Syndrome and neck-related visual problems

    Baseline and after 6 weeks post treatment

Study Arms (2)

Cervical Sensorimotor Training

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will perform Neutral Return, Target Angles, and Movement Sequence exercises using laser-guided head movements, starting with 5 repetitions per movement and progressing according to tolerance. Sessions will last 30-40 minutes, 3 times per week for 8 weeks.

Other: Cervical Sensorimotor Training

Oculomotor Training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group B will receive saccadic eye movements, smooth pursuit, and gaze stabilization exercises (X1 and X2), starting at 3 minutes per exercise with weekly progression. Sessions will last 30-40 minutes, 3 times per week for 8 weeks

Other: Occulomotor Training

Interventions

Participants will perform Neutral Return, Target Angles, and Movement Sequence exercises using laser-guided head movements, starting with 5 repetitions per movement and progressing according to tolerance. Sessions will last 30-40 minutes, 3 times per week for 6 weeks.

Cervical Sensorimotor Training

Group B will receive saccadic eye movements, smooth pursuit, and gaze stabilization exercises (X1 and X2), starting at 3 minutes per exercise with weekly progression. Sessions will last 30-40 minutes, 3 times per week for 6 weeks

Oculomotor Training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18-40 years.
  • Both genders.
  • Individuals using digital screens for more than 4 hours/day.
  • NPRS range between 4-6.
  • Presence of neck pain for at least 3 months
  • CVS-Q smart score 7-10.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of cervical trauma or surgery.
  • Vestibular disorders.
  • Neurological disorders.
  • Cervical radiculopathy/myelopathy.
  • Diagnosed migraine disorders.
  • visual impairment corrected by lenses/glasses
  • Inflammatory cervical conditions.
  • Recent physiotherapy treatment within last 3 months.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Medical Center

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Asthenopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Eye Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of cervical sensorimotor training and oculomotor training in patients with Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS). It will evaluate their effects on neck pain, cervical proprioception, neck disability, and visual performance. Both interventions aim to improve cervical neuromuscular control and visual function through targeted exercises. The findings will help identify the more effective rehabilitation approach for managing musculoskeletal and visual symptoms associated with CVS.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2026

First Posted

October 23, 2026

Study Start

October 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

October 23, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share
Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
6 months after the publication of manuscript
Access Criteria
data can be requested from corresponding author

Locations