Study of Cross-Cutting E-Health Prevention Approaches
CCePP
A Pilot Study of Cross-Cutting E-Health Prevention Approaches to Address Campus Sexual Assault and Alcohol Misuse.
2 other identifiers
interventional
350
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The National Institute of Health Academic Research Enhancement Award research study fills a major gap in sexual violence and alcohol misuse prevention on college campuses by implementing and testing the feasibility of a multi-level social ecological model approach consisting of six established e-health primary prevention strategies in a feasibility study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 5, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 21, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 22, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2028
October 22, 2026
May 1, 2026
7 months
May 5, 2026
October 15, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Victimization
Sexual assault victimization was assessed with Revised Sexual Experience Survey. Participants were asked how often they experienced 7 unwanted sexual experiences. Also, the tactic that was used (for example, "using force") was also noted. Response options ranged from 0 (never) to 3 (3 or more times). An overall score for the Revised Sexual Experience Survey, was calculated by Summing each Outcome and Tactic Score with a range from 0 to 135 with higher scores indicating more sexual violence victimization, a worse score than the lower scores. The second method combines several of the outcomes, but keeps tactics separate, resulting in a potential range of 0 to 63 with the higher score being a worse score than the lower score.
Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Perpetration
The Sexual Experiences Survey-Short Form Perpetration is a 7-item, behaviorally specific self-report instrument designed to assess the perpetration of unwanted sexual behaviors. It covers sexual coercion, unwanted contact, attempted rape, and rape, typically asking about acts committed since age 14 or in the past year. The higher score indicates more unwanted sexual experiences and therefore is a worse score than a lower score.
Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Concise
The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test is a 10-item screening tool developed by the World Health Organization to assess alcohol consumption, drinking behaviors, and alcohol-related problems. The higher the score indicates more alcohol related problems, therefore a worse score.
Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Drinking Behavior Questionnaire
A ten-item self report measure looking at an individual's drinking habits. The higher the score indicates more problematic drinking habits, therefore a worse score.
Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Bystander Attitudes Scale Revised
Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Barriers to Sexual Assault Bystander Intervention Scale
Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Social Self-identification Scale
8 weeks, 16 weeks
Bystander Efficacy Scale
Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
Updated Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale,
Baseline, 8 weeks, 16 weeks
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Individual Programming Intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the intervention arm will participate in the RealConsent serial webinar program, the +Change Social Norms Program, and the ShipHappens Bystander Video Game.
Cross Cutting e-health Prevention Program Control Arm
NO INTERVENTIONTrue control group.
Interventions
Three sexual violence and alcohol misuse ehealth prevention programs for college students.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- full-time University of New Hampshire student
- first-year University of New Hampshire student
- live in the University of New Hampshire residence halls
- not married
You may not qualify if:
- not a University of New Hampshire first-year student
- does not live in the University of New Hampshire residence halls
- married
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of New Hampshirelead
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)collaborator
- Georgia State Universitycollaborator
- Rhode Island Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of New Hampshire
Durham, New Hampshire, 03824, United States
Related Publications (20)
Potter SJ, Moynihan MM, Stapleton JG. Using social self-identification in social marketing materials aimed at reducing violence against women on campus. J Interpers Violence. 2011 Mar;26(5):971-90. doi: 10.1177/0886260510365870. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
PMID: 20522887BACKGROUNDSalazar LF, Vivolo-Kantor A, Hardin J, Berkowitz A. A web-based sexual violence bystander intervention for male college students: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Sep 5;16(9):e203. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3426.
PMID: 25198417BACKGROUNDSalazar LF, Vivolo-Kantor A, McGroarty-Koon K. Formative Research With College Men to Inform Content and Messages for a Web-Based Sexual Violence Prevention Program. Health Commun. 2017 Sep;32(9):1133-1141. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1214219. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
PMID: 27593559BACKGROUNDSchipani-McLaughlin AM, Gilmore AK, Salazar LF, Potter SJ, Stapleton JG, Orchowski LM. Advancing a Comprehensive Multilevel Approach to Sexual Violence Prevention Using Existing Efficacious Programs. J Forensic Nurs. 2024 Jan-Mar 01;20(1):20-29. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0000000000000457. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
PMID: 38015061BACKGROUNDBasile KC, DeGue S, Jones K, et al. STOP SV: A Technical Package to Prevent Sexual Violence. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevension. Published online 2016.
BACKGROUNDPotter S, Howard R, Murphy S, Moynihan MM. Long-term impacts of college sexual assaults on women survivors' educational and career attainments. J Am Coll Health. 2018 Aug-Sep;66(6):496-507. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2018.1440574. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
PMID: 29447618BACKGROUNDdoi:10.1177/1521025115584750
BACKGROUNDdoi:10.1037/a0033470
BACKGROUNDCrosby RA, Salazar LF. Essentials of Public Health Research Methods. 1st ed. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2021. Accessed October 11, 2023. https://www.jblearning.com/catalog
BACKGROUNDMoynihan MM, Banyard VL, Cares AC, Potter SJ, Williams LM, Stapleton JG. Encouraging responses in sexual and relationship violence prevention: what program effects remain 1 year later? J Interpers Violence. 2015 Jan;30(1):110-32. doi: 10.1177/0886260514532719. Epub 2014 May 20.
PMID: 24850763BACKGROUNDPotter SJ, Stapleton JG. Bringing in the target audience in bystander social marketing materials for communities: suggestions for practitioners. Violence Against Women. 2011 Jun;17(6):797-812. doi: 10.1177/1077801211410364.
PMID: 21727157BACKGROUNDPotter SJ, Flanagan M, Seidman M, Hodges H, Stapleton JG. Developing and Piloting Videogames to Increase College and University Students' Awareness and Efficacy of the Bystander Role in Incidents of Sexual Violence. Games Health J. 2019 Feb;8(1):24-34. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2017.0172. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
PMID: 30183345BACKGROUNDGilmore AK, Lewis MA, George WH. A randomized controlled trial targeting alcohol use and sexual assault risk among college women at high risk for victimization. Behav Res Ther. 2015 Nov;74:38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
PMID: 26408290BACKGROUNDGilmore AK, Leone RM, Oesterle DW, Davis KC, Orchowski LM, Ramakrishnan V, Kaysen D. Web-Based Alcohol and Sexual Assault Prevention Program With Tailored Content Based on Gender and Sexual Orientation: Preliminary Outcomes and Usability Study of Positive Change (+Change). JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 22;6(7):e23823. doi: 10.2196/23823.
PMID: 35867393BACKGROUNDSalazar LF, Schipani-McLaughlin AM, Sebeh Y, Nizam Z, Hayat M. A Web-Based Sexual Violence, Alcohol Misuse, and Bystander Intervention Program for College Women (RealConsent): Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 21;25:e43740. doi: 10.2196/43740.
PMID: 37342080BACKGROUNDSchipani-McLaughlin AM, Salazar LF, Muilenburg JL, Lauckner C, Swartzendruber A, Walters D. A Mixed Media Campaign to Promote Bystander Intervention and Reduce Alcohol Use Among College Students: A Pilot Study. Health Promot Pract. 2022 Nov;23(6):973-983. doi: 10.1177/15248399211027542. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
PMID: 34338037BACKGROUNDPotter SJ, Moschella EA, Smith D, Draper N. Exploring the Usage of a Violence Prevention and Response App Among Community College Students. Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(1_suppl):44S-53S. doi: 10.1177/1090198120910995.
PMID: 32452252BACKGROUND10.1080/15228835.2021.1929665
BACKGROUNDSalazar LF, Vivolo-Kantor A, Schipani-McLaughlin AM. Theoretical Mediators of RealConsent: A Web-Based Sexual Violence Prevention and Bystander Education Program. Health Educ Behav. 2019 Feb;46(1):79-88. doi: 10.1177/1090198118779126. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
PMID: 29996689BACKGROUNDPotter SJ. Using a multimedia social marketing campaign to increase active bystanders on the college campus. J Am Coll Health. 2012;60(4):282-95. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2011.599350.
PMID: 22559087BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 5, 2026
First Posted
October 22, 2026
Study Start
September 21, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Last Updated
October 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- The scientific data will be made available to other users no later than time of an associated publication or end of the performance period, whichever comes first and for how long data will be available.
- Access Criteria
- Upon completion of the proposed study, we will work with the program officer to access how to share the data and will follow their direction.
The research team will retain and share aggregated quantitative and qualitative data (after all identifying information is redacted), if users commit to the following: (1) using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) securing the data using appropriate computer technology (for example, using a secure firewall-protected server to store datasets and transcriptions); and (3) destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed. If the researcher agrees to these stipulations, the PI will send him/her the data set prepared using Statistical Package for Social Sciences 29 and/or the de-identified transcriptions from focus groups. Research participants will be identified by number. All data, including focus group transcriptions, will not include identifying information from any participant. Any information that could potentially identify a participant will be removed from the data set.