NCT07868744

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if UV light treatment (photo functionalization) works to help dental implants heal faster and become stable enough for early use in adults missing teeth in the lower back jaw. It will also learn about the survival rate and safety of these implants. The main questions it aims to answer are: Do the UV-treated implants achieve the required stability score (IST ≥ 65) at 4 to 6 weeks to allow for early placement of the artificial tooth? What are the implant survival rates, and how do the gums and surrounding bone respond 6 months after the artificial tooth is placed? Researchers will test the stability of these UV-treated implants against a standard clinical threshold to see if they safely support an early treatment timeline. Participants will :Have a UV-treated titanium dental implant surgically placed in their lower jaw. Visit the clinic for check ups and non-invasive stability tests at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks after surgery. Receive their final artificial tooth between 4 to 6 weeks, provided the implant is completely stable. Return for follow-up X-rays and tissue checks at 1, 3, and 6 months after receiving the artificial tooth.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Apr 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress53%
Apr 2026Mar 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 4, 2026

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 9, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 30, 2027

Expected
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 30, 2027

Last Updated

October 9, 2026

Status Verified

October 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

October 4, 2026

Last Update Submit

October 4, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

UV Photofunctionalization (phF)Ultraviolet (UV) surface treatmentEarly loadingTitanium agingSuperhydrophilic implantUltraviolet (UV)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary implant stability

    mplant Stability Test (IST): Stability is quantified via IST values using the AnyCheck® device, which employs a non-invasive magnetic percussion method. Insertion Torque: Mechanical stability at placement is measured in Newton centimeters (N·cm/Nm) using a calibrated torque wrench.

    IST values are recorded immediately after the surgical placement (Day 1 / Day 0), and during follow-up visits at Week 2, Week 4, and Week 6.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Assessing the overall survival and success of the implants at 6 months after functional loading.

    The final survival rate is assessed 6 months after the implant has been loaded with the final prosthesis. Any implant showing signs of failure before loading is excluded from the final analysis.

  • Peri-implant Soft-Tissue Response

    The primary evaluation is recorded 6 months after the final prosthesis is delivered. According to the participant timeline, periodontal probing is specifically conducted at Week 8 to 10, Week 20 to 22, and Week 32 to 34.

  • Marginal Bone Level Change

    X-rays are taken at 1, 3, and 6 months after the placement of the final prosthesis.

Study Arms (1)

UV-Photofunctionalized Titanium Implants

EXPERIMENTAL

The study is defined as a "single-arm, clinical study". Because there is only one group in the trial, all participants are enrolled into this single arm and receive the intervention being tested (the UV-photofunctionalized dental implants). Therefore, this arm serves as the experimental group. There are no comparator, placebo, or sham arms in this study.

Device: UV-photofunctionalized titanium dental implants

Interventions

Unlike standard titanium implants that are placed directly from the packaging, the implants in this study (Point UV® Implant System, Titanium Grade 4) undergo Ultraviolet Photofunctionalization (UV phF) immediately prior to surgical insertion to activate the implant surface. The surgical placement is strictly limited to healed edentulous ridges located specifically in the mandibular posterior area (lower jaw).The intervention is exclusively performed on patients categorized as having D2 or D3 bone quality, verified by pre-operative CBCT scans. The intervention employs an early loading prosthetic protocol, distinguishing it from conventional/delayed loading approaches.

Also known as: Point UV Implant, UV-phF titanium implants
UV-Photofunctionalized Titanium Implants

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults ≥18 years of age.
  • Patients with single or multiple missing teeth in a healed edentulous ridge located in the mandibular posterior area.
  • Patients classified as having D2 or D3 bone quality based on pre-operative CBCT scans.
  • Patients possessing sufficient bone volume for implant placement without the need for major grafting procedures.
  • Patients demonstrating good oral hygiene and compliance.

You may not qualify if:

  • Uncontrolled systemic diseases.
  • Bone quality of D1 or D4.
  • Smoking \>10 cigarettes/day.
  • Active infection or periodontal disease.
  • Need for extensive bone augmentation.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Parafunctional habits.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Future university hospital

Cairo, Fifth Settlement, 11835, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Al-Hity TR, El-Dhuwaib B, Al-Zahawi AR, Gul SS. Comparison of primary and secondary stability of a one-piece compressive conometric implant system in the posterior upper and lower jaws. Front Oral Health. 2025 Jul 25;6:1625593. doi: 10.3389/froh.2025.1625593. eCollection 2025.

  • Sandhu S, et al.; Impact of UV-Photofunctionalization on Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants: A 3-year Clinical Follow-up; Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022; 33(S24); 118.

    RESULT
  • Sanchez-Perez A, Cachazo-Jimenez C, Sanchez-Matas C, Martin-de-Llano JJ, Davis S, Carda-Batalla C. Effects of Ultraviolet Photoactivation on Osseointegration of Commercial Pure Titanium Dental Implant After 8 Weeks in a Rabbit Model. J Oral Implantol. 2020 Apr 1;46(2):101-107. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00122.

  • Liu Y, et al.; Role of Photofunctionalization in Orthopedic and Dental Customized Implants: A Review of Bio-Integration; Bio-Integration; 2025; 6(1); 0094.

    RESULT
  • Funato A, Ogawa T; Photofunctionalized implants: A clinical breakthrough in healing time and success rate; Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(4); 1263-1272.

    RESULT
  • Al-Obaidi MH, et al.; Evaluating dental implant stability using three devices Osstell, Periotest, and AnyCheck: a clinical study; J Baghdad Coll Dent; 2024; 36(3); 14-22.

    RESULT
  • Chacko A, Varghese S, et al.; Enhancing osseointegration: A comprehensive review of UV photofunctionalization for titanium dental implants; IP Ann Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2025; 11(2); 107-114.

    RESULT
  • Yamuna R, Keerthivasan MS, Narasimman M, Tamizhesai B, Venkatakrishnan CJ; Photofunctionalization of dental implants - A literature review; Indian J Dent Sci; 2025; 17; 95-103.

    RESULT
  • Razali M, Ngeow WC, Omar RA, Chai WL; An Integrated Overview of Ultraviolet Technology for Reversing Titanium Dental Implant Degradation: Mechanism of Reaction and Effectivity; Appl Sci; 2020; 10(1654); 1-23.

    RESULT
  • Lang X, Qiao B, Ge Z, Yan J, Zhang Y. Clinical Effects of Photofunctionalization on Implant Stability and Marginal Bone Loss: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 28;11(23):7042. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237042.

  • Ghambaryan N, Jilavyan A, Burnazyan S, Khudaverdyan M, Gegham T, Hakobyan G. Clinical Outcome of Immediate Loading UV-Photofunctionalized Implants in Patients with Completely Edentulous Mandible, Placed with Guided Surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023 Mar;22(Suppl 1):64-75. doi: 10.1007/s12663-022-01798-z. Epub 2022 Dec 15.

  • Arroyo-Lamas N, Arteagoitia I, Ugalde U. Surface Activation of Titanium Dental Implants by Using UVC-LED Irradiation. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 5;22(5):2597. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052597.

  • Houshmand B, Rezaei Esfahroodi Z, Behnamghader A, Mohammadreza S, Azizi A, Ramezani K. Evaluation of UV photofunctionalization effect on ultrastructural properties of SLA titanium disks: An in vitro study. J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2023 Sep 11;15(2):117-122. doi: 10.34172/japid.2023.015. eCollection 2023.

Related Links

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the implant stability and the feasibility of early loading for UV-photofunctionalized (UV-phF) titanium implants at 4 to 6 weeks post-placement in the D2/D3 bone of the posterior mandible.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dentist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2026

First Posted

October 9, 2026

Study Start

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2027

Last Updated

October 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-10

Locations