NCT07868315

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the postoperative pain and long-term clinical and radiographic success of single-visit primary root canal treatment in asymptomatic teeth with periapical lesions.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
13mo left

Started Apr 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress58%
Apr 2025Nov 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 22, 2025

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 24, 2026

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 9, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 10, 2026

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 10, 2027

Last Updated

October 9, 2026

Status Verified

October 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.6 years

First QC Date

September 24, 2026

Last Update Submit

October 8, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

treatment outcomeperiapical healthpost operative painperiapical indexChronic apical periodontitis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Postoperative Pain

    Postoperative pain following single-session primary root canal treatment, assessed using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.

    6 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 1 week, 1 month after root canal treatment.

  • Clinical Success and Radiographic Radiographic Changes in Periapical Lesion Size Following Root Canal Treatment

    Radiographic assessment of periapical lesion size following single-session primary root canal treatment. Periapical lesion size will be measured on digital periapical radiographs using image analysis software. A coin of known diameter will be used as a radiographic calibration reference to standardize measurements. The maximum diameter of the periapical radiolucency will be measured in millimeters (mm) at each follow-up examination (1, 3, 6, and 12 months). Changes in lesion size will be calculated by comparing measurements obtained at baseline and subsequent follow-up examinations.

    1 months / 3 months /6 months / 12 months

Study Arms (4)

One Fill

EXPERIMENTAL

Root canal obturation using One Fill root canal sealer according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Other: One-Fill

TotalFill

EXPERIMENTAL

Root canal obturation using TotalFill root canal sealer according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Other: TotalFill

AH Plus + Single Cone

EXPERIMENTAL

Root canal obturation using AH Plus root canal sealer in combination with a single-cone obturation technique.

Other: AH Plus + Single Cone

AH Plus + Continuous Wave

EXPERIMENTAL

Root canal obturation using AH Plus root canal sealer in combination with a continuous-wave obturation technique.

Other: AH Plus + Continuous Wave

Interventions

Root canal obturation using One-Fill bioceramic sealer with a single-cone technique. The prepared root canal is filled with a fitted gutta-percha cone coated with One-Fill sealer according to the manufacturer's instructions.

One Fill

Root canal obturation using TotalFill BC Sealer with a single-cone technique. The prepared root canal is filled with a fitted gutta-percha cone coated with TotalFill BC Sealer according to the manufacturer's instructions.

TotalFill

Root canal obturation using AH Plus epoxy resin-based sealer with a single-cone technique. A fitted gutta-percha cone is coated with AH Plus sealer and placed to the working length according to the study protocol.

AH Plus + Single Cone

Root canal obturation using AH Plus epoxy resin-based sealer with the continuous wave of condensation technique. The master gutta-percha cone is fitted to the working length, followed by down-pack and backfill procedures using heated gutta-percha according to the study protocol.

AH Plus + Continuous Wave

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 18-65 years.
  • Patients classified as ASA Physical Status I or II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification:
  • Teeth that have not previously undergone root canal retreatment or surgical intervention.
  • Patients who are able to read and sign the informed consent form.
  • Patients who are physically and mentally able to tolerate the planned dental treatment.
  • Teeth treated in a single treatment session.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Patients with chronic periodontal disease and/or a periodontal probing depth \>4 mm.
  • Symptomatic patients.
  • Patients who are unable to comply with the scheduled follow-up periods.
  • Patients who have used analgesics within 1 week or antibiotics within 1 month prior to treatment.
  • Teeth with root resorption.
  • Teeth with a vertical root fracture or a risk of vertical root fracture.
  • Teeth with incomplete root development.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Dentistry

Istanbul, Esenler, Turkey (Türkiye)

RECRUITING

Related Publications (12)

  • Orstavik D, Kerekes K, Eriksen HM. The periapical index: a scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1986 Feb;2(1):20-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00119.x. No abstract available.

  • Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions. 1967. J Endod. 2006 Apr;32(4):281-90. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.02.007. No abstract available.

  • Wu MK, Bud MG, Wesselink PR. The quality of single cone and laterally compacted gutta-percha fillings in small and curved root canals as evidenced by bidirectional radiographs and fluid transport measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Dec;108(6):946-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.07.046. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

  • Raman V, Camilleri J. Characterization and Assessment of Physical Properties of 3 Single Syringe Hydraulic Cement-based Sealers. J Endod. 2024 Mar;50(3):381-388. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Jan 14.

  • Candeiro GT, Correia FC, Duarte MA, Ribeiro-Siqueira DC, Gavini G. Evaluation of radiopacity, pH, release of calcium ions, and flow of a bioceramic root canal sealer. J Endod. 2012 Jun;38(6):842-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.02.029. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

  • Guven EP, Tasli PN, Yalvac ME, Sofiev N, Kayahan MB, Sahin F. In vitro comparison of induction capacity and biomineralization ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and a bioceramic root canal sealer. Int Endod J. 2013 Dec;46(12):1173-82. doi: 10.1111/iej.12115. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

  • Veljovic D, Colic M, Kojic V, Bogdanovic G, Kojic Z, Banjac A, Palcevskis E, Petrovic R, Janackovic D. The effect of grain size on the biocompatibility, cell-materials interface, and mechanical properties of microwave-sintered bioceramics. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012 Nov;100(11):3059-70. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34225. Epub 2012 Jun 26.

  • Jo SB, Kim HK, Lee HN, Kim YJ, Dev Patel K, Campbell Knowles J, Lee JH, Song M. Physical Properties and Biofunctionalities of Bioactive Root Canal Sealers In Vitro. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 Sep 4;10(9):1750. doi: 10.3390/nano10091750.

  • Camargo RV, Silva-Sousa YTC, Rosa RPFD, Mazzi-Chaves JF, Lopes FC, Steier L, Sousa-Neto MD. Evaluation of the physicochemical properties of silicone- and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers. Braz Oral Res. 2017 Aug 21;31:e72. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0072.

  • Sathorn C, Parashos P, Messer HH. Effectiveness of single- versus multiple-visit endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2005 Jun;38(6):347-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00955.x.

  • Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature -- Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J. 2008 Jan;41(1):6-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01323.x. Epub 2007 Oct 10.

  • Karamifar K, Tondari A, Saghiri MA. Endodontic Periapical Lesion: An Overview on the Etiology, Diagnosis and Current Treatment Modalities. Eur Endod J. 2020 Jul 14;5(2):54-67. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.42714. eCollection 2020.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Periapical PeriodontitisPain, Postoperative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Periapical DiseasesJaw DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesPeriodontitisPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Tan Firat eyuboglu, Prof

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Yelda Erdem Hepsenoglu, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director, Clinical Research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2026

First Posted

October 9, 2026

Study Start

April 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 10, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 10, 2027

Last Updated

October 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

After its publication in a journal, the investigators want to share their data.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
After its publication in a journal, the investigators want to share their data.
Access Criteria
Postoperative pain scores, radiographic and clinical findings.

Locations