NCT07866950

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if tDCS works to treat fatigue state in athletes. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does tDCS on the physical performance in high-level volleyball players during dual fatigue. What montages have the best effects on fatigue state. Researchers will compare tDCS to a placebo (sham stimulation) to see if tDCS have the effects on fatigue state in athletes. Participants will: Received four 10 min sessions tDCS in counterbalanced order.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 2, 2024

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 11, 2025

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 4, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 5, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 9, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

October 9, 2026

Status Verified

October 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

October 5, 2026

Last Update Submit

October 5, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

volleyball playerphysical performancefatiguetranscranial direct current stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Spike test

    The spike test was used as previously described (Valades, 2009) to measure spiking performance. Subjects self-tossed the ball (Molten V5M5000), and then spike toward a 1.5 × 1.5-m target zone with maximal strength without jumping off the ground. Ball velocity was measured by radar gun (Bushnell Outdoor Products, Kansas, USA) situated in the target zone. Each player completed three trials, and the fastest ball speed was used in the analyses.

    At Baseline, immediately following stimulation, and 40-min following stimulation

  • Medicine ball test

    The medicine ball test was used to measure upper limb strength (D et al., 2018). Subjects stood behind a line with their feet side by side but slightly separated, the 2-kg ball was initially drawn back behind the head, then propelled forward to achieve maximum distance. Each player completed two trials, and the best one was used in the analyses.

    At Baseline, immediately following stimulation, and 40-min following stimulation

  • Counter movement jump

    The countermovement jump was used to measure lower limb strength and jumping performance (Del Coso et al., 2014). Following an auditory cue, the participant flexed his knees and jumped as high as possible, keeping his hands on his waist, and landed with both feet on the optical jump system (Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). Each subject carried out three trials, and the highest jump was used in the analyses.

    At Baseline, immediately following stimulation, and 40-min following stimulation

  • T-test

    A modified T-test was used to measure agility and change of direction ability. As previously described (Sassi et al., 2009), subjects started with both feet positioned behind a starting line (cone A), then sprinted forward 5 m and touched the cone B. Then, they shuffled sideways to the left (2.5 m) and touched cone C. They then did the same side shuffling to the right (5 m) and touched cone D. They then shuffled back to the cone B, and backpedal to the cone A. All subjects completed two attempts, and the fastest time was measured by timing gates (Wireless timing systems, Shiniangong, China) used in the analyses.

    At Baseline, immediately following stimulation, and 40-min following stimulation

  • 30-m sprint test

    Linear sprinting performance was measured by a 30-m sprint (Meckel et al., 2015), and the speed measure was obtained by a timing gate. All subjects started approximately 0.4 m behind the starting gate. All subjects completed two attempts and the highest speed was used in the analyses.

    At Baseline, immediately following stimulation, and 40-min following stimulation

  • 15-s rebound jump test

    The 15-s rebound jump was used to measure continuous jumping performance (Del Coso et al., 2014). The subjects put their hands on their hips and performed continuous vertical jumps on the Optojump system. The average jump height was used in the analyses.

    At Baseline, immediately following stimulation, and 40-min following stimulation

Study Arms (4)

tDCS over M1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For the M1-channel, the anode electrode was placed on Cz, C1 and C2 (5 x 7 cm), and the reference (5 x 5 cm) was placed on the right shoulder.

Device: tDCS

tDCS over DLPFC

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For the DLPFC-channel, the anode electrode was placed on the F3 (5 x 5 cm), and the reference (5 x 5 cm) was placed on the left shoulder.

Device: tDCS

tDCS over M1 and DLPFC

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

dual a-tDCS was performed in both channels

Device: tDCS

sham stimulation

SHAM COMPARATOR

In sham stimulation, the stimulator was turned off after 30 s of stimulation. Ramp up and down period lasted 15 s in all conditions.

Device: tDCS

Interventions

tDCSDEVICE

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulation tool that modulates cortical excitability and spontaneous brain activity via low-intensity currents.

sham stimulationtDCS over DLPFCtDCS over M1tDCS over M1 and DLPFC

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • volleyball players in High-level

You may not qualify if:

  • Injuries or illnesses within the last three months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Beijing Sport University

Beijing, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fatigue

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological Techniques

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2026

First Posted

October 9, 2026

Study Start

August 2, 2024

Primary Completion

June 11, 2025

Study Completion

April 4, 2026

Last Updated

October 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-10

Locations