NCT07857707

Brief Summary

Purpose Hip fractures in older adults often cause a serious loss of strength and independence. Physical therapy helps people recover, but patients do not always exercise consistently or correctly. This study tests whether adding an automated motivational support tool to physical therapy helps patients recover better than physical therapy alone. How the tool works The tool uses a regular camera to record movement during exercise. It does not use facial recognition. It gives the patient simple, encouraging messages, such as "great job" or "keep going." It does not give medical advice or correct the patient's movements during the session. The research team reviews the recordings later; they are not reviewed in real time. Who can join People age 70 or older who had surgery for a hip fracture and are staying in the Orthogeriatrics Unit at Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, in Madrid, Spain. What happens in the study Forty-eight people will take part. Half will receive standard physical therapy plus one daily session with the motivational tool. Half will receive standard physical therapy alone. Researchers will measure physical performance with a short walking and balance test. They will measure it three times: at the start, when the patient leaves the hospital, and one month later. Why it matters This study will show whether an automated motivational tool helps patients recover more strength and function after a hip fracture.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
15mo left

Started Oct 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress2%
Oct 2026Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 23, 2026

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2026

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 5, 2026

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

October 5, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

September 23, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 29, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

PhysiotherapyHip fractureFrail elderlyRehabilitationTherapeutic adherenceArtificial intelligenceMotion captureMotivational feedbackDigital health

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Physical performance - Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

    The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) is a standardized, validated measure of lower-extremity physical function in older adults. It combines three timed tests: standing balance (feet together, semi-tandem, and tandem positions), gait speed over a 4-meter walk, and lower-limb strength (five repeated chair stands, performed without using the arms). Each component is scored from 0 to 4, for a total score ranging from 0 (worst) to 12 (best). Lower scores indicate greater functional impairment and a higher risk of disability and falls.

    Baseline (T0, day weight-bearing is authorized after surgery), at hospital discharge (T1, up to 30 days after baseline), and 1 month after discharge (T2)

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Pain - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Baseline (T0, day weight-bearing is authorized after surgery), at hospital discharge (T1, up to 30 days after baseline), and 1 month after discharge (T2)

  • Muscle strength - Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale

    Baseline (T0, day weight-bearing is authorized after surgery), at hospital discharge (T1, up to 30 days after baseline), and 1 month after discharge (T2)

  • Joint range of motion - Goniometry

    Baseline (T0, day weight-bearing is authorized after surgery), at hospital discharge (T1, up to 30 days after baseline), and 1 month after discharge (T2)

  • Basic activities of daily living - Barthel Index

    Baseline (T0, day weight-bearing is authorized after surgery), at hospital discharge (T1, up to 30 days after baseline), and 1 month after discharge (T2)

  • Ambulation capacity - Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC)

    Baseline (T0, day weight-bearing is authorized after surgery), at hospital discharge (T1, up to 30 days after baseline), and 1 month after discharge (T2)

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Group - AI-Assisted Motivational Physiotherapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive standard hospital physiotherapy plus one daily session with the automated motivational support and movement-capture system (RGB camera, generic motivational feedback), Monday through Friday during the hospital stay.

Other: Conventional hospital physiotherapyDevice: Automated motivational support and movement-capture system

Control Group - Conventional Physiotherapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants receive standard hospital physiotherapy plus an equivalent autonomous exercise session per the unit's current protocol, Monday through Friday during the hospital stay, without the motivational support/movement-capture system.

Other: Conventional hospital physiotherapy

Interventions

Standard structured physiotherapy program delivered once daily, Monday through Friday, during the hospital stay, following a two-phase protocol (seated exercises; sit-to-stand and gait training).

Control Group - Conventional PhysiotherapyExperimental Group - AI-Assisted Motivational Physiotherapy

RGB camera-based system using a body-pose estimation model (MediaPipe) to record movement during exercise sessions for deferred, off-line biomechanical analysis. Provides only pre-scheduled, generic auditory and visual motivational feedback, independent of how the patient performs the exercise; performs no facial recognition, no automated biometric identification, and no real-time technical correction.

Experimental Group - AI-Assisted Motivational Physiotherapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age70 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 70 years
  • Diagnosis of hip fracture due to bone fragility
  • Hospital admission to the Orthogeriatrics Unit, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital (Ward 3DA, rooms 301-314)
  • Signed informed consent
  • Frailty, assessed with the FRAIL-Spain scale (score 3 to 5)
  • Weight-bearing authorized by the medical team (Trauma Surgery Department)

You may not qualify if:

  • Hip fracture due to high-energy trauma
  • Pathological fracture (bone metastasis or tumor)
  • Pre-fracture ambulation capacity (FAC) of 0 to 2
  • Other coexisting fractures
  • Inability to complete clinical follow-up
  • Lack of cooperation with the physiotherapy program
  • Neurodegenerative disease at a moderate stage or beyond (cognitive impairment GDS ≥ 6, or Parkinson's disease Hoehn-Yahr stage 3-5)
  • Institutionalized patients (due to earlier hospital discharge)
  • Post-surgical complications (e.g., infection, poor surgical wound healing, suspected deep vein thrombosis)
  • History of underlying conditions affecting balance or posture (cancer, dizziness, vertigo, or stroke)
  • Physical disability that could compromise sample homogeneity
  • Sensory impairment preventing use of digital tools
  • Severe cognitive impairment (Lobo's Mini-Mental State Examination score ≤ 9, equivalent to GDS ≥ 6)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal

Madrid, Madrid, 28034, Spain

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Sevilla-Gonzalez MDR, Moreno Loaeza L, Lazaro-Carrera LS, Bourguet Ramirez B, Vazquez Rodriguez A, Peralta-Pedrero ML, Almeda-Valdes P. Spanish Version of the System Usability Scale for the Assessment of Electronic Tools: Development and Validation. JMIR Hum Factors. 2020 Dec 16;7(4):e21161. doi: 10.2196/21161.

    PMID: 33325828BACKGROUND
  • Oh YJ, Zhang J, Fang ML, Fukuoka Y. A systematic review of artificial intelligence chatbots for promoting physical activity, healthy diet, and weight loss. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Dec 11;18(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01224-6.

    PMID: 34895247BACKGROUND
  • Kwon S, Perera S, Pahor M, Katula JA, King AC, Groessl EJ, Studenski SA. What is a meaningful change in physical performance? Findings from a clinical trial in older adults (the LIFE-P study). J Nutr Health Aging. 2009 Jun;13(6):538-44. doi: 10.1007/s12603-009-0104-z.

    PMID: 19536422BACKGROUND
  • Nuevo M, Rodriguez-Rodriguez D, Jauregui R, Fabrellas N, Zabalegui A, Conti M, Prat-Fabregat S. Telerehabilitation following fast-track total knee arthroplasty is effective and safe: a randomized controlled trial with the ReHub(R) platform. Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Jun;46(12):2629-2639. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2228689. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

    PMID: 37403684BACKGROUND
  • Hopewell S, Chan AW, Collins GS, Hrobjartsson A, Moher D, Schulz KF, Tunn R, Aggarwal R, Berkwits M, Berlin JA, Bhandari N, Butcher NJ, Campbell MK, Chidebe RCW, Elbourne D, Farmer A, Fergusson DA, Golub RM, Goodman SN, Hoffmann TC, Ioannidis JPA, Kahan BC, Knowles RL, Lamb SE, Lewis S, Loder E, Offringa M, Ravaud P, Richards DP, Rockhold FW, Schriger DL, Siegfried NL, Staniszewska S, Taylor RS, Thabane L, Torgerson D, Vohra S, White IR, Boutron I. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. BMJ. 2025 Apr 14;389:e081123. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081123.

    PMID: 40228833BACKGROUND
  • Chan AW, Boutron I, Hopewell S, Moher D, Schulz KF, Collins GS, Tunn R, Aggarwal R, Berkwits M, Berlin JA, Bhandari N, Butcher NJ, Campbell MK, Chidebe RCW, Elbourne DR, Farmer AJ, Fergusson DA, Golub RM, Goodman SN, Hoffmann TC, Ioannidis JPA, Kahan BC, Knowles RL, Lamb SE, Lewis S, Loder E, Offringa M, Ravaud P, Richards DP, Rockhold FW, Schriger DL, Siegfried NL, Staniszewska S, Taylor RS, Thabane L, Torgerson DJ, Vohra S, White IR, Hrobjartsson A. SPIRIT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials. PLoS Med. 2025 Apr 28;22(4):e1004589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004589. eCollection 2025 Apr.

    PMID: 40294521BACKGROUND
  • Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, Studenski SA. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 May;54(5):743-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00701.x.

    PMID: 16696738BACKGROUND
  • Kim S, Kim S, Kim H, Kim H, Yoo JI. Cross-sectional study comparing smart insoles and manual methods for short physical performance battery in hip fracture patients. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2025 Mar 1;37(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s40520-025-02960-6.

    PMID: 40021544BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hip FracturesFrailtyTreatment Adherence and Compliance

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Femoral FracturesFractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesHip InjuriesLeg InjuriesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsHealth BehaviorBehavior

Central Study Contacts

Verónica O Ocaña, Fisioterapia

CONTACT

Manuel Vicente M Mejía, Médico Geriatra

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The outcome assessor and the statistician responsible for the analysis are unaware of each participant's group assignment (double-blind). The participant and the physiotherapist administering the session cannot be masked, since the intervention - the session with the automated motivational support and movement-capture system using an RGB camera - is directly observable and non-pharmacological, making it infeasible to conceal from either the recipient or the person delivering it.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants are randomized 1:1 to one of two parallel arms that run concurrently, with no crossover. Both arms receive standard hospital physiotherapy once daily, Monday through Friday, during the hospital stay. In addition, the experimental arm completes one daily session with an automated motivational support and movement-capture system, while the control arm completes an equivalent autonomous exercise session under the unit's current standard protocol, without the system. All participants are assessed at the same three time points - baseline, hospital discharge, and 1-month follow-up.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2026

First Posted

October 5, 2026

Study Start

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

October 5, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared outside the study team, because the dataset includes special-category personal data - video and audio recordings and health-related information - protected under the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Spanish Law 3/2018 (LOPDGDD). Participants provided informed consent for defined research purposes only (primary analysis and, where separately authorized, AI model development), not for public data sharing or secondary use by third parties. Given the small sample size (n=48) and the identifiable nature of video-based movement data, de-identification to a degree sufficient for public sharing cannot be guaranteed. Data are pseudonymized, access is restricted to authorized investigators under a Data Processing Agreement (GDPR Article 28) between Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal and Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, and are retained for a maximum of 5 years after study completion.

Locations