SniffTrain: Effectiveness of Sniff Training in the Treatment of Post-Viral Anosmia
1 other identifier
interventional
204
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to learn whether a structured smell training program (called "sniff training") can help improve sense of smell and quality of life in people who have experienced a reduced or lost sense of smell following a viral illness (also called post-viral anosmia).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2027
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 5, 2026
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 5, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2031
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2031
October 5, 2026
September 1, 2026
4.6 years
September 25, 2026
September 30, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Improvement in Odor Perception
The investigators will use a highly-validated psychophysical smell test (the Sniffin' Sticks Extended Test) to assess changes in olfactory perception and their duration. This test is the primary outcome measure. The resulting TDI score reflects performance on three related test components that measure odor detection Threshold, odor Discrimination, and odor Identification. The scale is 0-48, with higher scores indicating greater function. Investigators will also administer another highly-validated psychophysical smell test, the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). The score on this 40 point test will not be used to determine the primary outcome but will allow direct comparisons to some other studies that used this measure (higher scores indicated greater function).
From enrollment to the end-of-study visit at 52 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Improvement in social and emotional loneliness
From enrollment to the end-of-study visit at 52 weeks
Improvement in quality of life
From enrollment to the end-of-study visit at 52 weeks
Changes in olfactory-associated quality of life
From enrollment to the end-of-study visit at 52 weeks
Changes in cognitive function
From enrollment to the end-of-study visit at 52 weeks.
Study Arms (3)
Arm 1: Sniffing named odors
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomly assigned to Arm 1 will receive sniff training kits containing four inhaler cartridges, with each cartridge containing a different odor (such as lemon, leather, rose, banana, etc). Odor names will be on the cartridges. Participants are instructed to sniff each inhaler cartridge in the morning and evening for 12 weeks. After this initial 12 weeks, participants will receive a new kit which may contain four different odors. These new inhaler cartridges will be sniffed for an additional 12 weeks. At several points in the study, participants will take smell tests or answer questionnaires to assess their ability to smell, their quality of life, and their psychological and neurological health.
Arm 2: Sniffing unnamed odors
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm 2 will be identical to Arm 1 with the exception that the inhaler cartridges provided to participants randomly assigned to Arm 2 will not have labels identifying the aroma contained in each cartridge.
Arm 3: Control Arm
OTHERArm 3 will be identical to Arm 2 with the exception that the inhaler cartridges will not contain the same amount of odor as in the inhaler cartridges used in Arm 2.
Interventions
This study will test the ability of a structured smell training protocol (called "sniff training") to improved smell function. Participants will be asked to sniff inhaler cartridges containing different USDA GRAS (generally recognized as safe) odors (such as lemon, leather, strawberry, banana, etc). The amount of odor may differ, and odors may or may not be identified on the inhalers. The inhaler cartridge are provided at no charge to study participants in kits that contain four inhalers each.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 10 - 60 years old
- For adults, competent and willing to give informed consent
- For minors, competent and willing to give assent, with informed consent from the parent-guardian
- Willing to undergo study procedures
- Able to follow written and verbal instructions in English
- Be able to report test/questionnaire answers via a computer, tablet, or smartphone interface
- Have a diagnosis of anosmia or hyposmia resulting from a viral infection of the upper respiratory system, with the time since the initial loss of olfactory function \> 3 months and \< 2 years prior
You may not qualify if:
- Aged less than 10 years old, and greater than 60 years old
- Prisoners
- Cognitively impaired individuals
- Individuals who are deemed to not have the capacity to consent by the study team through observation and direct interaction
- Individuals 50-60 years old who score \<31 on the TICS survey (to rule out potential dementia)
- Non-English speaking subjects
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Diseases of the central nervous system (including Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, brain tumors), nasal obstruction (tumors/polyps)
- History of nasal or sinus surgery
- History of a severe head injury/concussion
- History of chronic sinus infections, allergic rhinitis, and active sinonasal disease
- History of radiation therapy to the head or neck (ever)
- Recent chemotherapy (within the last year)
- History of lung/pulmonary disease
- Diagnosis of an olfactory disorder with an etiology other than a viral infection of the upper respiratory system
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Virginialead
- Johns Hopkins Universitycollaborator
- Medical University of South Carolinacollaborator
- National Institutes of Health (NIH)collaborator
Study Sites (3)
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21218, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven Munger
University of Virginia
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2026
First Posted
October 5, 2026
Study Start (Estimated)
January 5, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2031
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2031
Last Updated
October 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share