Aquatic Skill-Efficiency Instruction Versus Classical Learn-to-Swim Instruction in 8-10-Year-Old Novice Swimmers
A Randomized Comparison of Aquatic Skill-Efficiency Instruction and Classical Learn-to-Swim Instruction on 25-m Swimming Performance and Stroke Skill in 8-10-Year-Old Novice Swimmers
1 other identifier
interventional
107
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized study compared two 12-week learn-to-swim instructional approaches in novice children aged 8-10 years. Children were individually allocated in a 1:1 ratio to Aquatic Skill-Efficiency Instruction or a classical learn-to-swim program. Both groups received the same planned instructional exposure of 36 supervised sessions over 12 weeks, delivered three times per week for 90 minutes per session. The programs differed primarily in pedagogical organization rather than lesson frequency or duration. The primary outcome was 25-m front-crawl time. Secondary outcomes included 25-m backstroke time, blinded video-rated front-crawl and backstroke skill, and stroke count. Harms and safety events were monitored throughout the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 19, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 26, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2026
CompletedOctober 1, 2026
September 1, 2026
3 months
September 26, 2026
September 26, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
25-m Front-Crawl Time
Time required to complete 25 m front crawl from an in-water push start to first contact with the finish wall. At baseline, participants completed two trials and the arithmetic mean was used. At post-intervention, one 25-m trial was completed under the same standardized conditions. Lower values indicate faster swimming performance.
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
25-m Backstroke Time
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Front-Crawl Stroke Skill Score
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Backstroke Stroke Skill Score
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Front-Crawl Stroke Count
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Backstroke Stroke Count
Baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 12)
Study Arms (2)
Aquatic Skill-Efficiency Instruction
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to this arm received Aquatic Skill-Efficiency Instruction, a structured learn-to-swim program organized around four learning components: Establish control, Elongate alignment, Economize propulsion, and Evaluate efficiency. The program used systematic instructional sequencing, mastery-based progression, efficiency-oriented feedback, and structured child self-monitoring. Instruction was delivered in 36 supervised sessions over 12 weeks, three times per week, with a nominal duration of 90 minutes per session.
Classical Learn-to-Swim Instruction
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants assigned to this arm received conventional learn-to-swim instruction emphasizing water familiarization, breath control, floating, gliding, kicking, basic arm actions, repeated 12.5-25 m front-crawl and backstroke practice, demonstration, repetition, correction of visible errors, and progressive completion of short swimming distances. Instruction was delivered in 36 supervised sessions over 12 weeks, three times per week, with a nominal duration of 90 minutes per session.
Interventions
Aquatic Skill-Efficiency Instruction was a structured 12-week learn-to-swim program delivered in 36 supervised sessions, three times per week, with a nominal duration of 90 minutes per session. The program was organized around four learning components: Establish control, Elongate alignment, Economize propulsion, and Evaluate efficiency. Instruction emphasized aquatic control, streamlined body alignment, economical propulsion, breathing rhythm, stroke-count awareness, mastery-based progression, efficiency-oriented feedback, and structured child self-monitoring.
Conventional learn-to-swim instruction was delivered over 12 weeks in 36 supervised sessions, three times per week, with a nominal duration of 90 minutes per session. Lessons emphasized water familiarization, breath control, floating, gliding, kicking, basic arm actions, repeated 12.5-25 m front-crawl and backstroke practice, demonstration, repetition, correction of visible errors, and progressive completion of short swimming distances.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 8.0-10.9 years.
- Classification as a novice swimmer, defined as a non-competitive child with limited prior formal swimming instruction.
- Ability to safely participate in shallow-water instructional activities, including basic water comfort and absence of diagnosed aquaphobia.
You may not qualify if:
- Any musculoskeletal, neurological, cardiovascular, or respiratory condition that might limit safe participation in swimming lessons.
- Ongoing pharmacological treatment affecting balance, motor control, or exercise tolerance.
- Current participation in structured competitive swimming training more than three sessions per week.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Specialized Children's and Youth Sports School for Water Sports
Tashkent, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and swimming instructors were not blinded because of the nature of the instructional intervention. Video-based front-crawl and backstroke skill ratings were performed independently by two assessors who were blinded to group allocation, participant identity, and testing occasion. Live poolside timekeepers and stroke counters were not blinded to group allocation.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 26, 2026
First Posted
October 1, 2026
Study Start
May 19, 2025
Primary Completion
August 22, 2025
Study Completion
August 22, 2025
Last Updated
October 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Beginning upon publication of the study results and available thereafter without a planned end date.
- Access Criteria
- The de-identified participant-level dataset, de-identified assessor-level stroke-skill ratings, and accompanying data dictionary will be available as supplementary materials associated with the published article. Access will not require a separate application or approval. Potentially identifiable video recordings and participant-linked source documents will not be made publicly available.
De-identified individual participant-level numerical data underlying the reported analyses will be shared, including the participant-level dataset used for the primary and secondary outcome analyses and de-identified assessor-level stroke-skill ratings used for inter-rater reliability analyses. A data dictionary describing the participant-level variables will also be provided. Potentially identifiable video recordings and participant-linked source documents will not be shared publicly because parental consent did not permit public dissemination of potentially identifiable material.