NCT07851870

Brief Summary

Laparoscopic abdominal surgery carries one of the highest risks of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and postoperative opioids given for pain are themselves emetogenic. Intrathecal morphine provides prolonged analgesia but increases nausea; intrathecal atropine 100 µg has been reported to reduce morphine-related nausea under spinal anaesthesia alone, but has not been tested within a combined spinal-general technique. This randomised, open-label, parallel-group trial compared combined spinal-general anaesthesia (CSGA), hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg, morphine 100 µg and atropine 100 µg given intrathecally before induction, followed by general anaesthesia, with general anaesthesia (GA) alone in adults undergoing elective abdominal laparoscopy. Both groups received identical general anaesthesia, multimodal analgesia (paracetamol and ketorolac at skin closure), end-of-case ondansetron and neostigmine-atropine reversal. The primary outcome was the occurrence of PONV within 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain, rescue antiemetic and rescue opioid requirements, intraoperative fentanyl consumption and perioperative haemodynamics.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
63

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2026

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 2, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 26, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 26, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 18, 2026

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

September 18, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 25, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

AtropineIntrathecalMorphineSpinal anaesthesiaPONVLaparoscopyOpioid sparing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

    Proportion of participants with a score of 1 or more on a 5-point PONV analogue visual scale (0 = none; 1 = nausea \<10 min or one vomit, no treatment; 2 = nausea \>10 min or two vomits, no treatment; 3 = nausea \>10 min or more than two vomits requiring treatment; 4 = refractory to treatment), assessed at 1 h in recovery and at 2, 6, 12 and 24 h on the ward. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Within 24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Postoperative pain intensity

    2, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery

  • Number of participants requiring rescue morphine

    Within 24 hours

  • Number of participants requiring rescue ondansetron

    Within 24 hours

  • Total post-induction fentanyl dose

    Intraoperative period, from induction to end of anaesthesia

  • Mean arterial pressure

    Pre-induction, after spinal injection, at and after insufflation, after desufflation, after extubation (intraoperative period)

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Combined spinal-general anaesthesia (CSGA)

EXPERIMENTAL

Before induction, spinal anaesthesia at L4-5 in the sitting position with a 27-G Quincke needle: 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg, preservative-free morphine 100 µg and atropine sulphate 100 µg, made up to 4 mL with 0.9% saline, targeting a T6 sensory level. General anaesthesia was then induced and maintained as in the comparator arm.

Drug: Intrathecal bupivacaine, morphine and atropineProcedure: General anaesthesiaDrug: Multimodal analgesia and antiemetic prophylaxis

GA alone

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

General anaesthesia without any neuraxial block: induction with lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg, fentanyl 2 µg/kg, propofol 2 mg/kg and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg; maintenance with sevoflurane in oxygen-air at target MAC 0.8, with fentanyl 25-50 µg boluses for haemodynamic response.

Procedure: General anaesthesiaDrug: Multimodal analgesia and antiemetic prophylaxis

Interventions

Hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg + preservative-free morphine 100 µg + atropine sulphate 100 µg in 4 mL, single intrathecal injection before induction

Combined spinal-general anaesthesia (CSGA)

Lidocaine, fentanyl, propofol, rocuronium induction; sevoflurane maintenance; neostigmine-atropine reversal

Combined spinal-general anaesthesia (CSGA)GA alone

Paracetamol 1 g and ketorolac 30 mg IV at skin closure; ondansetron 4 mg IV at end of anaesthesia

Combined spinal-general anaesthesia (CSGA)GA alone

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 64 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18 to 64 years
  • ASA physical status I or II
  • Body mass index 30 kg/m² or less
  • Scheduled for elective digestive, gynaecological or urological laparoscopy
  • Written informed consent given

You may not qualify if:

  • Uncontrolled stage 2 hypertension
  • Heart failure, arrhythmia, valvular heart disease or atrioventricular block
  • Cerebrovascular event within the previous 3 months
  • Raised intracranial pressure
  • Severe renal or hepatic disease
  • Coagulopathy
  • Infection at the site of lumbar puncture

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cipto Mangunkusumo National Central General Hospital (RSCM)

Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Nausea and VomitingPain, Postoperative

Interventions

MorphineAtropineAnesthesia, General

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNauseaSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsVomitingPainNeurologic Manifestations

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Morphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic CompoundsAtropine DerivativesTropanesAzabicyclo CompoundsAza CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsBelladonna AlkaloidsSolanaceous AlkaloidsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicAnesthesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Study Officials

  • Pryambodho Pryambodho, MD

    Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, FKUI-RSCM

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two-group parallel-assignment design. Eligible adults undergoing elective abdominal laparoscopy were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to combined spinal-general anaesthesia or general anaesthesia alone, using a random sequence generated by a research assistant with www.randomizer.org. No allocation concealment or masking was used; the allocation sequence was known to the investigators throughout. Consent was obtained by a researcher not involved in the participant's clinical care. Each participant received one allocated technique only, with no crossover.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2026

First Posted

October 1, 2026

Study Start

February 2, 2026

Primary Completion

March 26, 2026

Study Completion

March 26, 2026

Last Updated

October 1, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared. The informed consent obtained from participants and the ethics approval for this study provided for research data to be kept confidential, with access limited to regulatory authorities for verification purposes, and did not include provision for sharing individual-level data with third parties.

Locations