NCT07845227

Brief Summary

When crowded or protruded teeth are treated by removing an upper premolar on each side, the canine (eye tooth) is first moved backward into the space. As it moves, the tooth tends to rotate and tip out of position, and this rotation is one of the hardest movements to correct and most likely to come back later. This study tested a simple addition to the usual treatment: a small passive wire attached to the inner (palate) side of the canine and connected to the back tooth, meant to guide the canine and keep it from rotating, without adding any extra force. Sixteen adolescents who needed an upper premolar removed on both sides took part. Because each person has two sides, every patient received both approaches at once: on one randomly chosen side the guide wire was added, and the other side was treated the same way but without it, serving as that patient's own comparison. This split-mouth design lets each patient act as their own control. The canine was moved backward on both sides using the same light spring and a small bone screw for anchorage. The researchers took dental scans at the start and after one, two, and three months and measured how far each canine moved, how much it rotated and tipped, and whether the back tooth drifted forward. The goal was to find out whether the guide wire reduces unwanted rotation and tipping and affects how quickly the canine moves, without weakening the anchorage.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
16

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 4, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 16, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 16, 2024

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 22, 2026

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 28, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

September 28, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

September 22, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 22, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Canine distalizationPalatal guide wireMiniscrewDistopalatal rotationAnchorageSplit-mouth

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Cumulative distopalatal rotation of the maxillary canine

    Change from baseline in the angle between the sagittal reference line and a line through the canine cusp tip along the palatal ridge, measured on rugae-superimposed digital models and compared between the guide wire and control sides.

    Baseline (T0) and 3 months (T3)

  • Cumulative canine distalization

    Change from baseline in the perpendicular distance from the canine cusp tip to the sagittal reference line, compared between the guide wire and control sides.

    Baseline (T0) and 3 months (T3)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Canine tipping

    Baseline (T0) and 3 months (T3)

  • First molar anchorage loss

    Baseline (T0) and 3 months (T3)

  • Monthly rate of canine distalization and rotation

    T0, 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), and 3 months (T3)

Study Arms (2)

Guide wire side

EXPERIMENTAL

The maxillary canine on the randomly allocated side was distalized with a 150-g nickel-titanium closed coil spring from an interradicular miniscrew to a power arm in the vertical slot of the canine bracket, with a passive palatal guide wire engaged between a bracket on the palatal surface of the canine and the first molar band sheath.

Device: Palatal guide wireProcedure: Miniscrew-supported canine distalization

Control side

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The contralateral canine was distalized with the identical coil-spring and power-arm system, without a palatal guide wire.

Procedure: Miniscrew-supported canine distalization

Interventions

A passive 0.020-inch round stainless steel wire engaged between a bracket bonded to the palatal surface of the maxillary canine and the first molar band sheath. The wire was never activated and added no force to the distalization system.

Guide wire side

Distalization of the maxillary canine with a 150-g nickel-titanium closed coil spring extended from an interradicular miniscrew to a U-shaped power arm seated in the vertical slot of the canine bracket.

Control sideGuide wire side

Eligibility Criteria

Age14 Years - 20 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Angle Class II division 1 or division 2 malocclusion
  • Indication for maxillary first premolar extraction
  • Maximum anchorage requirement
  • Minimal or no maxillary incisor crowding
  • No previous orthodontic treatment
  • No congenitally missing or previously extracted maxillary teeth other than third molars
  • Completed pubertal growth spurt

You may not qualify if:

  • Any systemic disease or regular medication use
  • Poor oral hygiene or active periodontal disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics

Samsun, Marmara, 55139, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion, Angle Class II

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MalocclusionTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
The operator was blinded to allocation until the T0 appointment, so the side to receive the guide wire was unknown during the preparatory phase. Blinding could not be maintained thereafter because the palatal attachment is visible both intraorally and on the scanned casts; no party could be masked once the appliance was placed.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Split-mouth (within-patient) design. Each participant received both interventions simultaneously, one on each side of the maxilla: the guide wire on the randomly allocated side and no guide wire on the contralateral (control) side. Each patient therefore served as their own control, and the two sides - not two groups of patients - form the two arms.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2026

First Posted

September 28, 2026

Study Start

March 4, 2024

Primary Completion

August 16, 2024

Study Completion

August 16, 2024

Last Updated

September 28, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data will not be shared in a public repository. De-identified data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Locations