NCT07844824

Brief Summary

This study examined whether an additional injection of the long-acting local anesthetic ropivacaine at the surgical site could reduce pain and improve recovery after removal of lower wisdom teeth. Adults aged 18 to 65 years who needed both lower wisdom teeth removed could take part. Each participant underwent two separate wisdom tooth removal procedures, approximately two weeks apart. After one procedure, ropivacaine was injected near the surgical area, while after the other procedure, a sterile saline solution was given in the same way for comparison. Neither the participant nor the surgeon knew which treatment was used at each procedure. Participants recorded their pain after surgery and their use of pain-relieving medication. Mouth opening and the effect of the procedure on daily life and oral health-related quality of life were also assessed. The purpose of the study was to determine whether adding ropivacaine at the surgical site could provide better pain relief and postoperative recovery than standard treatment alone.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2023

Shorter than P25 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 2, 2023

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 26, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 26, 2024

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 17, 2026

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 28, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

September 28, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

September 17, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 23, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

RopivacaineDental anaesthesiaThird molar removalThird molar extractionSupplementary anesthesia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative Pain Intensity as Assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) During the First 72 Hours After Surgery

    Participants recorded postoperative pain intensity using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) following each mandibular third molar extraction. Pain intensity was recorded separately after the ropivacaine-treated and placebo-treated procedures.

    2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Postoperative Maximal Interincisal Opening as Assessed Using the TheraBite Range of Motion Scale

    Postoperative days 1, 2, and 3

  • Time to First Postoperative Rescue Analgesic Intake

    From completion of surgery until first rescue analgesic intake, assessed up to 72 hours after surgery.

  • Postoperative Rescue Analgesic Consumption

    Day of surgery and postoperative days 1, 2, and 3

  • Oral Health-Related Quality of Life as Assessed by the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14)

    Postoperative day 7

Study Arms (2)

Ropivacaine-treated site

EXPERIMENTAL

Following surgical extraction and suturing of the mandibular third molar, the assigned surgical site received a supplementary subperiosteal injection of 2 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine at the buccal aspect of the extraction site.

Drug: Ropivacaine 0.75%

Placebo-treated site

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Following surgical extraction and suturing of the mandibular third molar, the assigned surgical site received a supplementary subperiosteal injection of 2 mL of 0.9% sterile saline at the buccal aspect of the extraction site.

Other: Saline (0.9% NaCl)

Interventions

Following surgical extraction and suturing of the mandibular third molar, 2 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine was administered as a supplementary subperiosteal injection at the buccal aspect of the extraction site, slightly apical to the bony socket.

Ropivacaine-treated site

Following surgical extraction and suturing of the mandibular third molar, 2 mL of 0.9% sterile saline was administered as a supplementary subperiosteal injection at the buccal aspect of the extraction site, slightly apical to the bony socket.

Placebo-treated site

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 to 65 years.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I.
  • Presence of both mandibular third molars, with both teeth indicated for surgical extraction.
  • Both mandibular third molars of the same Pell and Gregory classification.
  • Satisfactory dental and oral health, without acute inflammatory processes at the surgical site or elsewhere in the oral cavity, including pericoronitis, pulpitis, or apical periodontitis.
  • No use of analgesic medication within 24 hours before surgery.
  • No use of antibiotics within 1 month before surgery.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent.
  • Willingness and ability to comply with study procedures and follow-up.

You may not qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II, III, or IV.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Known allergy to amide-type local anesthetics, vasoconstrictors, or related compounds.
  • Use of dietary supplements that could affect local anesthesia.
  • History of drug or analgesic abuse.
  • Unsatisfactory dental or oral health, including untreated dental caries, periodontitis, or periapical lesions.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Stomatološka poliklinika Zagreb

Zagreb, 10000, Croatia

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Steverink JG, Oostinga D, van Tol FR, van Rijen MHP, Mackaaij C, Verlinde-Schellekens SAMW, Oosterman BJ, Van Wijck AJM, Roeling TAP, Verlaan JJ. Sensory Innervation of Human Bone: An Immunohistochemical Study to Further Understand Bone Pain. J Pain. 2021 Nov;22(11):1385-1395. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 May 5.

    PMID: 33964414BACKGROUND
  • Feldman HS, Covino BG. Comparative motor-blocking effects of bupivacaine and ropivacaine, a new amino amide local anesthetic, in the rat and dog. Anesth Analg. 1988 Nov;67(11):1047-52.

    PMID: 3189893BACKGROUND
  • Amorim KS, Gercina AC, Ramiro FMS, Medeiros LA, de Araujo JSM, Groppo FC, Souza LMA. Can local anesthesia with ropivacaine provide postoperative analgesia in extraction of impacted mandibular third molars? A randomized clinical trial. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021 May;131(5):512-518. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Sep 30.

    PMID: 33223455BACKGROUND
  • Wang Y, Zhou A. A new improvement: subperiosteal cocktail application to effectively reduce pain and blood loss after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jan 30;15(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-1563-5.

    PMID: 32000816BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Sodium Chloride

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ChloridesHydrochloric AcidChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsSodium Compounds

Study Officials

  • Davor Brajdic, DMD, PhD

    School of Dental Medicine Zagreb, University of Zagreb

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Each participant underwent two mandibular third molar extraction procedures approximately two weeks apart and received both study interventions. One surgical site was randomly assigned to receive supplementary subperiosteal 0.75% ropivacaine, while the contralateral site received 0.9% sterile saline. The side receiving ropivacaine at the first procedure was randomized, and the alternate intervention was administered at the second procedure. As such, each participant served as their own control.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor of Dental Medicine, PhD Candidate

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2026

First Posted

September 28, 2026

Study Start

October 2, 2023

Primary Completion

August 26, 2024

Study Completion

August 26, 2024

Last Updated

September 28, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share
Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
Access Criteria
De-identified individual participant data will be made available to qualified researchers conducting systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or other evidence-synthesis projects relevant to the study topic. Requests should include a brief research proposal describing the review question, planned analyses, and the data required. Requests will be reviewed by the study investigators to assess scientific relevance, methodological appropriateness, and consistency with the original informed consent and applicable data protection requirements. Approved requestors may be required to sign a data-sharing agreement specifying the permitted use of the data, data security requirements, and restrictions on further sharing.

Locations