Multicenter Study of Clinical-Pathological Correlation in cT2N0 Gastric Cancer and Its Prognostic Implications
MULTICENTER STUDY OF CLINICAL-PATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION IN cT2N0 GASTRIC CANCER AND ITS PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS
1 other identifier
observational
1,024
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In gastric cancer, accurate preoperative staging of patients with T2N0 disease remains challenging. Correct assessment of tumor depth and lymph node involvement is particularly important in this subgroup, as treatment strategies may differ depending on the final stage. This study aims to correlate preoperative diagnostic findings with postoperative histopathological results in patients with suspected T2N0 gastric cancer, in order to assess the accuracy of current staging modalities and identify factors that may improve preoperative staging and guide treatment selection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2014
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 8, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 7, 2026
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 25, 2026
CompletedSeptember 25, 2026
September 1, 2026
2.5 years
September 7, 2026
September 21, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Concordance between preoperative clinical staging and final pathological staging,
To evaluate, in a national multicenter cohort of patients with gastric cancer clinically classified as T2N0, the frequency and determinants of discordance between preoperative clinical staging and final pathological staging, with particular emphasis on understaging of the T component and, above all, the N component, as well as its impact on the appropriateness of the initial treatment strategy.
through study completion, an average of 5 year
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Understaging adn overstaging rates
through study completion, an average of 5 year
Accuracy of T and N
through study completion, an average of 5 year
Understaging variables
through study completion, an average of 5 years
Echoendoscopy role
through study completion, an average of 5 years
Impact on survival
through study completion, an average of 5 years
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Patients with T2N0 gastric cancer
Gastric adenocarcinoma, cT2M0, surgery with or without neoadyuvant treatment, pTNM
Eligibility Criteria
Clinical factors: age, sex, ASA status, Charlson score, frailty (Veljanovich Modified Frailty Index), tumor markers (CEA, CA 19.9). Preoperative diagnosis: CT scan, endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic findings, biopsy (Lauren classification, histological grade). Surgical and pathological: type of gastrectomy, lymphadenectomy, pTNM, number of lymph nodes examined, resected, and involved Prognosis: neoadjuvant therapy, ypTNM, recurrence, overall survival, and disease-free survival.
You may qualify if:
- gastric adenocarcinoma, cT2N0 classification (CT scan/echoendoscopy), surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy, pTNM stage recorded.
You may not qualify if:
- metastatic disease, non-curative resections.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008, Spain
Related Publications (13)
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jan;24(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y. Epub 2020 Feb 14. No abstract available.
PMID: 32060757BACKGROUNDLevenson G, Voron T, Paye F, Balladur P, Debove C, Chafai N, De Dios AG, Lefevre JH, Parc Y. Tumor downstaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy determines survival after surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma. Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1711-1717. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.021. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
PMID: 34561115BACKGROUNDSu P, Zhang Y, Yu T, Jiang L, Kang W, Liu Y, Yu J. Does postoperative chemotherapy improve overall survival of patients with ypT1-2N0 cancer? World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec 27;20(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02881-y.
PMID: 36572874BACKGROUNDAbboretti F, Lambert C, Schafer M, Pereira B, Le Roy B, Mege D, Piessen G, Gagniere J, Gronnier C, Mantziari S; ADENOKGAST Study Group; AFC-French Association of Surgery. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Does Not Improve Survival in cT2N0M0 Gastric Adenocarcinoma Patients: A Multicenter Propensity Score Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug;31(8):5273-5282. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15418-2. Epub 2024 May 18.
PMID: 38762640BACKGROUNDBaril JA, Ruedinger BM, Nguyen TK, Bilimoria KY, Ceppa EP, Maatman TK, Roch AM, Schmidt CM, Turk A, Yang AD, House MG, Ellis RJ. Staging accuracy in patients with clinical T2N0 gastric cancer: Implications for treatment sequencing. Surgery. 2025 Mar;179:108796. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.055. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
PMID: 39358121BACKGROUNDJu MR, Karalis JD, Blackwell JM, Mansour JC, Polanco PM, Augustine M, Yopp AC, Zeh HJ 3rd, Wang SC, Porembka MR. Inaccurate Clinical Stage Is Common for Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Is Associated with Undertreatment and Worse Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 May;28(5):2831-2843. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09403-8. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
PMID: 33389294BACKGROUNDHan C, Lin R, Shi H, Liu J, Qian W, Ding Z, Hou X. The role of endoscopic ultrasound on the preoperative T staging of gastric cancer: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(36):e4580. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004580.
PMID: 27603347BACKGROUNDda Costa WL, Tran Cao HS, Gu X, Massarweh NN. Understanding the association between clinical staging accuracy, treatment response, and survival among gastric cancer patients through Bayesian analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov;126(6):986-994. doi: 10.1002/jso.27016. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
PMID: 35819061BACKGROUNDJanczewski LM, Shah D, Wells A, Bentrem DJ, Abad JD, Chawla A. The inaccuracies of gastric adenocarcinoma clinical staging and its predictive factors. J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;127(7):1116-1124. doi: 10.1002/jso.27233. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
PMID: 36905333BACKGROUNDObermannova RL, Leong T; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline interim update on the treatment of locally advanced oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma. ESMO Open. 2025 Feb;10(2):104134. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104134. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
PMID: 39986705BACKGROUNDLordick F, Carneiro F, Cascinu S, Fleitas T, Haustermans K, Piessen G, Vogel A, Smyth EC; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022 Oct;33(10):1005-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Jul 29. No abstract available.
PMID: 35914639BACKGROUNDAmin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR, Winchester DP. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):93-99. doi: 10.3322/caac.21388. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
PMID: 28094848BACKGROUNDWorld Health Organization. Global cancer observatory: Cancer today [Internet]. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2022 [cited 2026 Apr 9].
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Target Duration
- 10 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- SPECIALIST IN GENERAL SURGERY, PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR, MD, PHD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 7, 2026
First Posted
September 25, 2026
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
July 8, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2025
Last Updated
September 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09