NCT07842549

Brief Summary

In gastric cancer, accurate preoperative staging of patients with T2N0 disease remains challenging. Correct assessment of tumor depth and lymph node involvement is particularly important in this subgroup, as treatment strategies may differ depending on the final stage. This study aims to correlate preoperative diagnostic findings with postoperative histopathological results in patients with suspected T2N0 gastric cancer, in order to assess the accuracy of current staging modalities and identify factors that may improve preoperative staging and guide treatment selection.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,024

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2014

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2014

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 8, 2016

Completed
8.9 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2025

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 7, 2026

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 25, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

September 25, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

September 7, 2026

Last Update Submit

September 21, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Gastric cancerT2N0

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Concordance between preoperative clinical staging and final pathological staging,

    To evaluate, in a national multicenter cohort of patients with gastric cancer clinically classified as T2N0, the frequency and determinants of discordance between preoperative clinical staging and final pathological staging, with particular emphasis on understaging of the T component and, above all, the N component, as well as its impact on the appropriateness of the initial treatment strategy.

    through study completion, an average of 5 year

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Understaging adn overstaging rates

    through study completion, an average of 5 year

  • Accuracy of T and N

    through study completion, an average of 5 year

  • Understaging variables

    through study completion, an average of 5 years

  • Echoendoscopy role

    through study completion, an average of 5 years

  • Impact on survival

    through study completion, an average of 5 years

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Patients with T2N0 gastric cancer

Gastric adenocarcinoma, cT2M0, surgery with or without neoadyuvant treatment, pTNM

Eligibility Criteria

Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Clinical factors: age, sex, ASA status, Charlson score, frailty (Veljanovich Modified Frailty Index), tumor markers (CEA, CA 19.9). Preoperative diagnosis: CT scan, endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic findings, biopsy (Lauren classification, histological grade). Surgical and pathological: type of gastrectomy, lymphadenectomy, pTNM, number of lymph nodes examined, resected, and involved Prognosis: neoadjuvant therapy, ypTNM, recurrence, overall survival, and disease-free survival.

You may qualify if:

  • gastric adenocarcinoma, cT2N0 classification (CT scan/echoendoscopy), surgery with or without neoadjuvant therapy, pTNM stage recorded.

You may not qualify if:

  • metastatic disease, non-curative resections.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital de Navarra

Pamplona, Navarre, 31008, Spain

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jan;24(1):1-21. doi: 10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y. Epub 2020 Feb 14. No abstract available.

    PMID: 32060757BACKGROUND
  • Levenson G, Voron T, Paye F, Balladur P, Debove C, Chafai N, De Dios AG, Lefevre JH, Parc Y. Tumor downstaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy determines survival after surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma. Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1711-1717. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.021. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

    PMID: 34561115BACKGROUND
  • Su P, Zhang Y, Yu T, Jiang L, Kang W, Liu Y, Yu J. Does postoperative chemotherapy improve overall survival of patients with ypT1-2N0 cancer? World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec 27;20(1):408. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02881-y.

    PMID: 36572874BACKGROUND
  • Abboretti F, Lambert C, Schafer M, Pereira B, Le Roy B, Mege D, Piessen G, Gagniere J, Gronnier C, Mantziari S; ADENOKGAST Study Group; AFC-French Association of Surgery. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Does Not Improve Survival in cT2N0M0 Gastric Adenocarcinoma Patients: A Multicenter Propensity Score Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Aug;31(8):5273-5282. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-15418-2. Epub 2024 May 18.

    PMID: 38762640BACKGROUND
  • Baril JA, Ruedinger BM, Nguyen TK, Bilimoria KY, Ceppa EP, Maatman TK, Roch AM, Schmidt CM, Turk A, Yang AD, House MG, Ellis RJ. Staging accuracy in patients with clinical T2N0 gastric cancer: Implications for treatment sequencing. Surgery. 2025 Mar;179:108796. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.055. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

    PMID: 39358121BACKGROUND
  • Ju MR, Karalis JD, Blackwell JM, Mansour JC, Polanco PM, Augustine M, Yopp AC, Zeh HJ 3rd, Wang SC, Porembka MR. Inaccurate Clinical Stage Is Common for Gastric Adenocarcinoma and Is Associated with Undertreatment and Worse Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 May;28(5):2831-2843. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09403-8. Epub 2021 Jan 2.

    PMID: 33389294BACKGROUND
  • Han C, Lin R, Shi H, Liu J, Qian W, Ding Z, Hou X. The role of endoscopic ultrasound on the preoperative T staging of gastric cancer: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(36):e4580. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004580.

    PMID: 27603347BACKGROUND
  • da Costa WL, Tran Cao HS, Gu X, Massarweh NN. Understanding the association between clinical staging accuracy, treatment response, and survival among gastric cancer patients through Bayesian analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov;126(6):986-994. doi: 10.1002/jso.27016. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

    PMID: 35819061BACKGROUND
  • Janczewski LM, Shah D, Wells A, Bentrem DJ, Abad JD, Chawla A. The inaccuracies of gastric adenocarcinoma clinical staging and its predictive factors. J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;127(7):1116-1124. doi: 10.1002/jso.27233. Epub 2023 Mar 11.

    PMID: 36905333BACKGROUND
  • Obermannova RL, Leong T; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline interim update on the treatment of locally advanced oesophageal and oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma. ESMO Open. 2025 Feb;10(2):104134. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104134. Epub 2025 Feb 12.

    PMID: 39986705BACKGROUND
  • Lordick F, Carneiro F, Cascinu S, Fleitas T, Haustermans K, Piessen G, Vogel A, Smyth EC; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022 Oct;33(10):1005-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Jul 29. No abstract available.

    PMID: 35914639BACKGROUND
  • Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, Meyer L, Gress DM, Byrd DR, Winchester DP. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Mar;67(2):93-99. doi: 10.3322/caac.21388. Epub 2017 Jan 17.

    PMID: 28094848BACKGROUND
  • World Health Organization. Global cancer observatory: Cancer today [Internet]. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2022 [cited 2026 Apr 9].

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stomach NeoplasmsDisease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesStomach DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Target Duration
10 Years
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
SPECIALIST IN GENERAL SURGERY, PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR, MD, PHD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2026

First Posted

September 25, 2026

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion

July 8, 2016

Study Completion

June 1, 2025

Last Updated

September 25, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-09

Locations